S
SuperChuck5
Guest
I was just checking out the 11th Circuit's file system. It looks like AT&T moved for rehearing and the Court denied it. The system shows the case closed (meaning the appeal of the injunction is now closed- the trial court case on the other issues is still open).
I think this means the AT&T logo will be off the 31 car in Bristol.
From 11th Circuit's filing system:
08/20/2007 Petition for Rehearing: (Atty: Nathan L. Garroway) AT&T Mobility, LLC No
08/21/2007 The PFR filed by Appellee AT&T Mobility LLC is GRTD to the extent that the last sent of the Court's opinion is amended to read... The mandate shall issue forthwith. see f/f PTF No
08/21/2007 CASE CLOSED-Mandate Issued No
08/21/2007 Mandate Issued No
08/21/2007 MDT1 (Letter issuing mandate) issued. To:James N. Hatten; c:Colin S. Stretch; caniel Bird; caniel M. Perry; cavid L. Balser; cavid R. Gelfand; c:Jenifer E. Niedenthal; c:Michael K. Kellogg; c:Michael Kovaka; c:Nathan L. Garroway; carker H. Bag+ No
08/21/2007 MOT2 (Notice of court action) issued. caniel Bird; cavid L. Balser; c:Jenifer E. Niedenthal; carker H. Bagley; ceter Canfield; c:Susan Haller No
I think this means the AT&T logo will be off the 31 car in Bristol.
From 11th Circuit's filing system:
08/20/2007 Petition for Rehearing: (Atty: Nathan L. Garroway) AT&T Mobility, LLC No
08/21/2007 The PFR filed by Appellee AT&T Mobility LLC is GRTD to the extent that the last sent of the Court's opinion is amended to read... The mandate shall issue forthwith. see f/f PTF No
08/21/2007 CASE CLOSED-Mandate Issued No
08/21/2007 Mandate Issued No
08/21/2007 MDT1 (Letter issuing mandate) issued. To:James N. Hatten; c:Colin S. Stretch; caniel Bird; caniel M. Perry; cavid L. Balser; cavid R. Gelfand; c:Jenifer E. Niedenthal; c:Michael K. Kellogg; c:Michael Kovaka; c:Nathan L. Garroway; carker H. Bag+ No
08/21/2007 MOT2 (Notice of court action) issued. caniel Bird; cavid L. Balser; c:Jenifer E. Niedenthal; carker H. Bagley; ceter Canfield; c:Susan Haller No