Forbes: For NASCAR's most valuable teams, trouble at the track

HoneyBadger

I love short track racing (Taylor's Version)
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
94,629
Points
1,033
Location
A short track somewhere
Another economic journal has an article about the dire state of NASCAR racing.

A dozen years ago, few leagues could match the popularity of Nascar, which boasted record-high viewership and was going toe-to-toe with the NFL. But then few leagues suffered worse during the economic crash. Nascar watched as corporate sponsors fled the sport and fans tuned out by the million. Though the race series has bounced back in the years since, it's never returned to those pre-crash highs and some continuing negative trends have taken their toll: Team values are down this year, with the top ten worth an average $137 million, a 7% drop.

Nascar isn't just watching from the sideline, though. The lagging interest in America’s top race series is enough of a concern that this year Nascar will introduce a radically different race format to bring some new excitement - and hopefully some new fans - to the sport. "A lot of it is rooted in research," says Nascar chief marketing officer Steve Phelps of the rules changes. He notes that Nascar is listening to its fans and trying to give them exactly what they want: "They like side-by-side racing, they like restarts, they like this notion of not a contrived break but one that makes sense in the context of people racing hard and winning.”


https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriss...teams-2017-trouble-at-the-track/#19f38ab63132
 
My, we're just all over the financial pages these days, aren't we? I wouldn't have thought this place had WSJ and Forbes readers; did they somehow get mixed up with 'Field & Stream' at the barbershop? :D

I'm beginning to think that Ironhead was wrong, that sometimes it does make a difference if they're cheering or booing, and not just paying attention.
 
These type of articles focus on a period of time when Fox put NASCAR on their broadcast channel. New fans were exposed to stock car racing and interest peaked, the bandwagon fans left and the sky is falling. NASCAR is back on cable and what's left are the core fans that have supported the series all along (and maybe some new ones). I'm curious how today's viewership/ticket sales compare to the 1990s. Constant growth for any business is impossible over time.
 
IMO Nascar's fortunes rest with Monster as I understand there is such a thing as the Monster Lifestyle (I have no clue what that is) that Monster is an "edgy" brand (whatever that means) and that young people like having an experience when they do things (IDK what that is either)

It is good that IDK what that stuff means because I am an old codger and if old people know, like and participate in what youngsters like then it isn't cool any longer. Nascar desperately needs some cool cred from young people as right now it is about as cool as polyester stretch pants and the guys from Lambda Lambda Lambda.

I don't think stages, stage points and other weekly changes that will be implemented will be a hook for people to watch but if Nascar can become
de rigueur then all will be well at least for a while.
 
You're saying we're not cool?

revenge-of-the-nerds-tri-lam-sweaters.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom