DW Calls for Track Czar

  • Thread starter Thread starter HardScrabble
  • Start date Start date
H

HardScrabble

Guest
Or maybe he needs to call the waaaaambulance.

Sometimes racing conditions are less than ideal. Sometimes teams have the set-ups off, somtimes the drivers just plain old fashioned screw up.

Richmond had a rash of cautions early in the race, so did Bristol. Much of what the fool writng this post saw was as easily attributed to heavy right feet and impatience as track conditions. This same poster saw an awful ot of passing both on the inside and the outside during the majority of the race. he also observed several different racing lines being used by drivers turning very fast laps.

One statement of DW's that seems way out of place is the racing the track is not racing one. Ever raced at Darlington DW?

Enough of my BS, the story:

NASCAR needs to set track standards
Racing the track and not other drivers isn't racing

Sept. 9, 2002 2:30 a.m. ET
BY DARRELL WALTRIP
FOXSports.com

Saturday night's prerace show was incredible. It made me proud of my sport and the people in my sport. It was an outstanding tribute to all the people who were involved in the 9/11 incident last year.

I was sitting there, watching this prerace show and thinking about the 100,000-plus fans and all the drivers -- the young guys and veterans -- who have incredible personalities. We've got great sponsors. We've got a great TV package. More and more and more people are seeing the sport every week.

I was thinking about how fortunate we are in this sport. We're just so blessed in so many ways.

They cranked the engines, and we've got two rookies on the front row. You've got a great points battle going on. It just couldn't get any better.

Then they dropped the green flag, and the race didn't go two or three laps before cars spun and hit the wall. Wouldn't you know that one of them would be points leader Sterling Marlin? The 40 car was the first one out of the race. It just made me sick.
It's a shame to have so much going so well for us in this sport and then we have to go to a racetrack that's been suspect since the May race at Richmond. Drivers complained about this track and how there was no grip in the sealer. I know there was some testing, but I don't think any changes were made to the track.
Next week, we've got to go to another track -- New Hampshire -- that the drivers complained about in July. Most of them just wanted to pick up and go home the last time that they were there. As far as I know, there hasn't been a lot done to that racetrack either.

What a shame it is for the TV audience and the people at the track who get robbed of great racing because people who own and run these racetracks are allowed to do whatever they want to them. That's totally wrong.

The tracks have to become accountable for screwing up the racetrack and messing up the races. I want the drivers to compete against each other. I want to see driver against driver, car against car, crew against crew. I don't want to see teams taken out because adverse track conditions created by the owner. The most disgusting thing that I hear about sealer is that it makes the track last longer. It might make the track last longer, but you can't race on it. There's something wrong with that picture.

NASCAR needs track czar

NASCAR has to come up with an operations director or committee who goes to these racetracks and says, "I'm sorry old buddy, but if you don't change your track before the race, we're going to pull your sanction." I'll bet you that would get people's attention.
Car owners and drivers didn't change their ways when NASCAR fined them so they had to discipline drivers by taking away points. NASCAR has to do the same thing to some of these racetracks. They're going to have to say, " Either fix it, or we're going to take your sanction away." They've got to play hardball because we can't keep going to racetracks that you can't race on.
That's not being unreasonable, and I'm not trying to start any huge controversy. I'm a race fan. I'm sitting at home, wanting to watch a great race. I don't want to see drivers get out and complain about a track that they can't pass on because there's only one groove. That's not what racing is all about.

As I was watching the first wreck on Saturday night, I asked myself, "Why do we have to go to racetracks that are not prepared properly?"

NASCAR is telling the teams that they're going to have a new body location. All bodies have to be located on the same spot next year. That's going to cost the teams millions of dollars. But at the same time, NASCAR lets owners seal a racetrack and create unsafe and unacceptable racing conditions.

We need standards. We need pit road standards. For example, pit boxes need to be a certain size. Walls need to be in certain places and built certain ways at each track. With as much emphasis on safety as we've had over the last two years, we need to have a similar laser-like focus on racetrack design and operation.

The sport has to do it, and the fans and race teams deserve it.
 
I dunno HS. I can see where DW has a strong point with this. A lot of these tracks are putting sealer down every year or two so that they can save themselves the money of having to repave the tracks quite so often. NASCAR does need someone in charge of watching over the tracks and making sure that the racing surface is not constantly being changed just because they want to save a little money in the long haul.
 
I can't say it loud enough, often enough, or emphatically enough: SHUT THE F**K UP JAWS!!!! Nobody CARES what you think. Can you not get that simple point through your thick skull? Nobody died and made you Oh Great Wise And All Knowing Racing Guru. You were a coward as a driver, and you are a putz as a commentator/writer. Do the racing world a favor and crawl back into whatever hole you were in before Fox Sports handed you a microphone. You cried as a driver until you got your restrictor plate, effectively creating the biggest mess this sport will ever face...and NOW you're going to fix all of it's problems?! There are not words in the English language to adequately describe what a total waste of internal organs you are.

(Gee, TWF, tell us what you REALLY think.)

Richmond was one of the more competitive races we have had lately. Two grooves, if a driver was man enough to use them. Loudon sucks. I know it, the drivers know it, the fans know it, and even a blithering idiot like Jaws knows it. Sterling was involved in an early accident. Guess what: That's Racin'. Look at a map of Tennessee, folks. Find Franklin, Jaws' hometown, to my eternal disgrace. Find Columbia, Sterling's hometown. Short leap of faith as to the motivation behind Jaws' rant, huh? About 25 miles. It's a 36 race season. All of the drivers have a bad race or three. Sterling went out early at Sears Point; where was Jaws crybabying about that track? Oh, that's right, he got PAID for that race, didn't he? His name was already in the news, unlike Richmond, where not one of us was sitting there watching the race and saying to ourselves, "Gee, I wonder what Darrell thinks?"

(Deep breaths, TWF, deeeeeeep breaths.)

The sooner we get this moron COMPLETELY out of racing, the better. Every time he opens his prodigious mouth, he makes a bigger dolt out of himself.
 
Settle down Ward-Fan, your blood pressure is going through the roof.
sauer010.gif
 
While I'll admit that Louden is probably the slickest track on the circuit, how is it the tracks fault that the boys have gotten so used good grip and banking that they seem to no longer be able to set a car up to handle it, or have the patience to drive it?

The important thing is the tracks remain the same. Louden is slick. It's always been slick. Camber that right front, lower the air pressure, and plan on changing lots of tires if yer so dern worried about sliding up. But don't plan on winning.

The guy that wins at Louden is the one that can drive on edge. And ain't that what racing is all about?

Oh I forgot, it's a traveling billboard show now. Whatever was I thinking?
 
Well ya see BC here's the prob with that IMO.

Richmond has put down sealer every year for as long as I can remember. Every single fall. How many times has it been a big problem? Obvioulsy not very many. Read the majority of the drivers opinions about Richmond as a whole and you'll find it is one of the favorites. What happened this spring? Nobody relly seems to know if it was the sealer, the tires, a combination of the tow, or what. NASCAR doesn't know, the sealing manufacturer and installer doesn't know, The drivers don't know, the CC don't know, Goodyear doesn't know.....see my point? How would a track czar know after the fact much less predict it? And a one time problem would be cause for what course of action, take Richmond off the schedule? Ridiculous!!

Virtually rewrite all of the above for Loudon, except they don't change every year and it was not sealer. Who knew what was gonna happen with the new pavement? Has the surface at Loudon been an issue in the past? Not to my recollection. Some folks don't care for the racing there and some drivers don't like the track (I would wager that Jeff Burton thinks it a pretty good track) but those complaints don't center around the surface.

Rockingham and Darlington eat tires, should those tracks have to change too? Almost every track on the circuit has one time or another been described as slick. It is just one of those things that happens.

I happen to like ol DW, but I just don't think he thought this one out. A track czar would be not be able to predict track conditions such as he points to any better than a weather czar could help prevent rain delays and rain outs.
 
TN-Ward-Fan, if nobody cares what Waltrip thinks, how come someone like you gets so adament about him saying what he thinks? I don't agree with everything that he was saying by a long shot, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have a right to his opinion. Someone must have cared enough if they decided to post it. At least he is saying what he thinks about the topic rather than just saying how the track officials are a total waste of organs.

I've seen some good posts from you, but you really have to grow up on this one. If you want to dispute what he says, great, share it so we can all benefit. If you just want to spout off how much you dislike him, do us a favor and waste someone else's time.
 
Originally posted by rpmallen
If you want to dispute what he says, great, share it so we can all benefit. If you just want to spout off how much you dislike him, do us a favor and waste someone else's time.

Point taken.

But before an effective rebuttal can be given, I think it is topical to point out why I think his opinions are crap. Which I did, so we will move on.

Jaws has the extremely annoying habit of seeing himself as something more important than he really is. He always has. Thus, for him to propose a solution to anything is silly at best, preposterous at worst. First, why the title Czar? Is this Russia? Why not Director of Venue Operations or some such?

Second, who gets this job? Surely not HIM. What qualifications should this person have? Engineering? Track ownership? Paving business? Physics? Should driving experience count, or leave it all at the academic level?

Third, what authority do we hand this person? Who checks against under the table money? Who does he/she report to?

Fourth, does NASCAR not already have someone or a group of people who already do this? If so, how's THAT working for them? If not, why? Why haven't the drivers/team owners demanded accountability from the track owners?

Finally, have we all forgotten the main reason there are two races a year at Loudon in the first place? $$$$$$$ in someone's pocket. North Wilkesboro was closed so this place could have the dates. North Wilkesboro needed some work...the surface was rough and poorly patched, the pit area and infield were woefully small and ill equipped, there were not enough seats, and no feasible way to expand it. All true enough. But this place ain't no better. Axe it, give a date each to Kentucky and Nashville, and move on.

I apologize if my rant offended anyone. I meant every word of it, but I'll be PC for once. The very thought of anything he says being taken seriously terrifies me. The last time NASCAR listened to him, we got the plates. I don't think we need any more input from him.
 
Nothing against your argument Ward-Fan but your obviously biased whenever it comes to something that D.W. has to say no matter if he is right or wrong. I've seen you rant on him before and you have a hatred towards him like no other for whatever reasons you have. So to be honest with you, when I saw that you replied to this post I didn't even read yours because I already knew what you were going to say. Nothing against you, just stating that I don't think your the most credible person to argue something that D.W. has written about because you never even give him a chance before you've read what he has to say.
 
Back
Top Bottom