NASCAR Wants COT in Full Schedule by '08

tkj24

Team Owner
Joined
Oct 5, 2001
Messages
7,877
Points
398
Location
Tennessee
NASCAR Wants COT in Full Schedule by '08
Wednesday, February 28, 2007 6:22 PM EST
The Associated Press
By JENNA FRYER AP Auto Racing Writer

BRISTOL, Tenn. (AP) — NASCAR wants to speed up implementation of its Car of Tomorrow to have it in use full-time by 2008, officials said Wednesday.

The COT will debut March 25 at Bristol Motor Speedway, the first of 16 races this season for the car designed to improve racing, bolster safety and cut team costs. The car was scheduled to run 26 races in 2008, and the full Nextel Cup schedule in 2009.

But Nextel Cup director John Darby said NASCAR is leaning toward putting the COT in full use next season.

"Whether we would expand the COT schedule for 2007 is probably not likely. But could we be all in for 2008? I think that is very possible," Darby said.

The announcement came on the first of NASCAR's two-day COT test at Bristol, where 50 teams were on hand to get a feel for the new car. But unlike past test sessions that were riddled with complaints and criticisms, drivers and crew chiefs seemed resigned to the car and focused only on fine tuning it for competition.

"From a driver's perspective, once you get in the car it's just a car," Jeff Burton said. "In my world, it's no longer about the Car of Tomorrow. It's just about a car, trying to do it better than everybody else. The Car of Tomorrow is here today."

That's the attitude NASCAR is hoping will lead to a push from car owners to implement the car faster. Although the COT is expected to ultimately cut productions costs, teams are currently spending through the roof to produce a fleet of stock cars while also developing the COT.

"It's a pain in the butt for the teams to run two parallel programs with two different race cars," Darby said. "It's a pain for us to manipulate and work and apply two different rule books, two different inspection procedures.

"A lot of what's happening is it's settling in to all the competitors that this is the future, this is the car. Why are we going to wait three years? I don't think we will."

But four-time series champion Jeff Gordon warned that it's too soon to declare the COT ready to run a 36-race schedule next season.

"I think it's too early to really commit to that. I understand it from a financial standpoint ... but I think until we get through some races, I really think there are some changes that might need to happen," Gordon said. "That's why we are running it this year, so we can get the car out there, put in race conditions and go through the inspection process, qualifying, race prep — everything that it's going to take and really evaluate this car fully."

The COT is a six-year project that started under Gary Nelson, NASCAR's former vice president of research and development, when the sanctioning body was reeling from the 2001 death of Dale Earnhardt. Under fire because of its antiquated safety system, NASCAR took several steps to update its equipment, including the development of the COT.

The design changes in the care are not subtle. It's 4 inches wider and 2 inches taller than NASCAR's current race cars. The roll cage has shifted 3 inches to the rear, and the driver's seat 4 inches to the right.

An energy-absorbing material between the roll cage and the car's skin gives drivers a new layer of protection. The exhaust system runs through the body, diverting heat away from the driver and letting it out on the right side. The drive shaft is covered by a tunnel under the floorboard to keep it from tearing through the car if it should explode.

The windshield is more upright, designed to increase the amount of drag and slow the cars. The front bumper is 3 inches higher and thicker, boxier in design, and should catch air rather than deflect it.

A "splitter" in the form of a flat shelf is now below the front bumper. And the current rear spoiler has been replaced with a wing that looks more like something on a street car than a stock car.

Both features are designed to improve racing conditions and make the COT compatible with various tracks. The splitter and the wing are both adjustable, so teams can tinker with them to improve handling.

The wing will push air both over and under it, giving the car more stability in traffic and improving the aerodynamics of the trailing car.

It's all supposed to improve the racing on the track — once the teams get used to it.

After Wednesday, everyone seemed to be mildly surprised.

"It actually drives better than our other cars do here," Earnhardt said. "It has exceeded my expectations at this point as to how the car is driving. I anticipated it to be a little more of a struggle. The racing (at Bristol) should be about exactly the same it has been."

See more stories in this category
Back to Previous Page
 
i dont see why they shouldn't run the whole schedule next season, unless of course we find a major problem in its races this season.
 
They might as well. Why go back and forth? The object is to save money. If they don't go full time in 08 that will cost more money going backward.
 
0019.Image.NULL,ArticleMediaImage.300,300,0,NULL,NULL.MGSpooler.img


http://www.tricities.com/tristate/tri/news.apx.-content-articles-TRI-2007-03-01-0010.html
BRISTOL, Tenn. – A crowd of 50,000 would seem somehow insignificant in the massive bowl that is Bristol Motor Speedway with its 160,000-plus capacity.

So the collection of several thousand race fans who trickled in and out of the stands Wednesday at the World’s Fastest Half Mile didn’t look like much.
 
They had almost as many people attending Bristol testing as there were at the California race!!!

[/bad joke]
 
Some of the tracks that have 2 races may need to give up one. Isn't that why The Rock lost both of their's?
 
Some of the tracks that have 2 races may need to give up one. Isn't that why The Rock lost both of their's?

Actually, that isn't the main reason that the Rock lost their races. The real reason is that there isn't anything in the area to help entertain the deep pocketed sponsors. And that is why the track in California will never lose it's dates. You gotta remember, it isn't about how many people attend the races, it's how much money is being spent there to get the high dollar sponsors that are needed to keep the sport going.
 
Actually, that isn't the main reason that the Rock lost their races. The real reason is that there isn't anything in the area to help entertain the deep pocketed sponsors. And that is why the track in California will never lose it's dates. You gotta remember, it isn't about how many people attend the races, it's how much money is being spent there to get the high dollar sponsors that are needed to keep the sport going.


Agreed!

Lack of motels in the Rockingham area was also a serious problem.

But I would think that if they ever do get a track in the Pacific northwest, it would logical to pull one of the the Cali dates and give it to the new track.

But since money drives the sport and not logic, who knows what they will come up with? Probably try to take another race away from the south.
 
Rockingham was my favorite track :mad:

It was one of mine too, CT.

Even if I had to work there that weekend, I still enjoyed going there.

Daytona was a friggin hassle this year. Wouldn't bother me in the least if I never went back there.
 
It was one of mine too, CT.

Even if I had to work there that weekend, I still enjoyed going there.

Daytona was a friggin hassle this year. Wouldn't bother me in the least if I never went back there.[/QUOTE]

I went to Daytona Speedway one time. Have no desire to ever go back.
 
People, People, People.....
Don't you know. There ain't nothing like SHORT TRACK RACIN'

Bristol, Martinsville
 
I like short tracks, road courses and AMS. Richmond is usually a great race too.
 
I was talking to a long time race fan this morning and he seems to be in the same vein as many of us here in that his interest in the sport has been waning for some time now. He said that he would enjoy it much more if there were more tracks like Bristol, Martinsville, and Richmond. No kidding. I'd say that the majority of us old fans would like to see more tracks like that, but the last I heard, there isn't any plans for tracks to be built like those. Even in the areas where the people think that NASCAR fans are beer bellied, stars and bars waving, rednecks, the tracks planned have been cookie cutter mile and a halfers.

The thing of it is about all this talk is, and you can take this to the bank, NASCAR isn't going to change it's direction as long as the sport continues to grow. Many of the newer fans are just glad that they are now able to attend a race in person rather than drive two or three thousand miles for the privlege. That has a big following, and I can attest to that fact. I'm not too sure that there are very many fans right here on this forum that aren't close enough to a track that they can drive there in the morning and head out after the race and still be able to get to work on Monday. Now I'm talking about the closest track, not the favorite one. We have any people here from Washington state? Nah, those are the people who believe that we here in the south are...well, you've read the reports. The Pacific Northwest is just about the only people who are the furthest away from any NASCAR Cup series races. The central plains states are probably next, but since there probably fewer people in South Dakota than there were who did attend the races in Rockingham, you know that NASCAR couldn't (repeat...COULDN'T) care less.

But what in the hell does all of what I just wrote pertain to the COT cars? :rolleyes:
 
Just happens Bristol, my favorite track is the closest track to me. I used to attend both races at N. Wilksboro also.
 
I'm actually probably closer to Talladega & Atlanta, but Bristol is the track/race I will not miss for any reason whatsoever. My dad got 4 seats in the DW grandstands when they were built & I haven't missed but one or two ever since.
 
Well if we're going to turn this into a poll on favorite tracks we like Lowes. And, my checkbook shows it. The other week we bought the May and Oct races. Thing is they had sold the seats for the 600 we normally sit in. As a compromise they upgraded us to the Ford Verandah even tho we don't belong to the Speedway Club. Now watch me really like those seats and have to drop the $2K each to join the club.
 
I gave up my May and Oct ticks for Charlotte. I had them for 20+years. They got too expensive. I kept the all star ticks. That is it for Lowes now.
 
Well if we're going to turn this into a poll on favorite tracks we like Lowes. And, my checkbook shows it. The other week we bought the May and Oct races. Thing is they had sold the seats for the 600 we normally sit in. As a compromise they upgraded us to the Ford Verandah even tho we don't belong to the Speedway Club. Now watch me really like those seats and have to drop the $2K each to join the club.

That was their plan all along! :bounce:
 
You're probably right. I already have permanent seats for college football and basketball. $6K total + yearly dues + tickets. Now along comes Lowes trying to entice me.
Oh, and it hasn't been that long ago that the Panthers hosted us to an exhibition game showing us how great the view would be from the seats they had available to sell. I must be on some list somewhere...
 
Back
Top Bottom