Search results

They inspected the 21 after the race at Darlington. Probably why they did it, because he sure wasn't the factor in the race. Some of them were wondering why and having a whine fest about it in the media.

If you think that is is a no big deal functioning as non charter teams, that is your opinion. Trying to prove the Sherman act claiming unfair practices while losing twice to prove that it is unfair to have their charters removed? I disagree that this isn't part of their case. That was a ruling...

They don't have a problem with the win and you are in jackpot, haven't heard a word out of them for that, but they do have a problem with awarding one measly regular point for the fastest lap? Looks like a distraction to me.

The same judge that let them keep their charters, but who was overruled....and then changed his stance and declined the teams appeal to have the charters reinstated. No smoke or fire there.

Maybe the poster with his first post in this racing forum would have better luck posting this in the stick n ball thread.

Judge Bell made a horrible ruling in the first hearing. He gave the two teams false hope to continue on the path they were taking. Out of anybody involved with this case, I would take Judge Bell's legal advice with a grain of salt. The panel of 7 are watching.

Pretty sure the feeling is mutual.

No reinstatement of charters. 23XI and Front Row continue as unchartered teams.

I already do. There are a ton of them out there and quite a few in here. Ignorant of the fact that literally hundreds of tracks have gone broke and disappeared while the family Nascar has been in business and have continued to be successful. No good dead goes unpunished when Nascar tried to...

O/T but yeah, that's in the running for save of the year.