US Supreme Court to test Obama's talents

Bucky Badger

Go Kyle Go
Joined
May 11, 2003
Messages
14,461
Points
783
Location
Madison WI
Ohhh boy. This could prove interesting.

WASHINGTON (AFP) – President-elect Barack Obama may have the rare chance to appoint two judges to the Supreme Court, giving the former law professor an opportunity to make a further lasting mark on American society.

Already observers are weighing in on what Obama could do in the key decision on replacements for the highest court in the land.

"It is quite likely he would choose a woman or a minority," said Nathaniel Persily, a law professor at Columbia University in New York.

"If he could find a Hispanic woman, that would be ideal, the best choice," he added.

Only two women have served on the Supreme Court, and two African-Americans have succeeded one another in the same seat, but never has an judge with a Latino background been appointed.

Hispanics are an ever-growing demographic in the United States, making up 15 percent of the population.

But beyond the race or sex of the candidate, observers are gearing up for appointments of politically progressive judges to the bench to replace the older liberals sitting on it today.

John Paul Stevens, appointed by president Gerald Ford, is 88 years old, and is expected to resign soon.

The nine justices are appointed for life.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20081106/pl_afp/usvotejustice
 
I wouldn't be surprised if both stevens and ginsberg retired in the next 2 years. I would be surprised if a flaming liberal was appointed. A qualified minority would be a good bet. Probably a centrist to mildy liberal. Definitely someone young(ish).
 
Slow, I think you are right about this one. If he tries to get someone who is a far lefty, there will no doubt be a fight, but who knows. Also, one really never knows how their pick will turn out. Some have ended up being totally the opposite of what they were thought to be. I guess in some cases, it's a crap shoot.
 
I really hope President Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices! I want my civil liberties guarenteed and equal opportunities-like marriage and adoption rights-for ALL (I know, I just got this sent to the podium, but that's OK, I'll take the slap on the wrist).
 
I really hope President Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices! I want my civil liberties guarenteed and equal opportunities-like marriage and adoption rights-for ALL (I know, I just got this sent to the podium, but that's OK, I'll take the slap on the wrist).


You civil liberties guarenteed......by Obama.....are you serious????
 
Ohhh boy. This could prove interesting.

WASHINGTON (AFP) – President-elect Barack Obama may have the rare chance to appoint two judges to the Supreme Court, giving the former law professor an opportunity to make a further lasting mark on American society.

Already observers are weighing in on what Obama could do in the key decision on replacements for the highest court in the land.

"It is quite likely he would choose a woman or a minority," said Nathaniel Persily, a law professor at Columbia University in New York.

I hope he doesn't appoint two left liberals.

There goes The Second Amendment. :(
 
I really hope President Obama gets to appoint Supreme Court Justices! I want my civil liberties guarenteed and equal opportunities-like marriage and adoption rights-for ALL (I know, I just got this sent to the podium, but that's OK, I'll take the slap on the wrist).

I don't know about all that. My neighbor seems to be pretty fond of his goat. I don't want to see him be able to marry it though. But then again, once you start changing the definition of marriage from the obvious man and woman, things start to get hazy. Why not a guy and his goat then, right? What about a guy and two women? What about three guys? Who are we to judge, right? Some people are just born with desires that are different than ours, they can't help it. Just ask pedophiles, and rapists, right? Why should we tell them that just because everyone else thinks it is wrong, they shouldn't be able to do it freely anyway, right? If it feels good do it, right?
 
I don't know about all that. My neighbor seems to be pretty fond of his goat. I don't want to see him be able to marry it though. But then again, once you start changing the definition of marriage from the obvious man and woman, things start to get hazy. Why not a guy and his goat then, right? What about a guy and two women? What about three guys? Who are we to judge, right? Some people are just born with desires that are different than ours, they can't help it. Just ask pedophiles, and rapists, right? Why should we tell them that just because everyone else thinks it is wrong, they shouldn't be able to do it freely anyway, right? If it feels good do it, right?

I agree Benevolent one! Once you change it to something else besides one man and one woman, you open a new door to allow orther types of marriage. So should be just two humans? (man women, man man, women women) or should it be a human and what ever the hell else?
 
I agree Benevolent one! Once you change it to something else besides one man and one woman, you open a new door to allow orther types of marriage. So should be just two humans? (man women, man man, women women) or should it be a human and what ever the hell else?
Mormonism :idunno:
 
Actually, in context to what Andy was replying to, I agree with him. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom