Paris Hilton

buckaroo

buckaroo

Here kitty, kitty, kitty
Joined
Nov 14, 2002
Messages
10,767
Points
513
Location
Winston Salem, NC
Okay, I know there are plenty of people here who have thoughts on this little twit getting out early, so why haven't anyone begun a thread before? I guess that if I said that I couldn't care less about this little girl, you'd probably say then why start a thread about her? Right? Well, it's just something to do since there doesn't seem to be very much traffic at the moment. (I don't know if the rest of you have had problems with R/F loading, but I couldn't get on for hours)

Anyway, today I heard from another person in the know, that what poor little Paris got in the way of incarceration was way over the top compared to what the norm is out there in LA. But most of the talk I've heard, almost all of it, is about how little time she's getting for what she did. Today I heard, as I said, the second source talk about this. This guy is a lawyer who deals with this sort of thing and he said that most people don't even get time in jail for this, but if they do, it's usually a one or two day stint at the most.

I don't imagine that most people know this and they base their opinions on what they would imagine would be a good sentence for this crime. But also, the perp also is a part of their thinking.

Though she was able to get out of jail after only three days of the 30 day sentence, or was it 23 days, or what. Anyway, she still is on house arrest and must wear the ankle bracelet. The castle she lives in is no doubt better than a jail cell, so though she is still confined to her home, she pretty much is free.

What are your thoughts? Be calm and nice now.
 
You're right, buck, I couldn't care less about the skinny little rich girl.

Maybe the judge did go over the top sentencing her, I don't know. But something needed to be done to get her attention.
 
I agree with that for sure, but I don't think that she got any message unless it's that she was able to get out of jail way earlier than she was supposed to. That in itself probably sent the wrong message to her.
 
She originally got 45 days. This was reduced to 23. Counting her pre-trial time she spent nearly 5 days in jail. Now she has to wear an ankle bracelet for the 45 days. That is pretty severe considering the charges.
Now what we need is a pool on how many days before she breaks the sentence and goes out partying. I say Tuesday...
 
barelypure said:
She originally got 45 days. This was reduced to 23. Counting her pre-trial time she spent nearly 5 days in jail. Now she has to wear an ankle bracelet for the 45 days. That is pretty severe considering the charges.
Now what we need is a pool on how many days before she breaks the sentence and goes out partying. I say Tuesday...
Click to expand...

I say tonight
 
This just in...breaking news...a judge has ordered her to court tomorrow to make a judgement if she should go back to the bighouse.

I can't believe I'm doing this! I hope I never hear that little twit's name again.
 
paris%20hilton%20mugshot.bmp
 
give her 60 days for all i care.

the toilet's cold and oyou only have 3 blankets. This isn't the hilton jail.


Let's send her on down to huntsville for 10 days see what happens.
 
buckaroo said:
This just in...breaking news...a judge has ordered her to court tomorrow to make a judgement if she should go back to the bighouse.

I can't believe I'm doing this! I hope I never hear that little twit's name again.
Click to expand...

She was ordered to finish her sentence under house arrest, meaning she could not leave her four-bedroom, three-bath home in the Hollywood Hills until next month.

City Attorney Rocky Delgadillo said he learned of her release the same way as almost everyone else — through news reports.

Then, late Thursday, he filed a petition questioning whether Sheriff Lee Baca should be held in contempt of court for releasing Hilton — and demanding that she be held in custody. Soon after that, Superior Court Judge Michael T. Sauer decided to haul Hilton back to the courtroom.

"It is the city attorney's position that the decision on whether or not Ms. Hilton should be released early and placed on electronic monitoring should be made by Judge Sauer and not the Sheriff's Department," said Jeffrey Isaacs of the city attorney's office.

Sauer himself had expressed his unhappiness with Hilton's release. When he sentenced Hilton to jail last month, he ruled specifically that she could not serve her sentence at home under electronic monitoring.
Click to expand...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,279212,00.html
 
buckaroo said:
This just in...breaking news...a judge has ordered her to court tomorrow to make a judgement if she should go back to the bighouse.

I can't believe I'm doing this! I hope I never hear that little twit's name again.
Click to expand...
I bet this is one pissed off judge. Finally found a judge I like.

http://www.channel3000.com/entertainment/13459235/detail.html

Judge Orders Paris Hilton Back In Court
Report: Hilton's Medical Issue Mental, Not Physical

POSTED: 8:08 am CDT June 7, 2007
UPDATED: 9:05 pm CDT June 7, 2007

LOS ANGELES -- Hours after Paris Hilton was sent home under house arrest early Thursday, the Los Angeles judge who originally put her in jail ordered her back to court to determine whether he should return her to jail.


Superior Court Judge Michael T. Sauer issued his order after the city attorney filed a petition late Thursday afternoon demanding to show cause why Sheriff Lee Baca should not be held in contempt of court for releasing Hilton early and demanding that Hilton be held in custody.
 
TMZ has learned the reason Paris Hilton stayed at home while the lawyers and judge sat in court is because the Sheriff's Department refused to pick her up.

Law enforcement sources tell TMZ the Sheriff's position is that the judge does not have the power to order her to court. The Sheriffs believe they have sole jurisdiction to monitor and control Hilton while she is under house arrest.

The Sheriff's Department says they are the only ones authorized to take her anywhere. Thus, the standoff in court.
Click to expand...

Paris Hilton has arrived to Los Angeles County Superior Court, just under 30 minutes after officers handcuffed her and tossed her into the back of a Sheriff's cruiser. Hilton avoided the media frenzy at the court when Sheriffs used a private, covered entrance to escort her into the courtroom.

Kathy and Rick Hilton have just entered the building as well.
Click to expand...

And the poor little thing was photographed crying in the back of the squad car.

0608_paris_car_cry_inf.jpg
 
Hey what'cha doing over here while I'm busting on you on the trivial thread... :)
 
back to jail she goes!!! Good for that Judge :beerbang:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19102663/

from the article:

Paris Hilton was taken from a courtroom screaming and crying on Friday after a judge ordered her returned to jail to serve out her entire 45-day sentence for a parole violation in a reckless driving case.
“It’s not right!” shouted the weeping Hilton. “Mom!” she called out to her mother in the audience.
 
Entire 45 days...cool good for her, at least some one had some balls for a change.:D :beerbang: :beerbang:
 
Once upon a time, years ago, I worked in an IT capacity at the Women's Prison here in Raleigh. Oh the stories I could tell.
Paris better be happy she has a private cell. And, she will probably get special meals from the outside as well.
Some of those gals would love to have her in the general population I'm sure.
 
I wonder how much that Sheriff's getting paid?

Oh, and FYI, the mussed hair and pale complexion devoid of makeup??? Bogus She was made up to look pathetic. I don't think it worked.
 
I personally have very little sympathy for someone caught driving drunk. I have had friends killed by drunk drivers. In my opinion, 45 days is rediculously lenient for doing something that knowingly puts innocent lives in danger. :mad: :angry:
 
oh, poor baby. Maybe she needs a longer sentence.

I say a year in a maximum security prison sounds good.
 
Once again, I ask the question, what makes people feel the way they do about such personalities as Paris Hilton and Martha Stewart. Neither one of them did anything that hasn't been done time and time again. I'm not talking about the penalties that they got, but why are people so hard on them? I don't think that we even see this sort of vitriol towards politicians and that's hard to understand. I guess because both of them are huge personalities in the eyes of many Americans, what happens to them is news of a sort, but when the media becomes so overwhelmed with a subject, there's got to be a reason.

Are we here in American today, putting too much emphasis on entertainment/personalities? When you look back hundreds of years ago, entertainers were just that, entertainers and were more or less considered kooks. Yes, they performed a service and that was to entertain us, but other than that, they were ignored as it was understood that their purpose was to just that, entertain. Now, some of the highest paid people in the world are entertainers, whether it's sports, the theater or what. And listen, I don't begrudge any of them for making all the money they can doing what they do. Afterall, it's the public that allow them to make huges sums of money.

I thought of this today when I heard that Bono, of U2, criticized the Canadian PM for something he promised about aid to Africa. I thought, who in the world put Bono or any of those big name entertainers in charge of criticism of any government. Yes, they have the right to say what they want, but all they are doing is using their entertainment value as a sounding board for their own causes, which may or may not be what the overall public wants. If Bono really wants to be able to change the world, he should not just talk about it, but run for office so that he can actually do something. Then it hit me. If he or any of those entertainers were to run for office of some sort, they are risking losing their voice. While they could actually win a vote, my thoughts are that probably most of them wouldn't because of their radical nature. Then they wouldn't have as much say so because they would then know that their views are not as widely held as they think. As long as they are who they are and in the position they are, they have that mighty voice to the public. Also, if they were to actually win an election for some office, they would definately take a pay cut, and God knows, that is something they don't want.

A little off the Paris chat, but at least I got that off my chest. And back to Paris, does anyone believe that this will change her style? Not a chance. :einstein:
 
One thing tho, think of all the entertainers who will be able to move back to this country when Bush is no longer in office.
Oh, you say they never left even after having their public tantrums that if he were re-elected that they would go to Europe or where ever.
But, this might belong to the Podium...
 
Yahoo! had an interesting article that basically says the sheriff released her even though the judge explicitly stated 'no home confinement' to basically say, "You don't have power in MY jail Mr. Judge..."

It looks like the sheriff may be wrong about that...

Buck... I don't think anyone is being extra 'mean'... I doubt anyone on this board would be ok about someone getting a 'get out of jail free card.' I don't think it really has to do with money... just good ole fashioned justice. We're just inundated with the story! Remember, celebrity runs both ways... :)
 
vanzetti said:
Buck... I don't think anyone is being extra 'mean'... I doubt anyone on this board would be ok about someone getting a 'get out of jail free card.' I don't think it really has to do with money... just good ole fashioned justice. We're just inundated with the story! Remember, celebrity runs both ways... :)
Click to expand...

I didn't mean to infer that anyone was being extra mean here. It's just that I've heard from three different sources there in LA that what she got originally, was way too excessive in the first place. It doesn't mean that what she got, she didn't deserve, but rather taking into consideration everyone else in that court, or at least the majority, got much less for the same crime. Keeping that in mind, it seems that most people don't even think about that part. That's like saying "yeah!" when oh, let's say Kurt Busch gets a ticket for speeding in some little podunk town and has to pay a fine of 2 million dollars. Now I'm not comparing the two, only using it as an example. But she was given that sentence and while she can appeal it, she's got to do it the legal way.

Anyway, I'm done with the little twit and off to another subject...Lindsey Lohan....................... :cool:
 
Now it comes out that her grandfather made a sizable donation to Sheriff Bacca's re-election campaign. Who says money can't buy love...
 
barelypure said:
Now it comes out that her grandfather made a sizable donation to Sheriff Bacca's re-election campaign. Who says money can't buy love...
Click to expand...

More like she did the Sheriff a little favor if you get my drift.:growl: :growl:
 
I don't know about that but the money is real. Just like Mel Gibson's anti-semitic tirade that didn't come out until much later. Mel had done some campaign spots for this Sheriff. It appears he is for sale...
 
Speaking of my old avatar, while on vacation I was able to snap a pic of one of our more adventurous posters. See if any of you can guess who this is...

normal_GrannyDaisyDukes.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom