buckaroo
Here kitty, kitty, kitty
Okay, I know for some of you, just the mention of Danica is hateful, but one of our member's reply to another thread prodded me to start another conversation.
The reasons for disliking her are numerous and to each his own. But, just as my wife mentioned to me, and the main reason for starting this conversation, why do people think that Danica is such a good driver? So she won one race in the Indy series, so what! I told her that I can name a big number of drivers in that series that never won a race, rain shortened or what. Then I told her that I can name even more drivers in NASCAR that have never won in the top series yet they are still trying to make the big show. One particular driver that is pretty popular moved up to the Cup series at the same time as two other guys who have between them, five Cup titles and many wins, yet this guy has yet to win one single Cup win. Saying that Danica's win in Japan was a fluke, while that might be true, it also says the same for any number of wins in NASCAR that ended the same way. A win is a win, no matter if it's rain shortened, a fuel mileage win or a win after the fact based on NASCAR's rules. In the end, people forget about the circumstances about the win, UNLESS its Danica.
A question for any Tony Stewart fan, which I am one of them, what do you think of his fuel mileage wins? Some of those have attributed to him winning the championship. Should he give them back?
The reasons for disliking her are numerous and to each his own. But, just as my wife mentioned to me, and the main reason for starting this conversation, why do people think that Danica is such a good driver? So she won one race in the Indy series, so what! I told her that I can name a big number of drivers in that series that never won a race, rain shortened or what. Then I told her that I can name even more drivers in NASCAR that have never won in the top series yet they are still trying to make the big show. One particular driver that is pretty popular moved up to the Cup series at the same time as two other guys who have between them, five Cup titles and many wins, yet this guy has yet to win one single Cup win. Saying that Danica's win in Japan was a fluke, while that might be true, it also says the same for any number of wins in NASCAR that ended the same way. A win is a win, no matter if it's rain shortened, a fuel mileage win or a win after the fact based on NASCAR's rules. In the end, people forget about the circumstances about the win, UNLESS its Danica.
A question for any Tony Stewart fan, which I am one of them, what do you think of his fuel mileage wins? Some of those have attributed to him winning the championship. Should he give them back?