Search results

  1. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    No one has posed the notion of a competing stock car series since SMI themselves did it. If you want to look for a reason why NASCAR would want SMI to agree to those terms, there you go.
  2. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    Are you asking about SMI or NASCAR? NASCAR not maintaining their physical plant because other people can rent it (given that other people HAVE been renting their facilities) would be a choice and an incredibly foolhardy one at that. Why would SMI choose to stop maintaining their facilities...
  3. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    They're performing the role of putting the race on that NASCAR is required to have in order to have their TV deal. There's no welfare there. That's a business deal. NASCAR isn't asking the teams for cost containment. They're asking for the teams to build anything goes cars for the All Star Race.
  4. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    Because you still have to put on races for your TV deal? Because the markets those tracks are in have long standing fanbases who are interested in NASCAR and are near media markets that are appealing to your partners? There is absolutely nothing requiring them to reduce the money they give the...
  5. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    That's correct based on what I quoted. Baseball's antitrust exemption is to other baseball leagues. It has nothing to do with other professional sports. I tried to help you on that. Not hard. But I tried.
  6. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    MLB does indeed have one. It is the only league that has such an exception. Let me give you a hint: The 45th and 47th President of the US famously was involved in an antitrust lawsuit which he was party to the winning side of. Amusingly he wound up getting screwed by jury instructions.
  7. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    I mean, where else would the money go? What is the necessity for NASCAR to do what you're prescribing and reduce the track fees because they no longer can demand exclusivity?
  8. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    Literally not a single part of that is true, LOL. Like so profoundly untrue and incorrect it is one of the funnier things I've ever read.
  9. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    This is solid gold. I hope you all are appreciating it.
  10. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    There's nothing that actually correlates those demands with the amount of money they receive from NASCAR. If NASCAR decreases the cut given to tracks and instead redirects that to teams, that has nothing to do with exclusivity.
  11. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    Yeah, couldn't even really get that either I suppose given that the response literally starts with "no," lmao. The knots this guy is tying himself into are incredible. Just let him cook.
  12. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    And admit being incorrect earlier? Surely, you jest! I'm already getting myself ready for the spin when the settlement comes through. Knowing our interactions here, you probably haven't heard about the folks out here that believe that they will be made not only whole but unimaginably rich...
  13. V

    23XI statement on not signing Charter agreement

    Some of you guys need to stop getting so mad at this and just laugh like I do.
Back
Top Bottom