Search results

Which they've done willingly and have been well compensated for.

So far the only thing I've seen that may be deemed illegal or uncompetive was the exclusivity deals signed a with SMI. Everything else appears to be a contract dispute. They said stuff about SRX but in reality they did nothing to harm them besides enforcement of exclusivity on the SMI tracks.

How many race car drivers built race tracks, negotiate billion dollar tv deals and spent 75 building the premiere stock car series with their own money?

This lawsuit reminds me a lot of what work is like for me. A group of us worked for a former employer and were sick of how it was run. A few quit and started another business and offered some of us jobs. The new company had no money so to raise funds they sold shares to the initial group of...

Your argument shows your bias terrible. This lawsuit has nothing to do with any manufacturer and really nothing to do with Rick. Like I said before if Rick had brought the exact same lawsuit you'd be on the other side

Sometimes not losing is harder than winning

RWR to Chevy. Kinda surprised me as they had been operating out of the RFK campus. Guess RCR needed someone after losing Kaulig https://www.jayski.com/2025/12/06/rick-ware-racing-to-switch-back-to-chevrolet/

In all fairness I dont think many of the owners have read the total agreement. That's why they have lawyers

Sounds like MJ was really hung up on with wanting a percentage of overall all nascar income. That way if NASCAR got more teams got more.

So if nascar is giving FRM approximately 12 mil a year and they're spending 14 mil a year on cars where else are you going to find a business that gives you 85% of operational costs up front?

Didn't they change the rule to allow more open cars after they lost the charters? Essentially making sure the make the show?

This was from Bob's article, but discussed elsewhere. I would have strongly objected to saying it should have been 6. Gives the jury the impression that nascar manipulated or screwed them out of the championship. Everyone played by the same rules

That's what I was thinking is it had more to do with Bell than anything

Wow at that age its such a tragedy

I was listening to the podcast this morning and this makes no sense to me. I think it would be key to the defense to say even though you didnt sign you were still allowed to race in our series?

The only issue that I have is telling the lawyers to speed it up after a week of the plaintiff presenting their case doesnt seem exactly fair. They spent too long making a case against you, so you get less time to defend yourself......

That one might hurt a little

Sure didn't seem like MJ was on the stand long? Guess besides his name he doesn't have much input on the matter

The difference is that AT&T was considered an essential service at the time. Nobody needs to be in nascar