Search results

Why would they publicly state that? This^ And yeah, I think whether FRM ends up winning or not in this they lose. They may get a bit more money for their low finishing position but I'm pretty sure these guys also like to run well and develop good reputations rather than being an back marker...

If anyone thinks these team owners aren't drooling at the idea of getting parts wherever they want you're absolutely insane. It may not be what this is all about but you could bet on the fact Joe Gibbs and Rick Hendrick are sitting back just rubbing their hands together with a big evil grin just...

Has anyone mentioned the possibility of teams being able to use whatever parts they want causing lower funded teams to be much less competitive? Didn't we (in part) go to this system to lower costs for the teams? Have we not started seeing a lot of back markers start to run higher in the field...

There are definitely people around here wishing the worst for NASCAR .. always has been. I've been confused for years about why certain posters even bother watching or following the sport at all. I've taken many several month long hiatus' from even bothering to come here at all over the last...

Absolutely agree. In the end all we really want is some good racing. No matter what opinion any of us have about any of this. We all share that trait.

I wonder if people are familiar with what is going on with drake vs UMG and Spotify. This whole thing gives similar vibes to me. I'm looking forward to seeing what happens in the end for both.

Yeah I do want to point out that I received information after saying that that I had not up to that point. It seems the other teams are in fact more on board than it seemed.

I get that.. but also the absence of evidence is not evidence. I'm probably wrong. Doesn't really matter though. Maybe I'm not. Maybe sometimes I bring up certain talking points just to make conversation. The main thing that is important for me in all of this is pretty simple.. if the 22...

What's your point? Is that supposed to change my opinion? Because it doesn't. Why does everyone need to act like these threads are being admitted in court? We're not lawyers and none of what we talk about here matters at all. Don't worry, Michael Jordan will still be rich and we won't be...

Oh right, I forgot that the definition means I can't ask questions. Your opinion of my question is much more irrelevant than the question itself. If you don't want to answer it then keep to yourself please. It's already been answered so I have no interest in your response at this point. I'm...

My opinion has nothing to do with it. I didn't ask what antitrust means. My question was whether or not it would be possible for someone to start another, similar series.

This has taken an interesting turn. There's one thing Im curious about.. About NASCAR being the only premier stock car racing league. Is there anything stopping anyone from starting another one? If the answer is no, then what makes NASCAR a monopoly? Just the fact that it's the only one so...

Huh? Who said that? Not me.

Theres nothing in me that "doesn't want to know the truth". I'm not sure why people act like that. I prefer to base my opinions on facts and things I can see or hear. Me saying I've never heard it has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not it is true or has been said.. until hearing...

I mean what I said.. in all of racing. In any series. Drivers, team owners, crew chiefs, everyone. I have never heard someone say that. I'm not saying it has never been said, just that I personally have not heard it. I have heard many say that they're not in it for the money though.

...however... these guys are all multi millionaires thanks to nascar. Poor guys. It must suck. I wonder how much Reddick made last year 🤔

I've never heard anyone in racing say they're in it for the money.

Oh.. right.. so you're going along with the "absence of evidence" part then.. cool.. have fun with that 👍

Why is it so safe to assume negatively but not positively? Seems to be a trend here lately. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.

Three team owners, all with different answers. None of which seem to be supporting the teams suing. How about that.