America's war on cars and how it affects NASCAR

I got halfway through and found this video to be off base, but certainly worthy of provoking a discussion.

Slappy's trying to blame America's obsession with SUVs and big ass trucks on Obama policies.

IMO, the main reason people stopped buying sedans from Ford, Chevy and Dodge is because they've been notoriously unreliable for so long. I think most people who are going to buy a sedan for commuting to work and back are going to buy a Toyota Corolla. Or even a hybrid vehicle.

Big trucks are a culture thing.
 
Slappy's trying to blame America's obsession with SUVs and big ass trucks on Obama policies.
Government fuel fleet standards were inadvertently encouraging manufacturers to build trucks and SUVs long before Obama ran for his first office. By setting the overall minimum MPG for vehicles build on a truck chassis to be lower than cars, the government made it cheaper to build trucks instead of researching ways to improve car fuel economy. Since the big vehicles are where the profits are, that's what the advertising pushes, convincing people that's what they want.

But yeah, it doesn't help that quality standards for the former Big Three have been sliding for almost as long.
 
Government fuel fleet standards were inadvertently encouraging manufacturers to build trucks and SUVs long before Obama ran for his first office. By setting the overall minimum MPG for vehicles build on a truck chassis to be lower than cars, the government made it cheaper to build trucks instead of researching ways to improve car fuel economy.

But yeah, it doesn't help that quality standards for the former Big Three have been sliding for almost as long.

2022 was the tell tale sign that Americans won't buy cars anymore. Gas was $4/gallon and people were still buying trucks and preferred complaining about gas prices than downsizing.
 
2022 was the tell tale sign that Americans won't buy cars anymore. Gas was $4/gallon and people were still buying trucks and preferred complaining about gas prices than downsizing.
Yeah, I've never gotten that. I know so many people with what appear to me to be more vehicle than they'll ever need. No kids, nothing to tow, rolling full time in a Silverado Pavement Princess.
 
Yeah, I've never gotten that. I know so many people with what appear to me to be more vehicle than they'll ever need. No kids, nothing to tow, rolling full time in a Silverado Pavement Princess.

I've had people who have these big ass trucks ask to borrow mine to haul scrap or something because they don't want to scratch the bed of their truck.

They're glorified minivans designed to look masculine.
 
He forgot to say 2 years later in 2011 (Obama) CAFE relations were changed and tightened for his B.S. story. People buy what they want to buy. Trucks are now majority 4 doors can carry 5 or 6 pretty comfortably, can tow a small house and some SUV's aren't far behind.
I he forgot to mention that this current administration relaxed the EPA's regulations of methane gas pollution a gift to big oil and not a peep was said about the growing EV/Hybrid market.
 
He forgot to say 2 years later in 2011 (Obama) CAFE relations were changed and tightened for his B.S. story.
I didn't forget it; I didn't know it. Thanks for the correction, although not for the incorrect assumption.
People buy what they want to buy
Agreed, but no one should expect the price of gas to be what it was when they made their purchase. Commodities don't work like that.
 
GM isn't hurting
The automaker raised its guidance once again. GM now expects adjusted earnings of $13 billion to $15 billion; net income of $10 billion to $11.4 billion; more free cash flow and capital spending in the $10.5 billion to $11.5 billion range which bodes well for future products.

Ford doesn't appear to be hurting either.
Ford Motor announced Q3 2025 earnings on October 23, 2025, reporting an EPS of $0.45, which topped the consensus estimate of $0.38 by $0.07. Quarterly revenue rose 9.4% year-over-year to $50.53 billion, above analysts' expectations of $43.08 billion. With a trailing EPS of $1.16 and a P/E Ratio of 11.06, Ford Motor's earnings are expected to grow 4.76% next year, from $1.47 to $1.54 per share.
 
Yeah, I've never gotten that. I know so many people with what appear to me to be more vehicle than they'll ever need. No kids, nothing to tow, rolling full time in a Silverado Pavement Princess.
Like my old neighbor. He went from a Honda civic to a 6.2L Trail Boss lol! I don't even think he owns a trailer hitch
 
Nothing written in stone, but Motor Trend is writing stories about it.

1763933359956.png
 
It isn't beyond the realm of possibility that future Nascar's will be modeled after EV's or Hybrids. They are fast as hell some of them and they look like grandmas grocery getter.
I've long wondered why NASCAR hasn't moved its race trucks to the top series. Those are what customers want, and what drive the manufacturers' profits, not limited production niche vehicles. (Not to mention that would resolve so many aero problems!)
 
I've long wondered why NASCAR hasn't moved its race trucks to the top series. Those are what customers want, and what drive the manufacturers' profits, not limited production niche vehicles. (Not to mention that would resolve so many aero problems!)
Same here. I think the traditional fan would have a cat probably.
 
I've long wondered why NASCAR hasn't moved its race trucks to the top series. Those are what customers want, and what drive the manufacturers' profits, not limited production niche vehicles. (Not to mention that would resolve so many aero problems!)
Pretty sure that is one of the reasons Heim has been stuck in the Truck series for so long.
 
I thought a lot of the reason sedans went away was because of insurance and EPA rules. It was always more expensive to insure a coup than a sedan. Then when SUVs got popular, sedans became more expensive to insure. Then the EPA came along and said coups, sedans had to meet certain mpg but SUVs didn't. And that killed the sedan. Now, all cars are being made bigger to be considered in the next higher class but have smaller engines to meet mpg regs. Its how the "small" trucks came about. The Colorado, ranger, etc are the same size as a year 2000 F150 but only have a 4 cylinder turbo in them now. The original Colorado, Rangers, etc used to be the size of a current Traverse or Explorer, or even slightly smaller than those which also have 4 cy turbos.
 
I have a car and prefer to drive a car even though my wife's SUV drives more like a car than our first SUV from '03. Most SUV's are built on car chassis. Most ride and drive like a car. They sit higher up, which is one of the reasons why I hear people say they don't want to go back to the car. I'm still hoping it's a cyclical thing.

As far as trucks, I think for a lot of truck owners it's about waving the biggest thing they have that's not in their pants. Many of today's trucks won't fit into a normal parking space. I hate trying to get around or park next to one in a lot or a garage.
 
Sedans are probably dead. Hatchbacks have more utility. That's ultimately the reason for it.
 
I got halfway through and found this video to be off base, but certainly worthy of provoking a discussion.

Actual analysis is a weak point for Slap. I remember a video where he argued that Greenville, SC deserved a track because they had five within a 2.5 hour drive. That’s not the conclusion that his data supported. If anything, it’s an a huge argument against Greenville having a track.

He’s a passable researcher, his work on finding information about Air Base Speedway was pretty great. I have also watched videos of his where I have been able to follow along on Wikipedia.

He also leans way too heavily into the “I am a real race fan because I hate the playoffs.” I have never found his analysis on the playoffs to be sufficient to support his conclusions, especially when he makes videos with inflammatory titles that say that NASCAR is chipping away at the “dam of legitimacy.”

Just my opinion.
 
Back
Top Bottom