technical specs / regulations

G

gmelchior

Guest
hi there.

im quite a NASCAR n00b, so dont wonder if i ask stupid things :(
i've been looking around the NASCAR Homepage for a while, but couldnt find any technical data about the cars, can any1 help me out?
so far i found some data on some team pages about winston cars, but nothing about busch and trucks. anybody has a good hint for me?
or could some1 explain me the differenze between winston cars and busch cars (stupid question??)
also im very interrested in the NASCAR technical regulations, which i couldnt find anywhere.
dont wanna bother with more stupid questions...

thnx in advance

chris
 
SHould be able to find some stuff for ya, but I don't have it in my bookmarks so you'll have to hang loose for a bit.

Welcome to the board!

And if you're real new (n00b baffled me for a sec) welcome ot he sport as well!!:)

JUst keep your eye on the board, all kinds of info comes on here and the place is full of good fans. Jump in anytime with questions and don't hesitate to put up answers either, we're all just fans here!!
 
Not exactly what ya asked for but some real good stuff.

The suspension pages are real good for startser and apply to all three series and you get some comparisons.

Basic diffs between the Busch cars and WC cars are small

The BGN cars (and the CTS trucks) run the same engine as the WC cars except they have a smaller carb and are allowed to run roller cams.

The Busch cars minimum weight is 3200 without driver (I think) while the trucks and WC cars' is 3400.

Check this site:

Link
 
Correction:

BGN minimum weight is 3300 or so I am told and the wheelbase is 5" shorter at 105" . I thought they changed that last year but one of my buddies says no, he's usually right.
 
thnx hardscabble for the nice welcome :)

if u interessted:
i was on research myself and found a nice comparison:

http://jayski.thatsracin.com/pages/diffs.htm

is it true, that Busch cars have only ~ 530 hp? sounds a bit less to me, if they run same engines as Winston.

i even found some more Information concerning regulations, but not the info i´m looking for.
any1 knows where i can the offical NASCAR technical regulations?
or are they kept secret?

and 1 more (stupid?) question:
why are so many drivers in the point ranking (about 80-120), and only like 40+ set as active? i found this info on the NASCAR homepage

im sure more questions will arise...

thnx for the help
chris
 
Technical Regulations
The `official' NASCAR rules and regulations are not made available to the general public or to the media. NASCAR reserves the right to disseminate those regulations only to those teams it deems of merit as seriously contending participants.

The Winston Cup series used to be known as Grand National. The name was changed in 1970. Busch Grand National (BGN) now refers to the NASCAR series which is the main feeder series for Winston Cup. The Busch sponsorship started in 1985. Winston Cup is considered the premier series in NASCAR. There are a lot of WC drivers who double-up between the two series, but BGN is sort of a "lesser major league," somewhat akin to the World League to the NFL in American football or the IHL to the NHL in ice hockey.

The Busch Series runs mainly on short tracks (tracks less than a mile in length) over shorter distances, while the Winston Cup series tends to concentrate on tracks greater than a mile in length. The Busch Series has picked up a few superspeedways in the last few years.

There are some differences between WC and BGN cars, but they are being made more similar. In 1995 the Busch series is going to use 358 cid V-8 engines with a 9:1 compression ratio. Teams can still run the old V-6 engines in 1995, but not from 1996. The 9:1 compression engine is also the powerplant for the new NASCAR Supertruck series, and there are rumors that the 9:1 will be the required engine in 1996 for the Winston Cup series. The 9:1 is supposed to be more reliable and cheaper to maintain than the high compression engines that are currently in use (especially at the superspeedways).

Secondly, The BGN car weight has been increased to 3100 lbs and the WC cars have decreased to 3400 lbs. The story here is it is currently a big jump from going to a BGN car to a WC car. This weight shift is supposed to make the transition from BGN to WC easier. Wheelbases are 110 inches for both WC and BGN.

from: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~bspahh/rasfaq/node114.html
 
Editor’s note: The Florida Dodge Dealers 400K event--round two of 24 races in the 2001 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series—-saw the debut of GM's SB2 V8 engine, with a 12.0:1 compression ratio, in the Chevy Silverado race trucks. This is the same powerplant used in the NASCAR Winston Cup and Busch Grand National cars. Teams, however, are allowed to continue using the 9.5:1 compression V8, as well. Following is an interview with Jim Covey, NASCAR Engine Development Manager for GM Racing/Engineering, on the approval in 2000 of the GM SB2 engine in the Craftsman Truck Series.

Q) First of all, what is the SB2 engine?
A) The SB2, for Small-Block Second Generation, marks the first time in the 45-year history of the GM small-block V8 that a package of engine components has been specifically developed for NASCAR racing competition. The SB2 made its debut in the Winston Cup series in 1998.
Q) What specifically is the difference between the small-block and the SB2?
A) The SB2 engine package consists of new cylinder heads with revised valve angles and valve layout. The intake manifold designs have also been revised to complement the revised valve arrangement.

Q) With Chevrolet's winning record in the Truck Series, why change?
A) After 45-plus years of development and racing, the small-block in the original configuration had reached its full potential. We listened to what our customers—race engine builders and race teams—said was important to them in a race engine design, and we really focused on customer satisfaction issues with the SB2. Reliability, durability and ease of building and maintaining a competitive engine were key considerations in the design stage. Compared with the original small-block V8, it's easier for a team to assemble and tune a competitive SB2, and the individual components last a lot longer. For instance, many Winston Cup teams used to replace cylinder heads after two to three races because they would develop stress cracks. With the SB2, it's not uncommon for cylinder heads to be used in eight to 10 races.

Q) What will happen to all of the small-block engines out there now?
A) Converting from the existing 18 degrees cylinder head engine configuration currently used in Truck will not make all of the base engine components—such as the block, cranks and connecting rods—obsolete. If a team desires to sell an existing engine instead of converting to an SB2 configuration engine, there are several racing series such as the NASCAR Southwest Tour, Winston West and many other late-model series around the country where the engines could be used.

Q) Can a team still use its current 18 degree cylinder head engine configuration or must it convert to the SB2 immediately?
A) NASCAR has grandfathered the existing small-block engine so teams need not convert to the SB2 immediately. However, with NASCAR’s revision to the compression-ratio limit and the revised carburetor rules in Busch, teams will be required to make revisions to their existing engines to convert them to the increased compression limit of 12.0:1. Therefore, it makes sense to make the conversion to SB2 at the same time that revisions are being made to the engines to meet the new rules for 2001.

Q) How much more power will the SB2 generate? And what part of the increase in power will come from the increase in compression ratio that all the engines will gain?
A) Every dyno is different, so the absolute numbers vary from builder to builder. But most of the teams are seeing a power improvement of a few percent over the old small-block V8. They are all confident that the GM SB2 is competitive with other manufacturers' engines in terms of power, and they are really pleased with its durability, reliability and user-friendly design. As far as the horsepower increase due to the increase in compression ratio, most people think it will be about 3 to 4 percent.

Q) Does the new SB2 engine package require the use of all new GM components?
A) Not at all. To begin with, all engine components, including the engine block and cylinder heads, have a finite life and are replaced after a certain number of races. How quickly a team upgrades to the SB2 package will be determined based on its available manpower, budget and time. To convert an existing 18 degree engine to an SB2, four major components must be replaced: the cylinder heads, intake manifold and valley plate. GM Racing has developed a plan to assist teams during the conversion process with both technical and parts support. There is a sizable quantity of the necessary components available from GM and the distribution of the parts is being controlled by GM Racing to assure that each team is able to acquire a sufficient quantity of the parts to compete.
Several of the components can be reused from the current engines. These include the cylinder block, oil pump, carburetor, connecting rods, crankshaft, flywheel and oil pan. Some of the engine components that will need to be converted to the SB2 configuration are parts that have a limited life span and need to be replaced frequently as part of a general maintenance program. These include pistons, camshafts, valves and valve springs, lifters, pushrods, rocker arms and gaskets.

Q) Won’t a new engine configuration for an already proven winner change the competitive level in the Truck Series?
A) We really don’t think that will happen. You’ll notice there is constant change going on. NASCAR keeps a close eye on everything in order to maintain a level playing field for all teams and manufacturers. One manufacturer might get a new nose or front valance, while another gets some other needed adjustment. Dodge, being the newest manufacturer to join the Truck Series, has changed a number of parts and pieces over recent years in order to improve its competitive position within the series. With the SB2, some of the benefits will be off-track rather than on-track. Of course, starting with a new engine design increases potential areas of development.

Q) Will NASCAR benefit from the approval of the SB2 engine configuration?
A) Yes, the SB2 engine will be helpful to NASCAR in a number of areas. First, by having the SB2 approved in all three top NASCAR series, the inspection procedures will be more consistent between the inspectors of the various series. Second, GM Racing has worked very closely to establish several reference points that are used by the inspectors to mount the NASCAR inspection fixtures. This includes precisely machined dowel-pin holes that accurately locate the NASCAR templates onto the cylinder head.


from http://popularmechanics.com/automotive/mot...ce/index2.phtml
 
Back in the early days of NASCAR, the "stock" cars were fairly close to stock. Over the decades, however, ingenuity on the part of the racers and the factories helped the vehicles grow increasingly into race cars, with less and less similarity to the stock cars they represented. Nowadays, the only real connection between a Winston Cup car and the street version is the general appearance—which is largely an illusion of paint—and the logo on the car's nose.

NASCAR rules very clearly define most of the critical features of all race cars: Wheelbase is 110.0 in. and minimum weight is 3400 pounds. Each car must be powered by an overhead-valve V8 engine sitting between the front wheels, driving the rear ones. And the body profile of each "brand" of car must adhere to NASCAR-certified templates. Within those parameters, each of the Roush Racing Tauruses is fairly representative of and similar to all the front-running Fords in Winston Cup. But even within the tight rules, each team has its own stamp of individuality and some proprietary tweaks. Within a five-car team, like Roush Racing, those proprietary tweaks are even further refined as the team may experiment with different setups on the different cars. At Roush Racing, the process is further complicated, and therefore more tightly controlled, than at other teams since the team builds all of its own cars and trucks from the ground up, while most Winston Cup and Craftsman truck teams buy rolling vehicles from builders and engines from engine builders. With total control over every weld, nut and bolt on the car, team owner Jack Roush feels he can make each of his race cars slightly better than the competition's and still meet the very strict requirements of the NASCAR rule book and the "Room of Doom," the tech inspection site at each race.

The 20,000-sq.-ft. shop in Mooresville, N.C., that houses the entire No. 99 Exide Taurus operation employs some 20 full-time fabricators, assemblers and mechanics who build about 30 complete cars each season for Winston Cup and Busch Grand National competition (the Craftsman trucks are built at Roush Racing's Michigan shops). That means a bunch of superspeedway cars, a bunch of cars for all the intermediate tracks, a few short-track cars for places like Bristol and a few more road-racing cars for the races at Watkins Glen, N.Y., and Sears Point in California.Every car that Roush Racing builds starts out as a pile of steel tubing in a rack on the shop wall that is measured, cut, polished, jigged and welded into a super-strong chassis befitting a 3500-pound race car. NASCAR rules stipulate the diameters and thicknesses of all the tubing used, and even the basic configuration of the frame. The left-side frame rail is at least 4.5 in. off the ground, the right one 6.0 in. All the chassis for all the teams are built at the Roush shop in Liberty, N.C., and sent to the team shops for plumbing, bodywork and painting. The steel Taurus bodies are carefully developed for aerodynamic performance during the off-season and the racing season. Roush Racing's five Winston Cup teams spent more than 60 days last year in wind tunnel experimentation, spending more than $1 million on wind tunnel time alone in 1999.

from : http://popularmechanics.com/automotive/mot...us/index3.phtml
 
and heres how the evolution of the stock car came to be

Evolution of the stock car: Part I
February 6, 2002
11:12 PM EST (0412 GMT)
Throughout the 53-year history of NASCAR, its race cars have been transformed from road-going, lumbering true "stock" cars into the sleek, technologically advanced machines that we see today on ultra-modern speedways. In tracing the evolution of the cars that we know today as the Winston Cup Series, it's necessary to go back to the beginnings of NASCAR and its "Strictly Stock Division."


It all started with races on the famed Daytona beach/road course in the late 1940's.
When NASCAR was formed in 1948, there was a definite shortage of new cars in the post-war era. The feeling was that race fans wouldn't stand for new cars being beat up on a race track while they were driving a rattletrap pre-war automobile, so "Modified" cars were the early staple of NASCAR racing.

However, in 1949, NASCAR president Bill France Sr. re-visited the idea of racing the cars that people actually drove on the street -- late model family sedans. Since no other racing organization had seized the idea, France figured it might take root and create added interest.











The success of the modern Winston Cup Series proves he was correct. From the racers' perspective, putting a race car together was not a high-dollar deal. If a brand-new Buick sold for about $4,000, due to the lack of modification that could be done to it, the car could be raced for very little more of an investment.

In some instances, rental cars were actually used as race cars by point-chasing drivers who had no locked-in "ride" for an event. Cars were typically either driven to the track or "flat-towed" behind pick-ups and family sedans.

Other than tweaking and tuning of the engine, nothing could be done to these early Strictly Stock cars. The window glass front, back and sides was intact. Ropes and aircraft harnesses were used as seat belts. Roll bars -- which were mandated in 1952 -- were neither required nor often installed.

One thing the strictly stock designation encouraged was a great diversity of manufacturers on the track. The first official Strictly Stock Division race had nine makes come to the line, including Buick, Cadillac, Chrysler, Ford, Hudson, Kaiser, Lincoln, Mercury and Oldsmobile.

Some of the biggest problems were tire; wheel and suspension failures brought on by stresses that were atypical of normal road use. These concerns brought about novel solutions such as one detailed by two-time Grand National (forerunner of Winston Cup) champion Tim Flock, who described a trap door in the floorboard of his race car that he could open with a chain to check right front tire wear.

"When the white cord was showing, we had about one or two laps left before the tire would blow," said Flock of the 'early-warning system.'

Due to the rough-surfaced dirt tracks that were predominant in the early days of the sport, the only modification that was allowed was a reinforcing steel plate on the right front wheel to prevent lug nuts from pulling through the rims on conventional wheels.

Otherwise, racing stock cars in the early days of the sport was very much a seat of the pants endeavor. But it was one that spawned innumerable legends of drivers who created them, literally, with their own hands, feet and indomitable wills and courage.

Evolution of a stock car: Part II
February 6, 2002
11:11 PM EST (0411 GMT)
It all started with races on the famed Daytona beach/road course in the late 1940's. Throughout the 53-year history of NASCAR, its race cars have been transformed from road-going, lumbering true "stock" cars into the sleek, technologically advanced machines that we see today on ultra-modern speedways. In tracing the evolution of the cars that we know today as the Winston Cup Series, it's necessary to go back to the beginnings of NASCAR and its "Strictly Stock Division."

For a certain number of years, that concept certainly worked and, through the support of fans, competitors and manufacturers, it continued to thrive. But the variety of race tracks in use and the intensity of the competition level necessitated various modifications. While many of these were instituted "in the interest of safety," manufacturers found that there were ways to integrate "high performance" parts and pieces into their mainstream production line, thereby making these "hot" parts eligible for use in Grand National racing, the forerunner of the Winston Cup Series.

One of the first items produced specifically for stock car racing was a racing tire manufactured and distributed by the Pure Oil Company in 1952. Prior to that time, street tires were all that were available for racing applications.











Not everything that was developed through this period was an integral part of the cars themselves. Two-way radios were first used in a NASCAR race at the 1952 Modified-Sportsman race on the beach/road course at Daytona Beach, Fla. Their use developed until they became an indispensable piece of equipment on a Grand National race car.

In the early 1950s roll cages also made more of a widespread appearance. Tim Flock won the 1952 Modified-Sportsman race in Daytona Beach, but was disqualified due to his roll cage being made of wood. Although some novel uses of bed frames and other iron devices were created for roll bars, their use stiffened race car chassis and improved cars' performance.

One of the first major changes in race car development came in 1953, when the Oldsmobile, Lincoln and Hudson car companies introduced "severe usage" kits, primarily composed of suspension parts, in response to an alarming spate of failures to spindles, hubs, axles and other suspension pieces.

The manufacturers were also discovering that they could introduce high performance options in their street cars that would make them eligible for the race track. Hudson's "Twin H" carburetor setup was one such tweak that Hudson drivers used to win 22 of 37 races in 1953.

In 1955, Chevrolet and Ford, mirroring their intense spirit of competition that's displayed in 2001, also had factory-backed programs. But it was Chevrolet's introduction of the 355-cubic inch "small block" V8 engine that was one of the most significant developments in the history of stock car racing. That engine, with very minor changes, is still in use by General Motors race teams across the country in most racing series.

Through this period, Marshall Teague of Daytona Beach, one of racing's true innovators who was largely credited with bringing the Hudson Motor Car Company and Pure Oil into racing, pioneered the use of Chevrolet truck spindles and suspension parts when he was competing in AAA stock car racing. The giveaway that a car was running the heavier axles and beefier suspension components was a six-lugged wheel, not the typical five-lugged version.

Buick unveiled a major coup in 1957 when it had finned aluminum brake drums on its Buick Roadmaster. The car, made famous by Fireball Roberts, used a braking system that dissipated heat more efficiently due to the use of aluminum and the finned design.

As the decade of the 1950s began to come to close and the superspeedway era was about to dawn; GM made a major change to the frame design of its cars in 1958. It debuted an "x-frame" design with a coil spring rear suspension, departing from the "box frame" with leaf spring rear suspension that was more popular and better understood by the racers.

Consequently, very few 1958 Chevrolets were used; particularly early in the season, as the racers chose to go with what they were familiar with. However, innovative mechanic Henry "Smokey" Yunick had the system figured out and driver Paul Goldsmith won the final beach/road course race, using a 1958 Pontiac with the new design.

The newer setup would prove to be the "hot tip" on the big tracks that would begin to open with the advent of Daytona International Speedway in 1959.

It was the next step in the ongoing evolution of the Winston Cup stock car.


Evolution of a stock car: Part III
February 6, 2002
11:11 PM EST (0411 GMT)
While a "superspeedway boom" occurred from 1959 to the early 1960s, with no less than four major speedways being built in Daytona Beach, Fla.; Hanford, Calif.; Concord, N.C.; and Hampton, Ga.; the automobile manufacturers -- who had signed an agreement that "got them out" of racing in 1957, gradually realized that to sell new cars, it certainly helped to win races.

Despite accruing the knowledge of what it took to win Grand National races, the period was interesting in that both engine and body configurations went through several "generations" and radical changes as race cars, by and large, matched what was pushed in the showrooms by the manufacturers.

One of the most interesting occurrences in 1959 came when the Ford Motor Company abandoned its "top of the line" Galaxy model to use its Thunderbird as the race car of choice. The Galaxy was a fairly bulky car that year, so Holman & Moody, Ford's acknowledged racing arm, built a "fleet" of T-Birds to compete in Grand National racing, the forerunner of the Winston Cup Series.











The T-Bird was lower and sleeker than the Galaxy but it still fell within the dimensional parameters set in the NASCAR rules...even though the car had been created as a "sports car" that was designed to compete with Chevrolet's Corvette.

Although the T-Bird continued to compete, Ford returned to its "premier" Galaxy Starliner model in 1960.

Conventional, full frame cars were still the norm as purpose-built tube frame race cars were still out on the Grand National horizon. Stories of race teams -- as Ray Fox's did in 1960 to win the Daytona 500 -- picking up cars from showrooms only days before races and converting them to race cars were commonplace.

In the General Motors' camp, teams had figured out the coil spring rear suspension setup that was introduced in 1958 and virtually everyone was running the 1959 Chevrolet on the big tracks, where it was particularly effective. This "light bulb" effect certainly led some to believe that the racers must have gotten some suspension geometry help from Detroit, but the manufacturers were still laying pretty low due to the Automobile Manufacturers Association (AMA) agreement that had disassociated them from the sport.

Through this period, of course, innovation often was the answer to necessity, and with many NASCAR races still conducted on dirt tracks and with pavement tracks sometimes coming apart, screens, grillwork and other protective devices were often de rigeur.

The early days found race teams not necessarily locked-into a particular manufacturer's model or even make. They were able to do some amazing things with cars that looked particularly unwieldy to the naked eye: Witness the monstrous Oldsmobile with which Lee Petty won the inaugural Daytona 500, which was a somewhat tank-like ride. Petty jumped back and forth between Chrysler and Oldsmobile in that time, depending on which car was more suited to the task at hand.

As the "superspeedway boom" era continued, manufacturers began to pay more attention to aerodynamics. The 1963 Ford Fastback Galaxy was used in the manufacturer's literature and was advertised as a race car. The 1960-61 Starliner had what was actually an effectively aerodynamic roofline. In fact, with the 1962 car a pretty boxy proposition, Fred Lorenzen ran a 1962 Galaxy with a 1961 Ford roof in a one-shot deal for the Atlanta 500 -- and won the race in the car's only appearance.

General Motors had a grip on the Grand National championship in the early 1960s, with Rex White and Ned Jarrett winning titles in 1960-1961 in Chevrolets and Joe Weatherly copping the titles in 1962-1963 -- primarily in Pontiacs. In the 1961-1962 season Pontiac won more races than any manufacturer in the history of the Grand National Division in consecutive years: 52.

Mercury added a twist to the manufacturers' battle when it entered racing in a bigger way in 1963 with its Marauder model. Bill Stroppe, the West Coast's answer to Holman & Moody, handled the Mercury competition program with a similar assembly line approach. Unknown newcomer Billy Wade swept four straight races in 1964 driving a Mercury.

Mercury prompted the switch of legendary NASCAR car owner Bud Moore to the Ford Motor Co. camp when Moore -- in the absence of significant support from General Motors -- switched from Pontiac to Mercury. Weatherly took the 1963 championship but had to pick-up rides for most of the year. Ford scored another coup when it grabbed Fireball Roberts, who won his first race for Ford in 1963 at Bristol (Tenn.) Motor Speedway. The swapping of personnel is one part of stock car evolution that has been around since the beginning.

Shock development, which today is acknowledged as critical to race car performance, also experienced more emphasis in the early 1960s. The popular "Air Lift" shocks were being phased out and Monroe and Gabriel became heavily involved in shock development for racing applications.

Tire development also continued. Firestone was the dominant tire company, but Goodyear was involved to a limited degree. Increasing speeds made these developments important.

The end of this period also brought an end to one unique item. Through the early 1960s, Lorenzen still used a trap door in the driver's compartment to check tire wear. By 1965, however, nobody used the device that was once a favorite of dirt track competitors.

Another significant advance during this period occurred as roll cage structures began to become a more integral part of the car and as such, were used to stiffen the chassis and improve a car's handling as well as serving as vital protection.

A variety of triangulated bars, from front to back, across the mid-section of the car and also in the doors were as much to stiffen and strengthen the cars as they were to serve as protection. There was a tremendous amount of flex inherent in the "x-frame" cars used in the 1958-60 period. Smokey Yunick was one of the first car builders to use the roll cage as an integral part of the car's chassis.

Ford had unleashed the flow of relatively open factory support when it repudiated the AMA agreement in 1962. While General Motors remained mostly silent, within a few weeks Chrysler announced it would develop "high performance" parts for stock car racing.

Another big issue of this period was in the engine compartment.

Noted mechanic Fox was the mastermind behind Chevrolet's so-called "mystery engine," a 427-cubic inch "high lift" high performance piece that would replace the 409-cubic inch engine that was often referred to as a "boat anchor" because of its weight. Yunick, the other half of the legendary mechanical pair that lived in Daytona Beach, was also involved in the development of that engine.

While much of the mystique of this engine was as much hype as it was fact, at the time Ford claimed it spent $1 million chasing the development curve on Chevy's powerplant. Junior Johnson, driving Fox's 1963 Chevrolet, sat on a lot of front rows with the combination, but as had often been the case with other potent mixes, in most cases the car was either a top-5 finisher or it broke.

Among the team's accomplishments in 1963 was sweeping the front row for the Firecracker 400 at Daytona International Speedway, with Johnson and G.C. Spencer doing the honors.

The "engine wars" reached a peak when in 1964 Richard Petty brought a Plymouth hemispherical combustion chamber engine, or "hemi," and cleaned house at Daytona, including winning the first of seven Daytona 500s. The Plymouth and Dodge body styles had been streamlined somewhat first. The hemis: Plymouth's "Super-Commando" and Dodge's "Hemi-Charger" now had an appropriate platform in which to sit.

The engine had first been produced in the early 1950s, but had been shelved with the AMA ban in 1956. Chrysler engineers also came up with a double rocker arm system used in conjunction with the hemi heads. This combination, which created a free-breathing combustion chamber, produced a good bit of top end horsepower, particularly on high-speed facilities.

Ford came back with its "tunnel port" 427-cubic inch engine. And Ford had a very well handling race car. Following the Daytona 500, the fourth point race of the season, Ford won 11 out of the next 15 races -- 13 of which were on short tracks. Plymouth and Dodge won two races apiece in that stretch.

As was the case in many other aspects of racing, NASCAR kept a close eye on these developments and took action, as it became necessary. The repercussions from that highlighted the next period in the evolution of a stock car.



From : http://www.nascar.com/2002/kyn/history/evo...kcar/index.html
 
again thnx a lot,

some nice infos, and pages; i nearly found everything i wanted.

so NASCAR tech regulations are not for puplic eyes!?
but why should they keep them secret?
u can acces almost every regulation from wichever racing series u want, but not nascar **scratches his head, wondering**
ok, since i cant look this up in the regulation i have a in deepth tech question:
any1 knows what clutches are used in NASCAR, and if there is any restriction on it? like diameter or material?
dont know if any1 can help me with this, but askin doesnt cost a cent :)

chris
 
Try this site to ask some of your questions of a technical nature. Not sure if these guys keep this place updated, but the pamel aboslutely knows what they are talking about.

The Jayski is a ltttle outdated, for example the 9.5:1 compression engines are gone, all the engines are now 12:1.

Anyway here's a link:

Racing Experts
 
Back
Top Bottom