I judge Darrell's career the same way he openly judges Richard and Pearson when comparing himself to them. He was most outspoken when he didn't get inducted alongside Pearson. DW QUOTE "It was so much easier back when they were getting all them wins".
The guy is a self centered dick, but he was a great driver IN HIS DAY. From the stats just posted, you can see how his numbers jumped when he switched over to an organization that was winning championships already......often by cheating. Cheating, or going well beyond the grey area, was much more rampant back when ole' DW was getting all them wins, and Junior was the king of rule bending. When NASCAR started really cracking down on him, DW's numbers took a nose dive.
He had good numbers with the 4 posted DiGard years too, no titles but almost an averaged 20 % win ratio.
If cheating tainted him, Cale is inflicted too with his Johnson titles. As well as Bobby Allison's title with Gary Nelson, does anybody believe Nelson only got creative with the #10 Sacks R&D car? (Bobby wasn't happy about the #10 getting the newer tricks, but he still had Nelson in 83).
Or does anyone believe that Elliot's 85 NASA rocket would meet today's strict tolerance system. Obviously a way of life for anybody wanting to win these non boy scout events in the Day. DW just talked more about that culture.
Pettys big motor at Charlotte was the one that got publicity. In the early 70s (71, I think) Petty and Cale both were suspected of having oversized motors at Charlotte, and some believe 3rd place Allison was paid hush money to drop the complaint.
There's Bobby, Daytona and Bumpergate too.
So yeah, The tech line was softer then, that's no surprise, and it should be obvious that racers then and now maximize every tolerance or non-enforced limit/rule. But that did not stop owners from hiring who they believed was the best talent.
Nascar has a tougher tech line now, but it still has CC's named Chad, or a 90s Ray Everhamn car that was banned. Or the Brad K/ Paul Wolf(s) abusing every possible pit lane timing mark. That's just timeless racing.
The timeless universal nature of racers are clear, and I don't think it taints any of them, DW or Chad included.
Could DW, be a pain, a jerk, Jaws (plus more adjectives) and not sweet at the HoF? absolutely. Did that affect his or JJs driving ability? Apparently not.
The nose dive imo, was the 1990 broke leg, and age.