Marlin, Nemecheck Sue Ginn

kat2220

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 11, 2002
Messages
16,886
Points
0
Location
Marietta, GA
Marlin, Nemechek file lawsuit against Ginn Racing, DEI
SCENEDAILY - BY BOB POCKRASS - ASSOCIATE EDITOR


Sterling Marlin and Joe Nemechek have sued Ginn Racing and Dale Earnhardt Inc. for alleged breaches of their contracts, which included a base salary of $1.2 million apiece.

The separate suits, filed Sept. 7 in Cabarrus County, N.C., do not specify how much they have been paid or what they exactly are owed.

Also suing Ginn and DEI are crew chiefs Richard "Slugger" Labbe and Peter Sospenzo.

Ginn and DEI merged prior to the Indianapolis race in July, and Marlin and Nemechek found themselves without a place in the organization. The points of the No. 14 of Marlin ended up moving to the No. 15 of DEI with Paul Menard as the driver, while the No. 13 Nemechek team was eliminated.

"Demand for payment has been made... but [Ginn and DEI] have failed and/or refused to pay all or any part," the complaints state.

J. Merritt White, an attorney representing the former Ginn employees, and a DEI publicist did not return a phone message left Sept. 10 for comment.

The contracts of both drivers and both crew chiefs were filed as part of the complaints and give an insight to what the current rate is for drivers.

Both drivers joined the organization when it was MB2 Motorsports. Marlin began in 2006 with a base salary of $1.1 million, and that increased to $1.2 million for 2007. Nemechek started with MB2 in 2004 and received $900,000 for 2004, $1 million for 2005, $1.1 million for 2006 and $1.2 million for 2007.

Both drivers got to keep 45 percent of their race winnings (Nemechek, who was 27th in points in 2006, had $4,099,914 million total in race winnings last year, while Marlin, 34th in points, had $3,248,034 million) and 33 percent of souvenir sales. Their bonus schedules were $50,000 per win, $25,000 for a top-five, $10,000 for a top-10 and $5,000 per pole. Winning a Cup title was worth a $500,000 bonus, while second through fifth in the final standings were worth $250,000; sixth through 10th were $150,000; 11th through 15th were $100,000 and 16th through 20th were $50,000.

Each received a $500 per race travel allowance, a seat on the team plane and a hotel room for each race. They also got a personal car. They agreed to 50 hours of personal appearances for a sponsor plus two days for commercials or media events as well as unlimited track hospitality visits not to exceed 30 minutes in length.

They were both responsible for their own insurance. There is a morals clause in each contract stating they "shall not associate with gamblers or other notorious characters; shall not use illegal drugs; and shall not consume alcoholic beverages except in moderation but in no event within eight hours prior to driving in a race or practice."

As far as the crew chiefs, Labbe, hired as the crew chief for Marlin in August 2006, and Sospenzo, hired as crew chief for Nemechek in October 2006, were earning $450,000 annual salaries. Labbe was guaranteed another $50,000 if his bonus money didn't reach that amount, while Sospenzo was guaranteed $25,000. Their bonuses were $20,000 for a win, $10,000 for second-fifth, $5,000 for sixth-10th, $2,500 for 11th-15th and $1,000 for a pole.

A season championship was worth $100,000; second-fifth ($75,000) and sixth-10th were $50,000 for Labbe and sixth-12th were $50,000 for Sospenzo.

They also got a personal vehicle as well as reimbursement for motor home expenses. They agreed to make 10 away-from-the-track appearances. They also signed confidentiality agreements related to technical data and car setups. They also agreed that if they left the company, they would not attempt to hire any crewmembers for a year.
 
One thing that I find interesting about this is that they're going to finally give us a real look at how Nascar drivers are paid.

It is something that the owners and drivers alike have been pretty good about keeping in the dark. Yes, from time to time we'll hear something about how much so-and-so makes- but to really get a look at these contracts will be revealing.

I'm already surprised that Joe and Sterling's base salaries were as high as they were. We've heard that pay has been steadily increasing but for guys well to middle or lower middle of the pack to be making a 7 figure base is interesting.
 
Yes, this story will be very interesting. And if it is truely a breach of contract, I hope they win this battle.
 
One thing that I find interesting about this is that they're going to finally give us a real look at how Nascar drivers are paid.

It is something that the owners and drivers alike have been pretty good about keeping in the dark. Yes, from time to time we'll hear something about how much so-and-so makes- but to really get a look at these contracts will be revealing.

I'm already surprised that Joe and Sterling's base salaries were as high as they were. We've heard that pay has been steadily increasing but for guys well to middle or lower middle of the pack to be making a 7 figure base is interesting.

Yeah, they have worked together to keep these contracts a secret. It was only a matter of time before someone spilled the beans.
 
One thing that I find interesting about this is that they're going to finally give us a real look at how Nascar drivers are paid.

It is something that the owners and drivers alike have been pretty good about keeping in the dark. Yes, from time to time we'll hear something about how much so-and-so makes- but to really get a look at these contracts will be revealing.

I'm already surprised that Joe and Sterling's base salaries were as high as they were. We've heard that pay has been steadily increasing but for guys well to middle or lower middle of the pack to be making a 7 figure base is interesting.


I'm also surprised, i'd a thought these guys were making low 6 figure salaries along with whatever percent of winnings they both get. I say DEI should just go ahead & give'em there 1.2 Mil a piece plus another 400K each and call it a day. It's not like they can't afford it.
 
Their contract was with Bobby Ginn. I don't see why DEI would be involved in this. I also head Bobby hadn't paid the crew guys since March. DEI says that is with Ginn not them because it was before there time.
 
Their contract was with Bobby Ginn. I don't see why DEI would be involved in this. I also head Bobby hadn't paid the crew guys since March. DEI says that is with Ginn not them because it was before there time.

i think DEI is wrong.....when DEI bought Ginn or merged with them..whichever...they would also assume all contracts that are in place and would be responsible for them.
 
From Jayski...

More on the Marlin-Nemechek-Ginn Lawsuit: Bobby Ginn said Tuesday he's surprised by a lawsuit that claims he hasn't honored the contracts for Sterling Marlin, Joe Nemechek and two crew chiefs. All four lost their jobs when Ginn Racing merged with Dale Earnhardt Inc. in late July. The four filed separate lawsuits against both teams last week in Cabarrus County, claiming they are owed their salaries. The suits don't specify what the parties are seeking, but claim they have demanded payment, and the teams have either failed or refused to comply. "Sterling and Joe's contracts ran through the end of the year, and I have paid them through August -- all of their winnings and salary, per the contract," Ginn said. "And I intend to pay through the end of the year. I always have." Ginn said that crew chiefs Richard "Slugger" Labbe and Peter Sospenzo were given severance packages when they were let go, and said he's honored it and payments are up to date. "This totally surprised me, and it looks to me like they are trying to ask for something over and above and they are just not entitled to," Ginn said. Marlin did not return a telephone message Tuesday, while Nemechek and the crew chiefs could not be reached. DEI, also named in the suit, said it was never a party to the contracts in question and the obligation to honor the agreements falls on Ginn.(AP/ESPN.com), see past news on this and more on the lawsuit, see my Lawsuit News page.(9-12-2007)
 
i think DEI is wrong.....when DEI bought Ginn or merged with them..whichever...they would also assume all contracts that are in place and would be responsible for them.

If they assumed the contracts, they didn't necessarily assume any debts owed by Ginn. It depends on what the deal said when DEI bought Ginn. In most cases, the buyer does not assume any debts or losses from the seller. It's up to the seller to settle his debts with money off the sale or by some other means.

When I worked at a local dirt track for 5 years, the first owners I worked for ran into money problems and started bouncing checks. After he sold the track, a driver came to the new owner asking for his money from a bad check. The new owner told him he didn't assume any of the debts and would need to collect it off the former owner.
 
I can't believe they agreed to an alcohol in moderation clause :eek:
 
Back
Top Bottom