Jeff Gluck summarized the race well

[Magnethead]

http://www.sbnation.com/2010/6/14/1517353/michigan-nascar-2010-debris-denny-hamlin

To sum it up: The race started, the Red Bull cars wrecked, Denny Hamlin had the lead, Denny Hamlin won.

Had I forgotten something? Typically after a NASCAR race the last couple years, there's some sort of water cooler topic to carry through to the next week.

.....

Because of those rules that inject some action into the show, it seems something always happens. There's always something to talk about.

Hell, even POCONO gave us some interesting material.

 

[TexasRaceLady]

The race was so normal, it was abnormal.

This is the sentence that tickled my fancy.

 

[mike honcho]

There is 2 things I can think of to talk about.Will Mears still be in the 83 in 2 weeks and the trucks can put on a great show at Mich.Why not the cars??

 

[Spike]

I still say they should of let someone young like Bayne take over the #83. He would of done just as good or better than Mears and could of probably got RBRT a ROY awaard even with the late start.

 

[GREAT AMERICAN RACE FAN]

I can't say I don't agree with Jeff Gluck. I have been down on NASCAR for "phantom debris cautions" to bunch up the pack. But it has provided some really good finishes to the races. Also some hurt feelings, bent up race cars and a few surprise winners(Ryan Newman at Phoenix and Harvick at 'dega).

 

[Tennessee Racing]

There aren't many races where nothing at all happens. Other than Mears NOTHING happened at ALL.