H
HardScrabble
Guest
Seems the more info I dig into on TireGate - Round ?? the more conflicting the stories become. And the more I believe it is likely much ado about nothing new.
Tony Stewart attracted attention by complaining publically and viciously (again) about the Goodyear tires at Dover (again). Claims that the next to last set of tires were "bad" and cost him the race were somewhat negated by the fact that despite Tony's claims that no changes other than tires were made the facts as reported during the race disputed the "no change" story. Air pressure adjustments were reported as having been made.
Then we hear that Goodyear is bringing "old" tires to the track. How old is old, no one has made any real statement to that issue. Nor has anyone bothered to relate if "old" tires are common at other tracks. We do know that the tire used at Dover was only introduced one year ago. So one can perhaps assume that the oldest tires could only have been a year or so old.
Then the tale is that Goodyear has scrubbed the date codes off the tires to hide its sins and secrets this necessary information from the teams. Conspiracty is afoot here . Then I find a tire specialist for one of the teams who comes forward and says "all the information is right on the tires". He goes on to say that he was able to mix and match the tires to pevent any surprises. And truth be told, most teams seemed to accomplish this as well.
Another crew chief is reported to say that he bought 17 sets of tires and threw 4 of those sets out. That is reason for complaint of course, if you are paying for the tires. But it also demonstrates that if you do your work, the problems could probably be identified.
And since talk now seems that Gibbs will lose his tire deal (again) because of Tony's remarks, one has to wonder why the team did not identify their problems and if not enough "good" tires had been acquired simply go get more. After all according to the reports the "tire deal" means you don't pay for them, so the cost to Gibbs would have been just about a total of zero.
Perhaps the one thing that everyone agreed on is that Dover is hard to match up to with chassis and tires.. And that teams have pointed to bad tires there for years. Nor have I read or heard of anyone who claims this problem will be avoided in the future, no matter who supplies tires. So has Larry Mac likes to point out when asked about late race pit stops and adjustments. You got what you got, shut up and drive.
Tony Stewart attracted attention by complaining publically and viciously (again) about the Goodyear tires at Dover (again). Claims that the next to last set of tires were "bad" and cost him the race were somewhat negated by the fact that despite Tony's claims that no changes other than tires were made the facts as reported during the race disputed the "no change" story. Air pressure adjustments were reported as having been made.
Then we hear that Goodyear is bringing "old" tires to the track. How old is old, no one has made any real statement to that issue. Nor has anyone bothered to relate if "old" tires are common at other tracks. We do know that the tire used at Dover was only introduced one year ago. So one can perhaps assume that the oldest tires could only have been a year or so old.
Then the tale is that Goodyear has scrubbed the date codes off the tires to hide its sins and secrets this necessary information from the teams. Conspiracty is afoot here . Then I find a tire specialist for one of the teams who comes forward and says "all the information is right on the tires". He goes on to say that he was able to mix and match the tires to pevent any surprises. And truth be told, most teams seemed to accomplish this as well.
Another crew chief is reported to say that he bought 17 sets of tires and threw 4 of those sets out. That is reason for complaint of course, if you are paying for the tires. But it also demonstrates that if you do your work, the problems could probably be identified.
And since talk now seems that Gibbs will lose his tire deal (again) because of Tony's remarks, one has to wonder why the team did not identify their problems and if not enough "good" tires had been acquired simply go get more. After all according to the reports the "tire deal" means you don't pay for them, so the cost to Gibbs would have been just about a total of zero.
Perhaps the one thing that everyone agreed on is that Dover is hard to match up to with chassis and tires.. And that teams have pointed to bad tires there for years. Nor have I read or heard of anyone who claims this problem will be avoided in the future, no matter who supplies tires. So has Larry Mac likes to point out when asked about late race pit stops and adjustments. You got what you got, shut up and drive.