As sad as this story is, I don't think TMS Speedway is at fault here.
The parents had to sign waviers saying that they understood the risks involved. Besides, this isn't something that TMS could have avoided. A driver lost control, and crashed into the boy and his family.
As sad as this story is, I don't think TMS Speedway is at fault here.
The parents had to sign waviers saying that they understood the risks involved. Besides, this isn't something that TMS could have avoided. A driver lost control, and crashed into the boy and his family.
Being a media-access member and participating in SCCA events at the speedway, I can agree that the lawyers will have a hard time with TMS's legal stuff. I've read it front to back, and they have some pretty far-out clauses in it. It can be pretty much shortened down to saying "Enter at your own risk, and don't come crying to us if you get hurt of your own or another person's negligence."
These days, partial blame is big in insurance. Here in North Carolina if you are involved in an auto accident, if you are to blame for any percentage, the other insurance company doesn't have to pay a red cent. In other states, insurance companies only pay what percentage that was negligent for their patrons.
As an example, last year the wife was sideswiped by a young girl as the wife was merging into a left turn lane. The young girl had moved to the left before the double yellow line and was given a ticket. The wife was not given a ticket and was let go. The young girl's insurance company claimed that the wife was partially at fault, using the reason "failure to be on the lookout". I've never heard of that before, but evidently it would be a reason to put some blame on the wife. It went to arbitration and the young girl's insurance company lost so they had to pay 100%.