kkfan91

I didn't have any problem understanding it. Some people don't want to, have to have it repeated over and over and still don't get it lol.

If given the charters outright, as property, three major issues. 1. NASCAR would lose any control over the quality of teams who come...

Charlie, I get the confusion, really do. But NASCAR’s charter system was never, repeat NEVER set up to become the property of the teams...

Why, if the teams win the suit, it's called a monopoly, they have the charters, can sell them partly to other investors, be able to take...

For the umteenth time. Teams could sell or sub let charters to whomever they choose, take the car and race it anywhere they want...

I'd keep Gray over Sawalitch, but its all money to JGR

Disputes right when they launch FOX One. 🤭 Not a problem for me though. 🏴‍☠️

Congratulations to @Greg, the recipient of the "Highest Finishing Pick" award following the fifth place finish of his pick, Eric Jones...

RIP

They should have considered these options before choosing not to sign charters, when they KNEW their drivers had contracts with these...

For bold prediction reasons I need that to say Jr Motorsports, but I'm not going to try to figure it out by size of the redaction.

https://www.motorsport.com/nascar-cup/news/nascar-signals-intent-to-transfer-disputed-charter/10753446/?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwMZicxjbGNrAxmJYWV4...