D
Digger
Guest
... got his payback for Indianapolis, so, I don't need to hold a grudge over that anymore.
.... And, why didn't the reporter tell Tony that Kevin said that it was his (Kevin's) fault? My guess is that he wanted to get an angry reaction from Tony. Didn't work.
I have a feeling that Tony's interview came before Kevin's --- the reporter hadn't heard Kevin say it was his fault.
But on the flip side, maybe the reporter did, and chose NOT to say anything to see if Tony would go off.
On the PRN broadcast after the race, Harvick mentioned Indy and said if Tony wanted to fight to come see him. When we got home, I scanned ahead on the DVR and his explanation on TV was a lot different.
Imagine that. I bet he got a "talkin to" after the Goodyear deal.
On the radio Kevin said if he's mad tell him to bring it on or something to that effect.
On the PRN broadcast after the race, Harvick mentioned Indy and said if Tony wanted to fight to come see him. When we got home, I scanned ahead on the DVR and his explanation on TV was a lot different.
I'm a Tony fan (when he doesn't go too far)...but that was about as close of a "racin deal" as I've ever seen. When I saw it live (on TV) I thought Tony came down on him - probably to protect Hamlin. After the replay (and listening to the commentators) I reversed and took Tony's side. They showed it one more time and I muted the sound and slow-mo-ed it. It just looked like a racin deal to me then - two guys going for one piece of real estate on the track. Harvick could have avoided that last bump though - maybe.
Pay no attention to what Tony said though - if he feels he was wronged he will get payback...no matter the facts
He already got his payback ... remember Indy?
Tony cost Harvick a top 5 at Indy, and Tony caused Harvick the win at Bristol (again).
And I usually don't agree with you but in this cae I do. Kevin was more at fault than Tony at Bbristol.Andy I usaully agree with you. But Tony didnt cost Kevin anything. It was Kevin you started the crash after all