If This Is True, What Is NASCAR Thinking?

kat2220

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Messages
16,886
Points
0
Location
Marietta, GA
Message to NASCAR: Stay out of gray matters
By Lee Spencer


Perhaps the hardest thing for an athlete to hear is: "Your services are no longer needed," or some variation on that theme.

Every time a jock reaches the next rung on the ladder, the competition heightens, and the chances of making the team are slimmer. By the time he makes it to the majors, positions are few, and there's a lot more work involved just to maintain a spot on the team -- especially as the aging process takes hold.

Partly because of proper training and diet, major league sports are witnessing more than just a touch of gray these days -- Jerry Rice, 41, is still catching passes, and Roger Clemens, 41, and Randy Johnson, 40, are still throwing pitches -- and that's the way it has always been in NASCAR. If a driver avoids serious injury, he easily could race until he is 50 or beyond. Richard Petty was 42 when he won his seventh and last championship in 1979, and he raced 13 seasons beyond that. The late Dale Earnhardt was 43 in 1994 when he won his seventh title. Bobby Allison won his only title just short of his 46th birthday.

As long as the sponsors and team owners were satisfied with the driver's performance, he could race as long as he wanted.

But that's about to change. And the pressure to kick the aging cans of veteran drivers isn't coming so much from the owners or sponsors. It's coming from NASCAR.

"NASCAR has suggested to many, many people that some drivers cut back to partial schedules," says Rusty Wallace, 47. "That might happen one of these days."

And that came from NASCAR?

"Yes," Wallace says. "One main NASCAR official suggested, 'Why don't you run a partial schedule? There's nothing wrong with a partial schedule.' "

OK. Although there have been 100 races since he last won, at California in 2001, what right does anyone in Daytona have to tell Wallace, the 1989 champion, when it's time to hang up his helmet?

But while NASCAR is ushering stars toward retirement, it's putting out desperate help-wanted calls to washed-up veterans to fill fields. Funny, but I must have missed the Joe Ruttman and Kirk Shelmerdine souvenir rigs on the way to the Rock. Perhaps that's where Ruttman's pit crew was two Sundays ago, selling T-shirts.
If NASCAR has to scramble to get 43 cars for a race, fans would rather watch proven professionals, such as Johnny Benson and Jimmy Spencer, than field fillers who are forced off the track because they don't have a pit crew (Ruttman) or cars that can reach the minimum speed (Shelmerdine).

Plenty of drivers raced past the point of contending for wins, including Petty and Darrell Waltrip. But as long as the fans supported the drivers' efforts and they didn't endanger other drivers, that was all that mattered.

"The sport dictates the level of competition," says Robbie Loomis, who was crew chief for Petty's No. 43 car the final two seasons of his career. "If someone can catch the ball better and run faster than Deion Sanders, he's going to be replaced. That's just sports and the nature of the world that the younger ones coming up will be stronger.

"But when I worked for Richard, NASCAR and the media were very gracious to The King those last years. No matter where we went or what we did, he was respected for who he was and what he had accomplished. I think some of that respect has been lost along the way."

That's analogous to Arnold Palmer's gradual departure from competitive golf. As he stepped back from playing various events, the PGA Tour had no reservations when event organizers gave the cold shoulder to other golfers from Palmer's generation. Now NASCAR is following suit.

A lot of respect has been lost along the way for the stars who built this sport. NASCAR has forgotten the core fans who cheered for Ricky Rudd or Bill Elliott before Brian Vickers and Johnny Sauter were born. There would not have been interest from NBC or FOX to broadcast the races if veterans such as Wallace hadn't sacrificed their time and risked their lives to make NASCAR what it is today.

But if Earnhardt were still alive, I doubt anyone in Daytona would have the audacity to suggest he watch races from the pits.

Lee Spencer covers NASCAR for Sporting News. Email her at [email protected].
 
I just read that on my home board and was about to post it here...makes me sick...I can't image a race without the veterans...will be a very sad day!!! :(
 
If in fact this is true, and even if it isn't, it really peeves me! Where does Nascar come off telling drivers when they should 'cut back to a partial' schedule. Since when did they pay those drivers' salaries??? I thought that was the team owners that did that? They need to keep their noses out of places that it doesn't belong, and while they are at it, quit begging "old has-beens" to bring their cars to race. So what if it isn't a full 43 car field!!! Cars that have no pit crews and ones that can't keep above the minimum speed limit have absolutely NO business being at the race.

Just my .02 worth. You opinion and mileage may vary.
 
I suppose NASCAR wants us to have a NEW favorite driver every 4-5 years what a crock. The problem is racing is so popular and EVERYONE wants to race in the CUP series NASCAR is trying to make room for all of the drivers who only race 1 season in the Bush series and think they can run with the big dogs, which some can, but a lot can't.
 
Calm down folks... two words for you...

LEE SPENCER (you can insert you explecitive deleted in bewteeen if you wish.)

Same reported that reported that it was a done deal for Kyle Petty to retire as soon as Shane Hmeil was reinstated.

It's shame that The Sporting News would allow such garbage to be published.
 
This will guarantee that Rusty will never win another race; i.e., tech inspections, pit lane speed violations...etc
 
That is enough to tick me off. But then again this is NASCAR we are talking about here. If this is true, I can't imagine a guy like Rusty Wallace (an egomaniac if I ever saw one) being told that he should cut down to a limited schedule. :angry:
 
Originally posted by redrock@Mar 2 2004, 08:41 PM
This will guarantee that Rusty will never win another race; i.e., tech inspections, pit lane speed violations...etc
You have a very good point. But NASCAR also knows it is good for ratings when someone like Rusty wins the occasional race. :unsure:
 
I do not know who Lee Spencer is and from the crap she wrote, she is definitely NOT a reporter nor is she any good in her editorial. Perhaps the Inquirer might be a better fit for Ms. Spencer.

It seems Ms. Spencer is more interested in stirring emotions than in good reporting.

Ms. Spencer leaves out one important portion in the Wallace interview,that being no mention of who introduced or why the topic of a partial schedule even came to the surface in the first place. Things do not happen this way. If NASCAR were to be the one who brought the subject up, the topic would be accompanied with a reason to prevent any misunderstandings.
Any reporter interested in good journalism, would have asked this question and used the information since it is the basis of her story.

Think for a moment about NASCAR "suggesting" current day older drivers go to a limited schedule and before jumping to conclusions, ask yourself, why??
For what purpose? To bring in a younger, untested in the NEXTEL NASCAR Series driver ? To sell more souveniers ?? To bring in a larger crowd??
I don't think so.

As for her accuracy, NASCAR has repeatedly and vehemently denied soliciting and using "field fillers". The policy has been to permit any entry a spot in the field after passing inspection and qualifying. NASCAR says there is no mandatory number of cars to start a race therefore making "field fillers" unecessary.

When changes are made to the entries of any NEXTEL NASCAR Series race, it will be to eliminate the Finch and Shelmerdine type of starter for reasons previously mentioned in other posts.

As John Stossel says on the television program he hosts with Barbara Walters, "GIVE ME A BREAK"!!!!!!! GEESH !!!!!! (Stossel doesn't add that part however)
 
My favorite drivers are Ken Schrader and Brian Vickers. Schrader being #1. No matter how much I like Brian, I wouldn't want him or anyone else like him to push guys like Schrader out of the sport. The veterans are one of the reasons guys like Brian are in Nascar. They were their heroes growing up, and I don't think any one of them would want to be responsible for slowly getting rid of veterans.
 
The problem and the solution are all right there.

Too many older drivers, more and more tracks wanting races, alot of fans who wish to see the vets still racing, alot of fans who wish to see the younger guys driving the top division. Do I even need to say it?

It's time for an old timers league.
 
I don't really like the idea of getting rid of all the older drivers ... but if that's what they want thats hwat they get
 
Originally posted by kat2220@Mar 2 2004, 05:48 PM
Great observations Whizzer!
That's what I was going to say, Kat!! :D I guess no one else agrees though!!

I've read a few thing by Lee Spencer...........she leaves a lot to be desired on her accuracy and her assessment of the "facts" she digs up. But, it's so much more fun to scream conspiracy and beat up on NASCAR. :D


Great post Whizzer........well thought out and well put. :cheers:
 
Back
Top Bottom