Lappy, an "in person" Pocono race is like Talledega or Daytona, you cannot see what is taking place. I've watched races at Pocono, Dayton and Talledega from the pit, the garage, the infield and the grandstands, all with the same results. Those races are better on television. The excitement and other fans around you make the difference but that is true at any track.
The Pocono race is exciting. The distance is right. One or two long, unrestrictor plate races are good as it shows durability of car, driver, pit crew and overall strategy.
NASCAR has changed so many rules and made the sport more inviting to the modern day fans who have no idea of the way races were won and lost. These are the same fans who might not say it but think it when the attention span spreads beyond the one hour and forty-five minutes psychologists tell us they have as a limit.
They are the "we want it to happen.....now!!! DAMMIT", crowd NASCAR is catering too.
Any race over the time mentioned is too long and gets complicated. Thus the changes to shorten a race. A long race, three different turns for setup, different banking, potential for equipment failure, strategy, all make the overall picture at Pocono a good one.
Point being the interview with Jimmy Johnson when he said Pocono is the most physically and mentally demanding track other than a road course. If this is too long, try a short track where the winner walks away after thirty or fifty laps.
To me, for race fans who appreciate what takes place to win at Pocono, it becomes more than an entertainment event that requires everything to be just right, as it was with Johnson and the 48 team yesterday, OR a driver man handling an ill car and bringing it home for a good finish as Ryan Newman did yesterday, aided by the "lucky dog" rule.
There was "drama" yesterday. There was the unknown of durability and there was the uncertainty of a G/W/C finish with strategy involved to plan for such an event.
This race was a solid 8.