Well, somebody has to do it :lol:
And I bet you sweated, and sweated!Originally posted by Eagle1@Sep 6 2004, 12:36 PM
I'll give it a solid 9.5.
If you chose to boycott the race, that's sure your option. 2 days of many actual racing lead changes & 3 & 4 wide racing throughout the field all around the track is pretty darn good racing to me. JMHO
It was well worth braving the heat for 2 days to be there.
Not a chance...........once Jeff Gordon blew up there was no one on the track that could race with Elliott. That 38 car was awesome all race long. He could drive it anywhere on the track he choose to.........high, low middle........it made no difference!!Originally posted by 24thunder@Sep 7 2004, 07:35 AM
Martin might well have won if not for the late race cautions.![]()
U are referring to Jr.,NASCAR has another scoring pad for HimOriginally posted by barelypure@Sep 8 2004, 08:11 AM
With the comments so far I wonder if this race following Bristol is one reason for it being down graded as much. It was a good race with some different faces up front.
I do have one question that TIVO couldn't answer for me. Near the end of the race Lil'E came in 9th to pit and went out 6th but lined up 2nd. I played the spot over to make sure I was counting correctly. But, in the end it didn't matter they weren't able to hand him this race as he quickly faded to the rear where he had run most of the day anyway.
I guess some things will remain a mystery to me...![]()
And I was wondering if you followed Mikey to the wrong track again, cause everyone sitting around us seen it. Maybe you should get new seats, like over near turn 4 if you want to see great racing.Originally posted by racerx11@Sep 6 2004, 01:02 PM
What race were you at?I didn't see any four wide racing.
lots of drama though and some great cars upfont racing for the win. With 10 to go you didn't know who was going to win. I give it a 9.