Junior blasts NASCAR

TexasRaceLady

Plank Owner
Contributor
Joined
Sep 18, 2001
Messages
34,912
Points
1,033
Location
Deep in the heart of Texas
Say what you want about his driving, but the young man has a head on his shoulders. He makes several valid points in this article.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nascar/news?slug=jb-junior103108&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

FORT WORTH, Texas – Dale Earnhardt Jr. went from race car driver to philosopher Friday at Texas Motor Speedway. And in the process, stock car racing's favorite son likely ruffled quite a few feathers in NASCAR's front office.

In one of his most poignant interviews ever, Earnhardt confirmed what a lot of people – most notably disenchanted or former NASCAR fans – have been thinking for a long time.

Namely, NASCAR has grown too big, the season is too long and the watered-down result, particularly the Chase for the Sprint Cup, is hurting the sport dramatically, with potentially even more damage to come as the world remains in economic crisis.

With rumors swirling that current Sprint Cup, Nationwide and Craftsman Truck Series teams will lay off close to 1,000 employees at season's end, as well as reports that several teams across the sport's top three series are likely to close their doors or merge with others, this is one of the most challenging times NASCAR has ever faced

In a year that the sanctioning body was supposed to get back to its roots, it may be time for NASCAR to take an even longer, harder look at itself, Earnhardt said.

Foremost in his mind: the length of the season.

"We have saturated the market with race after race after race," Earnhardt said. "The NFL, they do such a great job. I hate to keep comparing to them and using them as examples, but they do the best job.

"They give you just enough to keep you wanting more. The season ends before you want it to. You get just enough to get excited and then it's all over and there's such a long wait. The model works."

With expansion both geographically and event-wise, the bloated NASCAR schedule has, in effect, become a victim of its own success.

"We have basically a very similar reaction that baseball, hockey, a lot of other sports do that have long enduring seasons," Earnhardt said. "There's lulls and inactivity between the fan and the sport itself at times. There's no way to fix that."

But perhaps Earnhardt's most pointed comment was a swipe at what could be construed as greed and excess, not only by the sanctioning body, but drivers, team owners and practically everyone associated with the sport.

"We're driven by the ability to go make another dollar and make more money and there's no way we would ever trim it down," Earnhardt said with a shrug. "When we were a 28-race schedule, the sport was giving you just enough to get really get excited about the next season.

"When we were racing at 12 o'clock, people were racing home from church to get to see the start of the race. We've just made it too easy and too much. We sort of lost a lot of the substance that we really had before and the character of the sport I think has waned a little bit, but its part of the times, too."

Even though it would mean a significant drop in revenue, Earnhardt would love to see NASCAR scale back. But he isn't holding his breath it'll happen any time soon.

"I don't think [NASCAR's current problems are] all our fault," he said. "I think it has a lot to do with a lot of other things going on, like the temperature of the world out there and the economy.

"I think the model that the NFL has is the perfect one and I feel like that's really our best bet for the most amount of success and to maintain it I think also that's the best way."

Unfortunately, Earnhardt said, NASCAR has already passed the point of no return.

"No way we would ever trim the schedule back," he said. "There's no way we would change what we really already have here."

Junior was equally vociferous in his thoughts on the Chase for the Sprint Cup format and how it has played out over its five-year existence, particularly this season.

Since NASCAR chairman Brian France introduced the Chase to the sport in 2004, it's gone through several so-called "tweaks," including expanding the qualifying field and rewarding drivers with bonus points for wins, among other things.

As much as fans are increasingly clamoring for even more significant change in the Chase format – if not scrapping it outright – now is the time for patience, not pestilence, Earnhardt said.

"I think it's not a good idea to go making a bunch of changes, especially with the Chase," Earnhardt said. "How do we understand what to change and how to make it better if we can't watch it and look at it for seven years or eight years and see how it's working and really get a good look at how it is working and not working?

"How can we really know what to change and make the right change? We shouldn't keep changing and changing until we stumble on the right spot and the right options and the right ways to have things."

More changes could further alienate more fans, something NASCAR can ill afford in a time when so many seats at races are going unfilled; when media outlets are scaling back – if not totally eliminating – coverage of the sport; and opportunities for up-and-coming drivers are drying up quicker than an ice-cream cone in the desert.

"It is kind of foolish to want to make changes," Earnhardt said. "This is kind of how we got in this spot in the first place. It's just going to snowball into more and more corruption and disagreement if we continue to change and change and change just because a guy has such a great year.

"I think the playoff atmosphere is better and I do enjoy it. We need to really kind of watch it happen for a while before we know what kind of change to make."

Given the economy, NASCAR might not have to change things. The problem may very well take care of itself by default, albeit it might be a long process, Earnhardt said.

"I think they should really remain the same for a while so we can get a good [look]," he said. "Especially with the turbulence with the economy right now, we all need to be really kind of watching and looking in different areas to make sure things are working right.

"We've got to make sure we're doing all the right things to keep the sport healthy and get through the tough times that we're going to have in the next year. I think we leave the things as they are."

Earnhardt Jr. may not be the eldest statesman in the NASCAR garage, but when he speaks, fans listen. The question is, will NASCAR?


Veteran motorsports writer Jerry Bonkowski is Yahoo! Sports' NASCAR columnist. Send Jerry a question or comment for potential use in a future column or webcast.
 
For a long time now I've been saying that NASCAR should race only every other weekend and only once per track with the possible exception being Daytona.

Earnhardt is exactly right in that the problem is money and how people want to make more of it. That's not bad in itself, but there comes a time when the want to make more money can actually hurt future earnings. Maybe their idea is get what you can before it falls. With TV ratings steadily heading south, maybe the fall has started, but when you look at the plans NASCAR has and who wants another date and who wants a date, nobody seems to notice.
 
I agree with the June Bug. 28 races is enough.

One date everywhere except Daytona.

Gives you the ability to expand as well.



Oh, and lower the ticket prices.:mad:
 
Greed, the way of the world. Trust me, it's not going away any time soon.

We've all been talking of this greed, but what is greed? The thing with NASCAR, and Junior even said this, is that many people are looking to make more money, from the owners to the drivers, on down to the gas men over the wall. There comes a line when some people will call asking for more money greed, while it is only natural to want more. If Greed is the way of the world, then it is the way with everything and everybody.
 
Kudos to Jr. I am a big fan of his along with Gordon and Bobby Labonte. I am liking Jr more and more as time goes on.

greed
Pronunciation: \ˈgrēd\

: a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (as money) than is needed
 
After considering Junior's words about the length of the season ---- maybe it's not the number of races, but the huge amount of time spent on non-racing "stuff" that makes the season seem to last forever.
 
After considering Junior's words about the length of the season ---- maybe it's not the number of races, but the huge amount of time spent on non-racing "stuff" that makes the season seem to last forever.
IE testing.

But the season itself could be shorter. Think about it- 52 weeks is a year, and the season is 36 weeks. Only 18 weeks split, from november to february.

If they took away things like pocono's second date, fontana's second date, NHIS's second date, pheonix's second date, and maybe a few [many] others, and insert places like kentucky and maybe a third road course, it would work out.
 
If you start taking away dates how then do you handle the law suits that would follow? And you know they would. I think the bed has been made and you'll have to wait for some tracks to go belly up from their own greed before you'll see the number change.
 
Following Sr's death it disappointed me that no one stepped up to take his place as spokeman for the drivers. Rusty,DJ, Ricky Rudd, Jeff Gordon etc were silent. Sr wasn't one to hold back his opinion. Who else took his position back after a official blew a pit road call? The "missing lug nut" incident.

With his popularity maybe Jr can continue to be a thorn in Na$cars side, telling it like it is.

I don't think its the racing/testing so much as it is sponsor commitments who want their pound of flesh for the $$$ they put up. The commercials and driver appearances etc.

ISC, Na$car, owns 12 tracks and most have multiple racing dates. If anything they'll try to aquire more. You'd have better luck taking a pork chop away from a starving pit bull than get a ISC track to give up a Na$car race date.
 
I agree, the season is too long. It goes from February to November. Way too long.

And the opposite being IndyCar. Its too short. I want at least 20 races and the best I get next year is 18.:(
 
Following Sr's death it disappointed me that no one stepped up to take his place as spokeman for the drivers. Rusty,DJ, Ricky Rudd, Jeff Gordon etc were silent. Sr wasn't one to hold back his opinion. Who else took his position back after a official blew a pit road call? The "missing lug nut" incident.

With his popularity maybe Jr can continue to be a thorn in Na$cars side, telling it like it is.

I don't think its the racing/testing so much as it is sponsor commitments who want their pound of flesh for the $$$ they put up. The commercials and driver appearances etc.

ISC, Na$car, owns 12 tracks and most have multiple racing dates. If anything they'll try to aquire more. You'd have better luck taking a pork chop away from a starving pit bull than get a ISC track to give up a Na$car race date.
What about Smoke?



Rusty's the biggest NASCAR brownnoser around.

"NASCAR's always consistent man" :XXROFL::XXROFL::XXROFL::XXROFL:
 
Maybe they can change the venues of the last 10 races every year. that might help
 
Cheaper ticket prices from seating all the way down to pit road passes, garage passes where offered, and all the other "extras," could be scaled back and I think they'd get more people who could afford to go and probably not lose all that much money. For a sport that's supposed to be for the "blue collar worker" they sure charge white collar prices. When you add in the cost of accomodations, gas and food, it amounts to so much you could take a nice vacation instead. Camping prices are ridiculous at some tracks and they don't offer much as far as amenities go - Portable showers, not a whole lot of restrooms, no electric, etc. It's cheaper to camp at a State Park and get a lot more for your money. Forget it if you have an RV - you could take a cruise once you add up all it costs to take one of those and the charges for all the rest.
 
Andy you asked about Stewart. Maybe but he goes about it the wrong way, he gets "hot under the collar".
As I said I was disappointed the guys that raced with Sr, Rusty, DJ, Ricky Rudd and even Jeff who was a 2 or 3 time champ when Sr died didn't step up to the plate. They lost, IMHO, their one and only spokesman that Na$car actually listened too.
 
Following Sr's death it disappointed me that no one stepped up to take his place as spokeman for the drivers. Rusty,DJ, Ricky Rudd, Jeff Gordon etc were silent. Sr wasn't one to hold back his opinion. Who else took his position back after a official blew a pit road call? The "missing lug nut" incident.


If I remember right Jeff Gordon was the "Spokesman" for the drivers.....We had talked about this last season, and all the Gordon fans said this was great and he's the perfect person for this role....hummmmm
 
Cheaper ticket prices from seating all the way down to pit road passes, garage passes where offered, and all the other "extras," could be scaled back and I think they'd get more people who could afford to go and probably not lose all that much money. For a sport that's supposed to be for the "blue collar worker" they sure charge white collar prices. When you add in the cost of accomodations, gas and food, it amounts to so much you could take a nice vacation instead. Camping prices are ridiculous at some tracks and they don't offer much as far as amenities go - Portable showers, not a whole lot of restrooms, no electric, etc. It's cheaper to camp at a State Park and get a lot more for your money. Forget it if you have an RV - you could take a cruise once you add up all it costs to take one of those and the charges for all the rest.
Yorkie, I know you've been to a race lately, but did you pay attention to the number of people in the infield and garage areas? Watching the races on TV really doesn't show how much activity that really goes on behind pit wall. I was fortunate enough to be able to experience all of this at the last Charlotte race and what a surprise. I almost got run over by several cars and it wasn't that I wasn't paying attention, it was because it was so crowded. Yes, the cost of a ticket is outrageous, but they are still packing them in. There might be some empty seats, but there are still an awful lot of people there spending big bucks.
 
Marketing 101. Pricing decisions.

High prices but less sales. Indication of an elite product.
Lower prices and more sales. Indication of a common product.

I thought nascar was trying to market itself to the common man. Pricing says different.
 
Back
Top Bottom