Rate The "New" Bristol Race

I honestly had no problem's with Bristol. I give it a 10 . It's like I read else where . I want to see a race not a bunch of wreck's. I mean a few wreck's are fine ,but some people act like they want constant wrecking.

Also heard that one reason there wasn't a lot of beating and banging was due to the Chase being so close and people trying to get in to the 6 remaining spot's.

Maybe it was due to the fact that the track is "new" and they were driving the COT there .

I know there was a good amount of 3 wide racing at time's.

It seemed like the race lasted longer than usual. I know that whenever I've went to Bristol it seemed that the race was over before it started .Guess its due to the track being so small.

I just don't like Carl or Kasey :idunno:

Guess if it were drivers I liked, l would've liked it more.
 
I will add to what buckaroo stated one more thing......the racing is becoming homo-genized.

Now just a minute there pardner, I thought we were going to leave the driver's sexual leanings out of the conversations...
:confused:
 
Strange, last year(I think), Matt Kenseth lead over 400 laps to win. I call that domination.

Kenseth dominated the last two races before last Saturday and Junior dominated the 2004 race. The last 3 races, prior to last Saturday, were real snoozers. And don't forget Stewart's domination in the spring, only a part failure stopped him.
 
Kenseth dominated the last two races before last Saturday and Junior dominated the 2004 race. The last 3 races, prior to last Saturday, were real snoozers. And don't forget Stewart's domination in the spring, only a part failure stopped him.

Don't forget in 2003, where Keebler Elf wrecked Sterling for the win.

2002 was the last real exciting race at Bristol. Lots of wrecks, emotional displays and a great finish!
 
Back
Top Bottom