mike honcho
Knuckleheads
I would like to see 1 race without the plates though.
There are 36 races each year and only four of them are plate races. How many cars do you want to see go through the catch fence? If you want to see pure speed, then there are other series that are much faster than stock cars and race weekly. I've seen plenty races at both Daytona and Taladega without restrictor plates and while some of them were great, others were pretty stinky, as they say in racing. I'm a big Bill Elliott fan and loved it when he came from two laps down to win a race, none of those laps were earned by the "lucky dog" or from a caution either. Good racing? I guess. Exciting, hardly. For the most part, unless you were at the track, you weren't able to watch Bill's progress as he came through the field. Those old days of single file racing and sling shots were only sweet at the end of the race when they really did race. What do we see these days? Though the drivers would dearly love for that single file racing again, anyone behind the third or fourth place car is going to try and make a pass, and it won't be at the end of the race, thus we wee two, three and four wide racing. If that isn't exciting to you, those cars going around at about 190 plus MPH, they you are asleep on the couch. I see enough single file, aeropush racing at most of the tracks and need this rush of excitment now and then just to keep my interest in NASCAR.I would like to see 1 race without the plates though.
Indeed. Although I am not a fan of plate (pack) racing and not a fan of the COT, I am a fan of safety. Several bad crashes (Rusty, Petty, Allison, etc.) brought on the restrictor plate. Terrible wrecks still occur at these superspeedway tracks but I think the plate, combined with Roush's roof flaps have helped keep the cars on the ground and out of the catch fence when the "big one" happens.There are 36 races each year and only four of them are plate races. How many cars do you want to see go through the catch fence?...
Since I inserted this subject in another thread, I thought it might be a good time to discuss this again with Taladega coming up. I totally understand the viewpoint of the drivers on this, but I also understand the reasoning for the plates. Of course the drivers want more response from their cars, not just for racing, but also for safety sake when they need to take defensive measures. Personally, as I've stated before, I enjoy the plate races both at Daytona and Taladega. Not even Bristol can match the edge of the seat suspense that those two tracks provide. It just shows how great these guys really are, going around those tracks at those speeds two, three and sometimes four abreast. Every lap I see two or three wrecks coming up, but it usually doesn't happen when I think it will. Sometimes there is the "big one", but not always. That is something that the media always stresses though, and of course, that is what some people wait to see.
So what is your argument for or against those restricter plates?
Plate racing is here to stay. It sucks. Earnhart was killed in a plate race, so please do not hand me any B.S. about them being safer. If anything they make the racing more dangerous because there is more of a chance that a big one will collect many cars. If Nascar is so afraid of speed, why can they go faster at 1 1/2 mikle tracks? Just restrict the engine size if you must, but plate racing is nothing more than driving around in a circle, trying to avoid the big one, and then making a move on the last lap. It is boring and it is costing Nascar many fans. They could not sell out the Daytona 500.
It is boring and it is costing Nascar many fans. They could not sell out the Daytona 500.
Plate racing is here to stay. It sucks. Earnhart was killed in a plate race, so please do not hand me any B.S. about them being safer. If anything they make the racing more dangerous because there is more of a chance that a big one will collect many cars. If Nascar is so afraid of speed, why can they go faster at 1 1/2 mikle tracks? Just restrict the engine size if you must, but plate racing is nothing more than driving around in a circle, trying to avoid the big one, and then making a move on the last lap. It is boring and it is costing Nascar many fans. They could not sell out the Daytona 500.
Bigdaddy says that plate racing is the cause of empty seats at Daytona. Sorry pal, that isn't the reason. He says the races are boring. I wonder what excites him. He says it was restrictor plates that caused the death of Dale Earnhardt. What about Kenny Irwin, not to mention the blocking that DE did on that fatal day. Finally I wonder if Bigdaddy watches any of the plate races. If so, then the question is why?
I like plate racing. Like buckaroo says, closer racing, edge of the seat excitment, and a very unpredictable result.
I get tired of holding my breath and not breathing during these races.
The wife and I were there at Daytona in 2001 and witnessed the end of DE. One of the last things that DE said over his radio was something like this... "Tell that SOB Waltrip that I'm back here blocking for him". Only caught just that little bit and then we went to another channel. Couldn't believe what had happened but it didn't surprise me that he was blocking for the teams that he owned. Had he been a little further forward, I do believe that he wouldn't have blocked and would have gone for the win. Might have saved his life and we might today be chatting about whether or not he should retire.I so badly wanted to say the same thing but thought I would get flamed. Big E blocked before but always while he was trying to win a race. I do believe that was the first time he ever did it so someone else could win a race...
The wife and I were there at Daytona in 2001 and witnessed the end of DE. One of the last things that DE said over his radio was something like this... "Tell that SOB Waltrip that I'm back here blocking for him". Only caught just that little bit and then we went to another channel. Couldn't believe what had happened but it didn't surprise me that he was blocking for the teams that he owned. Had he been a little further forward, I do believe that he wouldn't have blocked and would have gone for the win. Might have saved his life and we might today be chatting about whether or not he should retire.