Announcement soon on track in New York City?

W

WideOpenPhoto

Guest
NASCAR.com


JOLIET, Ill. (AP) -- Start spreading the news, NASCAR could be in New York soon.

NASCAR chairman Brian France said Sunday he hopes to have an announcement "in the next month or so" for a track in the New York City area. NASCAR has looked at several sites in the area, with Staten Island discussed more than any other.

"There's a lot of momentum in that market," France said. "What I know is they're a lot closer than they were just six months ago. And I think you'll see some positive announcements come, it would be my hope, in the next month or so."

Though it still has many tracks where it was born, in the Southeast, NASCAR has been on an aggressive expansion program over the last decade to increase its fan base and popularity.

The series has added 10 races at new tracks in the Northeast, Midwest and West since 1994, including two in the Los Angeles area and one outside Chicago.

In addition to a track in New York, NASCAR has said it is looking for a site in the Pacific Northwest -- most likely Washington or Oregon. And France said Sunday that the Chicagoland Speedway, site of Sunday's Tropicana 400, could get a second race.

"You can't leave your core fan base on your way to another one, that wouldn't make any sense. There are plenty of races in the Southeast, there are always going to be," France said. "We do have to take the sport, from time to time, where we can impact a bigger audience."

A second race at Chicagoland Speedway, about 45 miles southwest of downtown, would help increase NASCAR's visibility. NASCAR makes only a handful of stops in the Midwest, with Indianapolis and Michigan the closest tracks to Chicago.

The Tropicana 400 has sold out all four years, and France said Chicago is NASCAR's eighth-largest television market.

"It certainly is a candidate for realignment because it's the third-largest market in the country," France said of Chicago's overall TV standing. "It has some constraints because of the weather issues, what time of year you can come. But it would be a candidate to be considered."

With 36 races already on its schedule, though, NASCAR is at or near its limit. To put a second race in Chicago -- or have races in New York or the Pacific Northwest -- NASCAR would have to take a race from somewhere else.

When the track in Fontana, Calif., got a second race last year, NASCAR simply moved one from Darlington, S.C.

But before fans become outraged at the possibility of losing their favorite race, France said NASCAR will be sensitive when the time does come for realignment.

"We are not going to just unilaterally start pulling dates and putting them here and there or anywhere we feel like it," France said. "Tracks have historical dates, they're our business partners.

"They can't be looking over their shoulders wondering when we're going to pull a date, like some other motor sports divisions have done in recent years. That's a failed policy and we won't do that."
 
I heard rumors a while back of NASCAR wanting to build a track near Bridgewater New York. That's just south of me, but it would be pointless because no one around here is rich enough to buy a ticked. It would be a good way for nascar to make good money.
 
So what track is going to lose a date. My bet is Martinsville.
 
Originally posted by racerx11@Jul 13 2004, 02:30 PM
So what track is going to lose a date. My bet is Martinsville.
That is what I was thinking. If they add a date to Chicagoland. Then would Darlington lose their race?
 
Loudon, Pocono, or Dover.........one of those will lose a date.
 
Unfortunatly, I don't think NASCAR will take a date from Louden. Remember, NASCAR only gave the 1 date and Bob bought half of N. Wilksboro for his second date. Plus he's been real willing to spend whatever money to try and improve the racing at that track. I just don't see that happening.
 
Good point about NH, he has spent a lot of dollars to make that track better, but if NY gets a date that will be 3 dates in the same market area. Louden isn't that far from NY City, only about 3/12 hours, not much by todays' standards of travel.
 
Originally posted by Mopardh9@Jul 14 2004, 04:53 AM
Good point about NH, he has spent a lot of dollars to make that track better, but if NY gets a date that will be 3 dates in the same market area. Louden isn't that far from NY City, only about 3/12 hours, not much by todays' standards of travel.
That's true M9, but being from NE if I had the choice of which track to go to it would be Louden NH. I'd never go to a NYC track, the traffic is bad enough under normal circumstances, no way would I go to an event like this. Besides NH draws lot of Canadians too, and from where they're coming from it's a lot more than 3 1/2 hours.
 
As much as I hate to say it I'd have to say Martinsville will be the one to lose a Date. Now that ISC has bought Martinsville :(
 
pocono's major saving grace is their proximity to new york city...only about 100 miles, and a bit closer than watkins glen is. i think pocono poses a unique challenge to the teams and i hope they stay on the schedule...but it isn't the type of exciting track nascare wants to have, and might be expendable if they build a new track in nyc.

as far as the track is concerned...hopefully the prices around nyc would force a short track to get built, instead of another 1.5 mile tri-oval. if they built a .8 mile, irl could race there, too...no need for a big "dual use" facility.

but then, if they do build a short track, they might feel that it would soften the blow of taking a date from martinsville...which would suck.
 
Back
Top Bottom