Field size could be problem in 2007

tkj24

Team Owner
Joined
Oct 5, 2001
Messages
7,877
Points
398
Location
Tennessee
By Dan Beaver, Yahoo! Sports
January 31, 2007




Forget the changes to the 2007 Chase for the Nextel Cup and the Car of Tomorrow, forget about Toyota entering the top level of American stock car racing, even put aside for a moment the defection of Formula One ace Juan Pablo Montoya and Champ Car standout A.J. Allmendinger.

NASCAR's biggest storyline of 2007 – as well as its biggest challenge – is going to be the massive car counts each weekend.

Before the start of the season, 52 full-time teams plan to run all or most of the 36-race schedule. With another half dozen part-time and developmental teams showing up each week, NASCAR is facing the challenge of keeping more than 60 sponsors engaged and enthused about this brand of racing when only 43 of them will compete on any given Sunday.

It is the age-old story of a dog chasing a car – for all his good intentions, what does he do once he catches it? – and NASCAR risks getting run over by its own popularity.

Car counts have been on the rise for the last five years in Nextel Cup. In 2002 and 2003, 1,653 entrants attempted to qualify for the 1,548 slots in 36 points-paying races. That number jumped to 1,716 in 2004, was 1,739 in 2005, and settled into a high of 1,771 last year. That means 223 cars went home before race day last year, leaving well-heeled sponsors sitting in the grandstand without a driver for whom to cheer. With an average Nextel Cup sponsorship running somewhere in the $15-$20 million range, this was more than a minor disappointment.

ADVERTISEMENT


During the last five years, five races have showcased fields of more than 55 cars. The two biggest races in that span were last year's Daytona 500 and the 2004 fall Bass Pro Shops 500 at Atlanta Motor Speedway – both of which boasted 58 entries. The 2005 Daytona 500 had 57 cars take to the track, while the season-ending Ford 400 at Homestead-Miami Speedway drew 56 cars in 2004 and again in 2006.

As impressive as those numbers are, look for even bigger fields in 2007. With a base of 52 full-time teams, some of the marquee events such as the Daytona 500, the Coke 600 and the Brickyard could draw more than 60 cars. If that happens, at least 17 teams will fail to make the show, and with them some of the biggest-named sponsors are going to be very unhappy.

When faced with a similar situation in 2004 after Scott Riggs (with Valvoline) and Scott Wimmer (with Caterpillar) failed to qualify at Atlanta, NASCAR implemented the "Scott Free" rule that guaranteed the top 35 in owner points a slot in the field regardless of how slow they were in time trials. Unless NASCAR is willing to increase the size of the field – especially in high-profile races like those mentioned above – there are going to be even more dissatisfied stockholders in the Fortune 500 companies whose cars are forced to retire early, as typically only eight spots will be up for grabs of those teams not already in the top 35.

Dale Jarrett and Dave Blaney were supposed to be Toyota's guaranteed tickets into the early races, but those assurances may end as early as the completion of week five. NASCAR has already warned Jarrett that if he habitually needs the past champion's provisional to make the races, the sanctioning body may implement a midseason rule limiting the number of times that gift can be used. Blaney, meanwhile, is going to have to get his Camry dialed in very quickly to make certain he is among the top 35 once the 2007 season points start to determine who has a free pass into the races.

The remainder of the Toyota teams and several other new entries campaigning a variety of cars will be forced to fight hard to qualify for the first five races of the season. To make the shows, these teams will have to ignore race trim practice on Fridays and focus on qualifying, which will make them ill-prepared for the race. It is conceivable that each of these drivers could miss one of the first five events. Just as bad, if they struggle during the race itself, they will earn minimal points regardless of how they qualified.

NASCAR reacted decisively when Valvoline and Caterpillar went home early in 2004, but in 2007 they may face the ire of UPS and Burger King, and they may not have any more aces up their sleeve.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Five single largest entry fields in the last five years:

1. 2006 Daytona 500 – 58 cars
1. 2004 Bass Pro Shops 500 – 58 cars
3. 2005 Daytona 500 – 57 cars
4. 2006 Ford 400 – 56 cars
4. 2004 Ford 400 – 56 cars

Five biggest average entry lists during the last five years:

1. Daytona 500 at Daytona – 52.8
2. Ford 400 at Homestead – 51.8
3. Allstate 400 at the Brickyard – 50.8
3. Bass Pro Shops 500 at Atlanta – 50.8
5. Coca-Cola 600 at Lowe's – 50.2
 
Cant see them increasing the field although at a few tracks they may be able to......but some are already overcrowded

It is going to be an interesting year....no a GREAT year!
 
Most tracks wouldn't have enough pit stalls to increase the number of cars in the field.
 
Like iv been saying for a few years. Do like Dirt. Quif. all cars, Then run 25 or so lap heat races. then do the feature. They are course would have to cut the race down to less then 500 miles, but i think it would be worth it. ohh yeah. and drop provs.
 
Yeah the amount of cars in out of hand. There should be X amount of drivers in the series PERIOD.
 
yea, lets try to fit 50 cars in bristol or dover.

the tracks just don't have enough stalls. I can't wait till the triple header weekends, fitting 40 trucks, 45-50 busch cars, and 55 cup cars into tracks like atlanta and texas. Can you say open-air garages?
 
Having too many cars isn't a new problem. This happened about 12-14 years ago. Back then, the lesser funded teams went by the wayside and only a few smaller teams were the ones not getting into races. The same will happen this year. They'll be the occasional Red Bull team not get in, some of that will be inexperienced drivers. But the teams like the #37 and teams like that will be the ones to miss races. They aren't very competitive when they do make a race, so I don't think it will end up being a very big deal once we're 2 months into the season.
 
You don't limit the amount of cars in the series by rule, you do it by performance.

Here's what you do. You STOP immediately, all Cup drivers in Busch. The Busch series becomes a second tier, for real, we'll call it the The Busch NASCAR Series 2nd Division (BSN2D), and the Cup series is The Nextel NASCAR Cup 1st Division (NNC1D). You keep the 1st division limited to 43 starting places, and 50 membership teams overall, the 2nd division accepts all teams, and rookie teams. The 2nd division then gets the teams unable to qualify for the 1st division. Meaning if your team misses a qualifying spot in the first division, you may try again to qualify for the second division race. (Double the attempts for the sponsors.)

At the end of the season the bottom 12 teams from the 1st division drop down to 2, the top 12 teams from the 2nd division move up. (This is in direct contrast to the 12 teams fighting for the Championship in each division, thus we basically have THREE chases going. Those vying for the respective championships, and those trying to stay in the top division.) How cool would that be?

THEN, we eliminate bushwhackers, and the worry for sponsors and the possible loss for NASCAR. Then, we ADD another exciting facet to NASCAR watching the race not only at the top of the leader board, but the bottom as well. Watching teams fight for their lives to stay in the top division the next season.

Of course NASCAR would then have to have all the cars be the same, and modify some other rules, and it would make the races a lot more fun to watch - so, it'll probably never happen.

:)

- k y l e
 
you never know. with the CoT, they might could go to a common cup/busch template. They'd just have to make sure to always do cup quals before busch.
 
So do you think the big sponsers would like to see both of their cars in the same race..over and over? Since nascar is all about money and not one bit about fairness or even racing in general... don't hold your breath.
Betsy:rolleyes:
 
You don't limit the amount of cars in the series by rule, you do it by performance.

Here's what you do. You STOP immediately, all Cup drivers in Busch. The Busch series becomes a second tier, for real, we'll call it the The Busch NASCAR Series 2nd Division (BSN2D), and the Cup series is The Nextel NASCAR Cup 1st Division (NNC1D). You keep the 1st division limited to 43 starting places, and 50 membership teams overall, the 2nd division accepts all teams, and rookie teams. The 2nd division then gets the teams unable to qualify for the 1st division. Meaning if your team misses a qualifying spot in the first division, you may try again to qualify for the second division race. (Double the attempts for the sponsors.)

At the end of the season the bottom 12 teams from the 1st division drop down to 2, the top 12 teams from the 2nd division move up. (This is in direct contrast to the 12 teams fighting for the Championship in each division, thus we basically have THREE chases going. Those vying for the respective championships, and those trying to stay in the top division.) How cool would that be?

THEN, we eliminate bushwhackers, and the worry for sponsors and the possible loss for NASCAR. Then, we ADD another exciting facet to NASCAR watching the race not only at the top of the leader board, but the bottom as well. Watching teams fight for their lives to stay in the top division the next season.

Of course NASCAR would then have to have all the cars be the same, and modify some other rules, and it would make the races a lot more fun to watch - so, it'll probably never happen.

:)

- k y l e

I am not sure that your system would work with out some major tweaks but I like your basic concept.
 
Back
Top Bottom