NASCAR considering multiyear track contracts

FLRacingFan

Team Owner
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
40,239
Points
1,033
Location
Florida
After a longtime policy of one-year engagements, NASCAR is poised to enter long-term relationships with its racetracks.

There have been multiple meetings after the 2014 season to discuss the concept of multiyear sanctioning agreements that effectively would set much of the Sprint Cup schedule beyond the current season for the first time.

NASCAR traditionally has signed annual deals with every track, pushing the yearly release of the schedule to late summer or early fall.

"I think it's fair to say we have had discussions with the tracks about multiyear agreements," NASCAR executive vice president and chief racing development officer Steve O'Donnell told USA TODAY Sports. "We're not there yet. If we can put something together where it's helpful for fans to know, our goal is to get the schedule out as early as we can. That helps fans making plans for going to tracks. Some fans travel a long way. If we can make that better through a multiyear (deal), that is something we're considering."

A multiyear deal would offer tracks the ability to sell season ticket packages and sponsorships with more flexibility and security.

It also would allow a better savings opportunity for fans who travel long distances for races and sometimes face intractable situations in adapting to major changes.

When the 2015 schedule was released last August, Atlanta Motor Speedway was swapped to a March 1 race in 2015 after six consecutive seasons of playing host to a Labor Day weekend event – giving the track and its fans only a six-month turnaround from the 2014 race.

"If you knew the Atlanta date two years from now, and you're a big fan of going to Atlanta, you make the plan to head there," O'Donnell said. "Maybe you look at California one year. It just gives you more time to plan and go to tracks that may not be as close to you."



http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2015/01/20/nascar-sprint-cup-schedule-track-contracts/22053571/
 
Lesa France Kennedy and Bruton Smith likes this very much.
Because it is all about the fans, and they knows what is best for the little folks.
 
:bleh:

Maybe we can bring an anti-trust suit against SMI and ISC? Break up the two big corporations and allow a more variety of tracks in the three top tier racing series of NASCAR?
 
:bleh:

Maybe we can bring an anti-trust suit against SMI and ISC? Break up the two big corporations and allow a more variety of tracks in the three top tier racing series of NASCAR?

Probably why there are no races near NYC or other so called desired markets.
People aren't going to buisness with corporate swine or leeches.
 
:bleh:

Maybe we can bring an anti-trust suit against SMI and ISC? Break up the two big corporations and allow a more variety of tracks in the three top tier racing series of NASCAR?
I don't know how they've gotten away with it for so long. Unless you were a staple of the series long before the track wars started (Dover and Pocono) or are the most famous track in the country (Indy) you top out at the Xfinity level at best, and more often the Truck Series. Unless you get bought out you have no hope of hosting a Cup race. Just look at how no one had any real hope for Iowa until NASCAR bought it. Road Atlanta got bought by NASCAR as part of the Panoz purchase a few years ago and almost instantly got a K&N Pro East race.
 
I don't know how they've gotten away with it for so long. Unless you were a staple of the series long before the track wars started (Dover and Pocono) or are the most famous track in the country (Indy) you top out at the Xfinity level at best, and more often the Truck Series. Unless you get bought out you have no hope of hosting a Cup race. Just look at how no one had any real hope for Iowa until NASCAR bought it. Road Atlanta got bought by NASCAR as part of the Panoz purchase a few years ago and almost instantly got a K&N Pro East race.

I kind of wish the cities own these tracks like they own NFL stadiums and during the off-season, NASCAR opens up a bidding war for all the slots (save for the historical races like the Daytona 500 or the Southern 500) for that season.
 
I like the idea. Sometimes we have trouble getting into some of our favorite places to camp near the track because we don't know the date of the event. When we don't stay at the track for the event, we stay at either state or federal campgrounds. People are able to make reservations for state parks a year in advance, federal parks six months in advance. Many times the best spots are taken because of the delay in the schedule announcement.
 
I like the idea. Sometimes we have trouble getting into some of our favorite places to camp near the track because we don't know the date of the event. When we don't stay at the track for the event, we stay at either state or federal campgrounds. People are able to make reservations for state parks a year in advance, federal parks six months in advance. Many times the best spots are taken because of the delay in the schedule announcement.
Yep. I barely got reservations for the campgrounds we're staying at for the Pocono and Michigan races. I started planning for those in November.
 
I kind of wish the cities own these tracks like they own NFL stadiums and during the off-season, NASCAR opens up a bidding war for all the slots (save for the historical races like the Daytona 500 or the Southern 500) for that season.

Don't you think the tax payers have enough problems without supporting Nascar?
 
What do you expect them to do?

They have HUGE Capital investments in fixed infrastructures located in key market areas all over the country. There is also the infrastructure close or fairly close to most race tracks that cater to race fans and were built to accommodate the ingress and presence of race fans.

The last thing you want is a municipality and all the government politics involved in this sport, we are doing fine thank you, without any government intervention. All the track owners have to deal with the politicians all the time anyway just to function as a free enterprise business.

Times being as they are we are all looking for stability in the future. This idea makes sense to me. You can not just **** a race track into being.

But then again, I am no politician or billionaire, I am but just a simple business man that is a NASCAR Race Fan and am very glad we have so many different tracks in different parts of the country to attend when I can and enjoy weekly during the season.
 
I kind of wish the cities own these tracks like they own NFL stadiums and during the off-season, NASCAR opens up a bidding war for all the slots (save for the historical races like the Daytona 500 or the Southern 500) for that season.
As a taxpayer, I am violently opposed to having my money spent on sports facilities. Cities shouldn't own tracks like stadiums; stadiums should be able to pull their own weight like tracks. If tracks can turn profits with a couple of races a year, stadiums can certainly do so with 10 weekends; more for basketball and baseball.
 
As a taxpayer, I am violently opposed to having my money spent on sports facilities. Cities shouldn't own tracks like stadiums; stadiums should be able to pull their own weight like tracks. If tracks can turn profits with a couple of races a year, stadiums can certainly do so with 10 weekends; more for basketball and baseball.

Amen brother!
 
Back
Top Bottom