J
jeefunk
Guest
On the postrace show on PRN, they were discussing the rule guaranteeing starting spots to the top 35 in owners' points. One gentleman called in and said to do away with the top 35, another said to make it only the top 12 who are guaranteed since that's how many make the Chase. I thought that was a little extreme, but I think they are on the right track, no pun intended.
Here's my thought:
IMO, the original idea of guaranteeing starting spots is to keep all the "major" full-time teams from getting ousted by part-timers, or possibly missing one race flooded with part-time teams and eventually costing them a shot at the championship, making the top 10, etc. In other words, a guy wouldn't have his season plan ruined because 20 part-time teams were trying to qualify for the Brickyard 400 (or any other race, just used that one as an example).
Well, now, for the first time in my memory, the number of full-time teams outnumbers the number of starting spots for a given race, which partially defeats the purpose of having the guaranteed starting spots. IMO, I think they should lower the number of guaranteed starting spots to either 25 or 30 simply because there are SO MANY teams deserving of a starting spot some weeks who get ousted because of the guy in 34th (again, just an example number) in owner points had a crap qualifying run, but gets his guaranteed spot because he's TWO spots ahead 36th, even though the guy in 36th may be a ton better that day.
Just wondering what some other people's thoughts were. I've seen some great ideas about stuff in here, hoping to see some more
Here's my thought:
IMO, the original idea of guaranteeing starting spots is to keep all the "major" full-time teams from getting ousted by part-timers, or possibly missing one race flooded with part-time teams and eventually costing them a shot at the championship, making the top 10, etc. In other words, a guy wouldn't have his season plan ruined because 20 part-time teams were trying to qualify for the Brickyard 400 (or any other race, just used that one as an example).
Well, now, for the first time in my memory, the number of full-time teams outnumbers the number of starting spots for a given race, which partially defeats the purpose of having the guaranteed starting spots. IMO, I think they should lower the number of guaranteed starting spots to either 25 or 30 simply because there are SO MANY teams deserving of a starting spot some weeks who get ousted because of the guy in 34th (again, just an example number) in owner points had a crap qualifying run, but gets his guaranteed spot because he's TWO spots ahead 36th, even though the guy in 36th may be a ton better that day.
Just wondering what some other people's thoughts were. I've seen some great ideas about stuff in here, hoping to see some more