Charlie Spencer
Road courses and short tracks.
Saying "Explore alternate date options" is the same as when she tells you "We should see other people, but we'll always be friends."
Richmond is going to have a rough FY.**** this season, I guess. Road America replacing Toronto with another race is a net gain but Richmond was probably the event I was looking forward to the most after the 500.
Richmond joins IndyCar's 2020 cancellations
IndyCar’s anticipated return to Richmond Raceway’s exciting short track won’t be happening in 2020. RACER.com has learned that the June 27th race at Richmond has been canceled and…racer.com
Road America set for switch to July doubleheader
Toronto’s loss could be Road America’s gain and a way to try and help preserve IndyCar’s ever-changing schedule. RACER has learned that the June 21 date for Road America has been …racer.com
Richmond would’ve been the slowest oval by a sizable margin. It’d be safer than somewhere like Texas for sure, and from testing it sounds like they had found a good pretty racy package. Not sure how this effects the two-year contract but I hope they get a solid gate next year, really disappointing otherwise.I may be alone but I'm okay with Richmond being sacrificed. I'm just not fond of an open-wheeled series on banked ovals. I don't like Texas much; no way I'm fond of a race on a track half that size. Just too much opportunity to screw up.
So I'm okay with RA getting a second date, although I would have preferred the Glen.
The current schedule has five oval races so I don't see another oval race being added. I think this schedule is a good compromise.Richmond would’ve been the slowest oval by a sizable margin. It’d be safer than somewhere like Texas for sure, and from testing it sounds like they had found a good pretty racy package. Not sure how this effects the two-year contract but I hope they get a solid gate next year, really disappointing otherwise.
I’m really not sure they can work another oval in there as a replacement, without a gate they’re almost impossible to pull off. It certainly isn’t the final schedule update we’ll have either way.
Being decent to their enployees?Okay, dumb question. Why doesn't Ferrari lay people off? Local labor laws and / or union contracts?
Yep. They could lay people off but they don't want to.Being decent to their enployees?
It's good enough given the circumstances for sure, I wish they would lengthen the Iowa races though. Right now they have them listed as 150-lappers which wouldn't even take an hour. Maybe a couple of 200-lappers.The current schedule has five oval races so I don't see another oval race being added. I think this schedule is a good compromise.
Racing is in Ferrari's DNA. I very much doubt they'd kick people out of their 'family' just because a series said they can't spend as much as they like to anymore.Okay, dumb question. Why doesn't Ferrari lay people off? Local labor laws and / or union contracts?
FCA is missing out on an opportunity for pushing the Alfa brand.This is setting up for disappointment if/when they don't pull the trigger lol. I do think a WEC program is the most likely as they'd most likely want to build their own chassis.
Racing is in Ferrari's DNA. I very much doubt they'd kick people out of their 'family' just because a series said they can't spend as much as they like to anymore.
I think that's actually what they were considering before Marchionne died. Alfa branding makes more sense in the context of racing against Chevy and Honda too.FCA is missing out on an opportunity for pushing the Alfa brand.
They can afford to do both, especially with the decreasing F1 costs. I say use the Alfa brand on the chassis with "Ferrari" engines, which is a true fact with the Gulia Quadrofolio.
Okay, dumb question. Why doesn't Ferrari lay people off? Local labor laws and / or union contracts?
First - I'm sure this is a factor, particularly right now, as Ferrari's home region struggles to survive the coronavirus devastation. And Ferrari has unparalleled ability to attract sponsorship to cover the costs. Also, the Agnelli clan, which controls both Ferrari and FCA, is in a delicate situation with unions and regulators as they attempt to merge FCA into Peugeot... not a good time to announce redundancies.Racing is in Ferrari's DNA. I very much doubt they'd kick people out of their 'family' just because a series said they can't spend as much as they like to anymore.
Okay, dumb question. Why doesn't Ferrari lay people off? Local labor laws and / or union contracts?
No, the dept. didn't include them on a list. Omission isn't the same as exclusion.The Department of Homeland Security says race car drivers aren't athletes.
A quarter of a century later, the philosophy behind the IRL finally wins.The Department of Homeland Security says race car drivers aren't athletes.
This would keep Palou and van Kalmthout, who don't live in the US, from participating in the race at Texas.
DHS asked to include international drivers on U.S. access list
Indiana Senator Mike Braun has asked Department of Homeland Security Acting Secretary Chad Wolf to include motor racing in the organization’s list of international athletes to be granted access to …racer.com
I’d forgotten all about the new halos!Firestone weren’t able to produce new tires for Texas due to shutdowns, so they’ll be running right sides from the fall aeroscreen test at TMS last year and IMS-spec left sides, all with 35-lap maximum stints. What would be a three-stop race now becomes at least a five-stop race. Hopefully the tires are able to do their job or it could get ugly.
Tire stint limit implemented for IndyCar's Texas return
NTT IndyCar Series season teams will need to adjust their routines when the action gets under way next week at Texas, as drivers are being asked to limit tire use to 35 laps with each set of Firest…racer.com
IndyCar rookies to get 30-minute pre-race Texas test
Among the rolling changes to the NTT IndyCar Series’ 2020 schedule, private and open tests have been cleared from the compressed calendar, and while it won’t have a large impact on veteran drivers,…racer.com
This sounds like it could be a disaster. Hopefully I’m wrongFirestone weren’t able to produce new tires for Texas due to shutdowns, so they’ll be running right sides from the fall aeroscreen test at TMS last year and IMS-spec left sides, all with 35-lap maximum stints. What would be a three-stop race now becomes at least a five-stop race. Hopefully the tires are able to do their job or it could get ugly.
Tire stint limit implemented for IndyCar's Texas return
NTT IndyCar Series season teams will need to adjust their routines when the action gets under way next week at Texas, as drivers are being asked to limit tire use to 35 laps with each set of Firest…racer.com
IndyCar rookies to get 30-minute pre-race Texas test
Among the rolling changes to the NTT IndyCar Series’ 2020 schedule, private and open tests have been cleared from the compressed calendar, and while it won’t have a large impact on veteran drivers,…racer.com
Uh, this series was on shaky ground for several years already. I’m not sure it bounces back from taking a whole year off.
I’m hopeful Kyle’s scholarship rolls over to whatever he does next. It’s a really weird spot, a lot of people have suggested dropping a rung of the ladder, but usually Pro 2000 because the gap from F2000 to Pro 2000 isn’t substantial and F2000 really sorts guys out before they get to Lights. And then Lights are a significant step up and a decent representation of what to expect at the IndyCar level.Terrible news, but Andretti has kept the series on life support for sometime. Sponsorship is hard to come by for them. I'll tell you what, maybe this could lead to more opportunity for guys like Kirkwood and maybe even Santi to get a couple of races in IndyCar itself.
Longshot, but it could work. Taking a step back for them would be useless on the ladder.
Uh, this series was on shaky ground for several years already. I’m not sure it bounces back from taking a whole year off.
Probably not, especially factoring in that FIA F3 Americas just started a couple of years ago and Honda are to begin awarding a Lights scholarship to the champ; it's basically about to be parallel with Pro 2000.I don't pay enough attention to know the answer, but is three rungs on the development ladder beneath IndyCar wise?
If Indy Lights as currently constructed was to dissolve, I would think there would be a consolidation and the Pro 2000 series would effectively become Indy Lights.
“It actually came together very quickly in the last, I'd say 36 hours,” Andersen told Autoweek. “I spent a fair amount of time on a video conference with Roger Penske reviewing a number of things. The challenges that IndyCar faces with the schedule this year, with the coronavirus thing, dates moving and changing and shrinking and everything else, and the Road to Indy being challenged as to where we're going to fit in. We lost our spot at the Indy Grand Prix because it got thrown onto the Brickyard (400 weekend on July 4) and then they added onto the Harvest Grand Prix (Oct. 3), and there was no room for us there either. Then, Road America went from a four-day event to a two-day event.
“IndyCar owns Indy Lights and I went to them with some of the challenges we were faced with. Where were we at with NBC Sports Gold for the Indy Lights teams because that was part of the deal. So in discussing all of this, we talked about challenges getting drivers into the country, challenges with some of the teams losing drivers who had sponsor issues because of dropped dates. I moved their budget into next year and it just all became a big pile of stuff.
“Roger seemed to think that pausing Indy Lights and reconstituting it for a stronger next year would be a better plan given all the challenges that we were faced with. It wouldn't be my first call, but after listening to all that he thought and all the plans that he has to strengthen Indy Lights next year, I agreed to it. And it is their series. It's ultimately their call. I didn't have to agree with it, but they wanted my buy-in to their view. So I appreciate that.”
It could work, some teams could afford it.I’m hopeful Kyle’s scholarship rolls over to whatever he does next. It’s a really weird spot, a lot of people have suggested dropping a rung of the ladder, but usually Pro 2000 because the gap from F2000 to Pro 2000 isn’t substantial and F2000 really sorts guys out before they get to Lights. And then Lights are a significant step up and a decent representation of what to expect at the IndyCar level.
I guess those guys try to grab some partial rides in the big cars this year? Like you said, there’s no point to taking a step back.
Don't read the comments just an FYI.
Don't read the comments just an FYI.
It was a smart move to make, be safe about it.I’ll take your word for it but I’m guessing it’s why Pockrass had to “clarify” things on Twitter today.....