Bobby Allison

D

dsdjtlts

Guest
FIGHTING FOR SURVIVAL

Cover Story: Back when publicity was precious, Bobby Allison was the most controversial and outspoken NASCAR driver of his time

By ED HINTON
Orlando Sentinel
8/26/2005

Bobby Allison wants to start a pension fund for retired NASCAR drivers. At 67, he should be the poster boy.
There is no greater driver in greater need. Just this spring, he paid off the last of the medical bills from his career-ending injuries of 1988. His only guaranteed income is his Social Security check.

"That certainly is a very welcome help, but it doesn't match the need at the moment," he said last Sunday, standing inside Michigan International Speedway, virtually unnoticed by current-generation drivers, crewmen, officials, corporate CEOs and fans.

"At the moment" was a phrase he added out of pride. Bobby Allison has been broke for 17 years.

He has sold or lost virtually everything he owned. He had insurance, but one company refused to pay and another's agent absconded with the claim money.

All of this was a mere backdrop for his unspeakable sorrow, the deaths of his two racing sons, Clifford at Michigan in 1992, and Davey in a helicopter crash at Talladega, Ala., in '93.

Bobby never retired from driving - the brain-stem injury at Pocono in '88, which nearly killed him, left him disabled.

Now he can't retire at all.

"I still have to go do something here and there to generate some income," he said. "I'm fortunate that people want me to come do trade shows," for which he receives small appearance fees. And he attends fairs and other events on behalf of Miller Brewing Co., his sponsor at the time of his injury.

So at least some remember him and care - which is more than has been shown by NASCAR itself, or by its current drivers.

At least he can "buy the toys I want. . . . I don't buy big toys anymore." To today's drivers, "toys" means Lear and Gulfstream jets, helicopters, yachts, Lamborghinis. To Allison, it means "fishing poles, and things for my boat," an aluminum skiff with an 8-hp outboard motor.

So he is no worse off than millions of aging Americans who didn't and/or couldn't prepare adequately for retirement, or were robbed of their pensions by corporate wickedness.

It just seems that living legends deserve better.

Allison won 85 races, including three Daytona 500s, and the Winston Cup of 1983. He brought NASCAR untold attention, back when publicity was precious, as the most controversial and outspoken driver of his time.

In a sport whose color was built on grudges, payback, fender-banging and seat-of-the-pants engineering, Allison was the best there has been in all those categories.

The chassis that make today's cars corner so well, and make winners of today's drivers, are in place because Allison was 40 years ahead of his time. So adamantly did he advocate the "front-steer" chassis that he fell out with the other great innovator of the time, car owner Junior Johnson, and they broke up as a team.

Had Johnson listened, had they stayed together, "we'd have won 200 races, and Richard Petty wouldn't have," Johnson would say later.

Allison landed the most punches in the notorious fight - him vs. Cale Yarborough, with Allison's brother Donnie trying to break them up - immediately after the 1979 Daytona 500, the race NASCAR czar Bill France Jr. often has called NASCAR's first great milestone in the public consciousness.

Behind the scenes, Allison gave away incalculable dollars to injured and/or needy drivers and their families, always exacting promises they wouldn't divulge the name of their benefactor publicly. I was told of his generosity privately by such families for decades.

When NASCAR was confined almost solely to the Southeast, Allison traveled nationwide to race on weeknights at little tracks from California to Minnesota to New England, giving locals something of NASCAR to approach and shake hands with. He was the first to spread the popularity to other regions.

And Allison advocated what to NASCAR were unthinkable measures, such as catastrophic health insurance for drivers. Only as he lay near death in Pennsylvania, unconscious, hemorrhaging his personal funds by the hour, did NASCAR take up the concept.

So, arguably, there is no driver to whom the current generation owes more.

But there are no rear-view mirrors on Lears and Gulfstreams. The new guys don't look back, let alone turn back to help the men who built for them an arena for fortune-making.

That is the singular shame of NASCAR's rise to mainstream popularity and enormous wealth.

To initiate a pension fund, "the first thought I had was to get a loan from somewhere, and invest in the proper kind of market fund," Allison said. "It would "yield' very small payments, but, see, a lot of us old guys are used to really small payments."

If you wonder why NASCAR as a company doesn't have a driver pension fund - and probably never will - you don't understand the business model. Drivers are considered "independent contractors," NASCAR's unyielding euphemism for shirking responsibility for driver injury or death on the job, or well-being off the job. Worker relations are modeled, as one college professor has put it, after southern cotton mills of the 1930s, and that callousness is unlikely to change.

As for the current drivers, it's not that they're uncharitable. We have seen, up close, Jeff Gordon's sincerity as he makes little faces beam in the Make a Wish Foundation program for children with terminal illnesses. Tony Stewart has been at the vanguard of drivers' most monumental charitable effort, the Victory Junction Gang Ranch, founded by Kyle and Pattie Petty in memory of their late son Adam.

Not to detract at all from these endeavors, but shouldn't these drivers also embrace their own? The ones who made NASCAR the mother lode it is today?

If current drivers would contribute just another tiny fraction of their time and money to a pension seed fund, Bobby Allison wouldn't have to go looking for a loan "from somewhere."
 
My gawd, I'm so sick of all this "Pension fund for the drivers" crap!

NASCAR drivers are now, and have always been, independent contractors. As such, it is up to them to make any arrangements for such things as health and medical insurance coverage, life insurance, and their own retirement.

The only folks we see making any issue of this are the ones who failed to make the necessary correct business decissions while they were on the way to the top of the heap.

Yes, it's sad that guys like Allison have hit upon hard times because of injuries received while racing.
But, nobody forced them to strap into a race car.

Nobody forced them to not buy catastrophic injury insurance.

Nobody forced them to make poor business and investment decisions before (and after) they were unable to continue to drive.

What folks, including Ed Hinton, overlook is the fact that all these drivers are working for themselves, not for NASCAR, not for the team owners, not for the track owners and not for the fans.

They are self employed; they are very well paid, even the "old timers" when you compare their earnings to the average wage of the time, and the license agreement they signed in order to compete makes their own responsibility very clear.

Sorry, but I simply cannot feel sorry for some of the highest paid kids (and they are all nothing more than overgrown kids at heart) in the country, who are making their money playing at what they love best, when they end up broke because of their own bad judgement.

Bobby Allison was a past Winston Cup champion; with proper investments and financial management he should have come through his medical and financial hard times with nothing to worry about.

He, and others in the same position, have only themselves to blame. Like any other businessman who makes poor investment decisions.
 
Thankyou Bob......Bravo. I have been unable to put into words like you did. Exactly what I think.
 
I don't think Bobby was a highest paid kid...30 year career about 8 million in purse money..and purse money is not the drivers paycheck. Maybe he got 40% of that, maybe not, but if he did thats about $80,000 a year, not a lot of money with a family and a household to run, not to mention the money he loaned out and never got back. Maybe he did plan for the future but with the accident his future came sooner than he had planned. It happens sometimes, no matter how much we plan we can't predict tomorrow. He had insurance, but just cause you got it- don't mean they will pay out.
I read a story once about Jody Ridley, how he was seriously injured at a track (Dover I think) he said his team didn't even visit him in the hospital, and, in fact, the transporter rolled out of town with his street clothes and his wallet. He had nothing but the hospital gown he was wearing..until Bobby Allison showed up with some clothes for him..signed him out and flew him home. Maybe Bobby's generosity helped put him in the position he is in now.
Do I think Nascar "owes" him...no I don't..but it would be nice if the Nascar 'family" would take care of their own. And, I won't mention how sad it is that some people think that's not appropriate.
 
I'm quite aware of what the driver's receive as their percentage of the purse.

You figure Bobby was making around $80,000 a year, average?
This was at a time when the average wage earner might have been making between $10,000-$15,000 a year. Pretty doggone good earnngs if you ask me.

Fact is that Bobby, along with so many other early NASCAR drivers, simply didn't know how to invest their money and instead of hiring someone to advise them, spent it faster than they could bring it in.

Even after Bobby got back on his feet, he continued to live that same life style. He spent millions of his own (and his sponsor's) money trying to field a Cup team. Much of the money wasted on what at the time was one of the fanciest facilities in the business instead of hiring the help who could have made his team successful.

Now he has to depend on his Social Security check.

Because of some unplanned medical problems, so don't I.

I've found that by making a few lifestyle changes and minor adjustments in spending habits, my wife and I should be OK.
There's no more race cars or private airplanes, no boats and fancy pick-up trucks.
But we're getting along fine with just one vehicle, we've got some small income from our property and still have enough to lend the kids a few bucks when they end up short between paydays.

NO, I simply can't feel sorry for someone who has had the world in their hands and because of their own shortsightedness, even if they're the most generous person in the world, are complaining about their financial situation.

They created it themselves.
 
Same with us..though I am quite positive our unexpected medical expenses don't come close to brain stem surgery and rehab. Yes he was shortsighted...no doubt about that..but, we all, when the money is available spend unwisely...only after it starts dwindling do we realize there are many things we can live just fine without.
And I don't think Bobby is complaining I think the author of the article is.

I still feel sorry for him
 
The bane of NASCAR is no driver's union. If the drivers would follow the model of the NFL, they'd be assured a safe retirement, one looked out for by the league itself. Also, better rules, more concise and to the point, instead of this vague crap word-game NASCAR plays weekly.

Now, old-schoolers liek Bob are gonna lambast me because 'that's not what NASCAR is about" and "they're independent contractors' blah blah blah. Bottom line, the owners, NASCAR and sponsors end up with more control if there are set union rules. As well as a better drug testing system, clearly there's need for it (Hmeil).

Everyone would benefit if the drivers would take more control and quit being pawns for the France family. Now, we're supposed to see a 'new NASCAR car'? NASCAR's no longer about racing - it's an entertainment event, period, put on by the France family weekly to line their pockets. And if you don't play by their rules, they'll cut you out of their business model (see Kentucky Speedway).

I sort of went off on a tangent there, sorry, point is - if the drivers and even the owners, took the control they truly have - every sunday would be a lot better, and all the sundays after that for the guys that leave.

- K y l e
 
Kyle, funny you should mention union and NASCAR together. If you aren't aware of the fact, the hot shot drivers decided that they would boycott the first race at Taladega because the didn't think it was safe. NASCAR told them go ahead and found others who would race for them.

I've been reading this thread and the article that went along with it and while I can sympathize with Bobby and all that he's gone through, I can say that he has lived twice as long as the famous Fireball Roberts. He's enjoyed life longer than what some say is the best ever driver in the sport...need I mention his name? I do know that Bobby feels blessed that he has what he has now and has dealt with the deaths of his two sons and a marriage that went south because of all that and back again after the death of Adam Petty brought them together again. I think that if anyone could chat with him, you wouldn't hear a complaint from him at all. It's like someone here said, the write of the article and many other sympathecals feel much more sorry for him than he does.

If NASCAR owes Bobby something, what do the current and former drivers who have made their livings from NASCAR owe the Frances? It works both ways here. NASCAR, love it or hate it, has and does give people a chance at making millions. Just today, while coming back home from a renaisance faire close to Concord, we passed by Childress' vinyards and signs to his chops and museum. I said to the wife, isn't it funny that forty years ago, Richard was nothing but a mechanic that loved to race and didn't have much more than an old run down garage from where he made his living. He certainly didn't make his money driving a car, but was in the right place and was given the opertunity to make it big. He did and boy did he make it big. I ask you, does NASCAR owe anything to Richard Childress? Richard could, if given the opportunity, almost buy NASCAR or at least a very big part of it. I'd much rather think that Richard Childress owes his life and all that he has to NASCAR. But then again, NASCAR didn't hand him a thing but rather offered him the opportunity to make money.
 
I think you summed it up pretty well, Buckster. We all know that the media people make a bunch of $$$$ as a whole and will slant about anything to sell their story. As you know, I'm one who USED TO say Na$cash, but I have lived and learned. Sure, I still get ticked off at some decisions NASCAR makes, question others, and have even learned to like The Chase.
We "fans" know far less than we claim to and are a danged opinionated bunch, but WE LOVE OUR FAVORITE SPORT.
A childhood friend was a race car driver, didn't make the "Big Leagues", and took his passion for the sport to a different level. He is a mechanical engineer, self employed and doing OK.
 
When I see fans complain about the lack of consistant rules in NASCAR, I have to laugh in their faces because they're showing just how little they really know about the business, what it is and how it is run.

The current rule book is around 200 pages, very plainly written, and technical bulletins are issued as often as NASCAR feels they are needed.

Those who need to know, know. Simple as that!

A driver's union?
What for?
These kids are multi-millionaires playing at what they'd gladly pay to play. Indeed, most of them did just that in order to get to the upper levels of the business.
If a multi-millionaire is unable to plan for his own retirement or a career ending injury, he should at least be smart enough to hire someone to do that for him.

NASCAR's given these guys the chance to make that kind of money, if they're not smart enough to make wise decisions on spending it, isn't that their problem?

Make no mistake about NASCAR being a business. It is not a sport, but a sports-entertainment business with the primary intent of making money.
That was the reason that Bill France Sr. and the other owners and drivers formed the organization in 1947. They were trying to insure getting paid for the show they put on for the fans, they were trying to organize in order to build a better product, to have a nationally known organization to sell to the promoters so they could charge more for that show and they wanted to make stockcar racing as popular or even more so, than openwheel racing.
It's taken three generations of the France family to achieve those goals, if they're not there yet, they're certainly getting close.
They've amassed a fortune as well as creating quite a few other rather wealthy folks along the way.
There are many early drivers who retired from driving to enter the business world and have done rather well for themselves in those endeavors as well.

And some uninformed fans feel they drivers and owners are getting short changed?
Yeah, right!

Kentucky Speedway? I'm not sure how that snuck in here, but the owners were told before any dirt was moved that NASCAR had no interest in bringing the top division into that marketing area. Those same owners went ahead and built their track and now want he courts to tell a private business how to operate that business.

Wrong answer, my friend!

Do you honestly feel that races are handed out without considerable market studies being conducted? That did happen years ago, but that was years ago.
There's just too much money involved for NASCAR, or any other business for that matter, to operate in such a manner today.
 
Back
Top Bottom