Rut Roh brain

S

SST55

Guest
Courtesy of www.FrontStretch.com
BREAKING NEWS: Website Established To Oust Brian France, Third Witness Comes Forward
by Tom Bowles

In a surprise development in the Jeremy Mayfield case, a third, private citizen is corroborating claims Brian France ordered Mayfield black-flagged during a dispute with then-owner Ray Evernham. A retired business attorney, Michael J. Miller, says he was told by former France in-laws the NASCAR CEO gave the order while drinking scotch during a race at Indianapolis in August, 2006.

"Any notion that Vince and Sandy Garcia have somehow concocted the ‘black-flag’ story simply to breathe new life into Jeremy Mayfield’s lawsuit is completely false,” Miller said in a release. "The very same NASCAR Substance Abuse Policy that’s being used to run Jeremy Mayfield out of the sport is what Brian France was allegedly violating during the 2006 ‘Allstate 400 at the Brickyard.’”

Explaining he's known about the incident for over two years, Miller's revelation also comes with a twist: a new website called Blackflagbzf.com which contains an online petition to remove France as CEO. Within it, the site purports illegal campaign contributions by France in 2008 along with other "incidents" of misbehavior that could cause issues far beyond his firing.

"At this point, Brian France has more than just a perception problem,” Miller claims. “He’s facing serious claims of official misconduct and legal wrongdoing which, if proved, demand accountability.”

"[The mission is] to call attention to the alleged misconduct of NASCAR’s highest officials, and to call upon NASCAR’s stakeholders to take swift action to restore the legitimacy of the organization as a competitive enterprise.”

There was no comment from NASCAR on the matter at press time.



Hmmmmm
 
Interesting...wonder if this has any merit or will just dissapear in a pay off?
 
SST55 said:
A retired business attorney, Michael J. Miller, says he was told by former France in-laws the NASCAR CEO gave the order while drinking scotch during a race at Indianapolis in August, 2006.
Click to expand...
i hate defending brian france but consider the source of these allegations. former in-laws aren't always the best source for factual inside information.
 
dpkimmel2001 said:
Sounds like total BS.
Click to expand...

Why do you say that?

I got a haircut last Saturday and the girl that cut my hair was telling me that she met a woman on a cruise who had a cousin who used to cook for Brian's ex in-laws and she said the same thing.

:D
 
SlowNeasy said:
i hate defending brian france but consider the source of these allegations. former in-laws aren't always the best source for factual inside information.
Click to expand...

considering it was former in laws who said they saw Mayfield doing meth hmm:rolleyes:
 
Smoke14 said:
Why do you say that?

I got a haircut last Saturday and the girl that cut my hair was telling me that she met a woman on a cruise who had a cousin who used to cook for Brian's ex in-laws and she said the same thing.

:D
Click to expand...

Well, if I would have only known that before. You've now convinced me. :D
 
kkfan91 said:
considering it was former in laws who said they saw Mayfield doing meth hmm:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

That's a good point. Most everyone believed Mayfield's ex bro in law when he said Mayfield did meth. Now that it's France's ex in laws, they shouldn't be believed because they're ex's.
 
JustMe said:
That's a good point. Most everyone believed Mayfield's ex bro in law when he said Mayfield did meth. Now that it's France's ex in laws, they shouldn't be believed because they're ex's.
Click to expand...

...THAT is a good point..:rolleyes:

Good to see some new evidence for Mayfield
 
Clutch said:
...THAT is a good point..:rolleyes:

Good to see some new evidence for Mayfield
Click to expand...

So Brian having Mayfield black-flagged in a race in 2006"where there is no record of them throwing a black-flag that race" is the reason Mayfield failed a urine test for drugs in 2009?
 
mike honcho said:
So Brian having Mayfield black-flagged in a race in 2006"where there is no record of them throwing a black-flag that race" is the reason Mayfield failed a urine test for drugs in 2009?
Click to expand...

Hmmm.....Maybe Brian erased the record of the black flag....and fabricated the positive test results?.........dunno treally do we Mr Honcho?

...thats just my huncho ;)
 
Smoke14 said:
Why do you say that?

I got a haircut last Saturday and the girl that cut my hair was telling me that she met a woman on a cruise who had a cousin who used to cook for Brian's ex in-laws and she said the same thing.

:D
Click to expand...

There you have it. What more proof do you need?:D
 
Things I've read over time from various sources:

The lab that did the original testing doesn't adhere to the Fed regs, didn't say if they where more or less strict in their testing.
The second sample sent to another lab was "contaminated".
Mayfields mom said he was a meth head. Sorry my friends I have no personal knowlege of meth but I thought meth destroyed your teeth? His look fine to me.
Brain and his divorce, he wants the records sealed, he's in violation of the pre nup he agreed too at the time by not paying child support and alimony.

I don't know what to think but there seems to be a lot of strange dealings surrounding him, perhaps he's the meth head??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom