SpeedPagan
The iRacing Guru
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2009
- Messages
- 19,354
- Points
- 1,033
So, I think it's time we admit something to ourselves, and admit something that NASCAR doesn't want to admit. Stock car racing isn't for tracks like Indy or really any track larger than 1.5 miles. That's because stock car racing used to be a short track sport.
The early days of NASCAR saw drivers competing on dirt on short tracks throughout the Southeast of the United States and it produced some of the best racing at the time. I think once NASCAR became popular in the 90s and had a huge influx of fans, they've moved away from what the sport really was about, which is why we get boring races like Indy.
Hel, the cars themselves should tell you that they weren't meant for tracks like Indy. Don't get me wrong, I love the Gen6 cars, NASCAR is def. moving in the right direction with the Gen6. However, they're not exactly aerodynamic enough to take advantage of a track like Indy. F-1 cars are built to be aerodynamic and fast, which is why they produce better racing at a larger track. The "boxy" shape of the stock car also causes aero-push problems on these kinds of tracks.
So what's my solution? Honestly, save for Daytona and Talladega, get rid of any tracks that's longer than 1.5 miles. The only reason I say keep Daytona and Talladega is because they're a staple in NASCAR schedule. However, I would get rid of both of their second dates. Daytona can still have the Daytona 500, but that's it and Talladega can still have one of it's races.
I'd also replace some of the 1.5 mile tracks with dirt tracks. There's gotta be more than one Eldora out there. Get in a good mixture of Superspeedway, short tracks, dirt tracks and some 1.5 miles track and you'll see fans fill up the stands again and the TV ratings going up.
The early days of NASCAR saw drivers competing on dirt on short tracks throughout the Southeast of the United States and it produced some of the best racing at the time. I think once NASCAR became popular in the 90s and had a huge influx of fans, they've moved away from what the sport really was about, which is why we get boring races like Indy.
Hel, the cars themselves should tell you that they weren't meant for tracks like Indy. Don't get me wrong, I love the Gen6 cars, NASCAR is def. moving in the right direction with the Gen6. However, they're not exactly aerodynamic enough to take advantage of a track like Indy. F-1 cars are built to be aerodynamic and fast, which is why they produce better racing at a larger track. The "boxy" shape of the stock car also causes aero-push problems on these kinds of tracks.
So what's my solution? Honestly, save for Daytona and Talladega, get rid of any tracks that's longer than 1.5 miles. The only reason I say keep Daytona and Talladega is because they're a staple in NASCAR schedule. However, I would get rid of both of their second dates. Daytona can still have the Daytona 500, but that's it and Talladega can still have one of it's races.
I'd also replace some of the 1.5 mile tracks with dirt tracks. There's gotta be more than one Eldora out there. Get in a good mixture of Superspeedway, short tracks, dirt tracks and some 1.5 miles track and you'll see fans fill up the stands again and the TV ratings going up.