S
Skoalbandit33
Guest
I'll be honest...the logo looks like Fallopian tubes
[
What would you know about them?
I'll be honest...the logo looks like Fallopian tubes
[
wife had a high risk pregnacy. Spent a lot of time looking at those diagramsWhat would you know about them?
wife had a high risk pregnacy. Spent a lot of time looking at those diagrams
what kind of person is Julia?Updated that race22 story with quote from Julia Landauer too
Finished 18th a lap down. 7 races to go.
I didn't see anything wrong with it. Sometimes I end up saying something I never intended. Maybe that's why my friends call me Aole. I don't mean to be one, but yet I manage to be one.I meant to make chili, but everyone who ate it got sick.
Just because I meant to do one thing doesn't prevent results I didn't intend.
I saw she was in the top 5 once and then either at the beginning of a stage or after a caution she was in 6th or 7th but she was getting passed like she was nailed to the ground. Penske may be getting a 4th car ready for her in 2018.
If I remember, there was a caution toward the end of a pit stop cycle. She was one of five cars left on the lead lap when the caution flew. I don't think many cars were able to take the wave around, so there weren't many cars on the lead lap when they restarted. Finishing P5 in a group that small doesn't impress me much.She restarted P4 with 28 laps to the end of stage 1. She finished stage 1 in P5. This was rather impressive, considering how hard they're racing up there at the end of stages.
Regarding DP's future in Cup I will refer to Dave "Tiger" Williams quote on HNIC over 40 years ago and say she is "Done like dinner." Of course anything can happen and she could be piloting a top cup car next year.
Sounds like shifting the blame for under performance.......I've tried being her fan and she's almost had me a time or two in the past few years but she keeps hurting herself with statements like this, basically to the effect that she would have been a winner if she had had better teams. Guess she thinks she would have done better if she had been at HMS or JGR:
"As for her career: “Have I had the best car with the best engine, the best, best, best, best, best?” she said. “Probably not. Have I had good teams? Absolutely? Have I had good equipment? Absolutely. The challenges are those last little details and having a group that believes you can do it and is willing to go beyond the call of duty for the job. All those small, small, small little details that stack up to make something special that goes on track. That’s something that hasn’t always been there.”
Read more: http://autoweek.com/article/monster...details-kept-her-winning-nascar#ixzz4uOM9WgJi
That is one BS statement.Man, she has had grade A equipment her whole career.
What was JJ driving?Tony Stewart did win a championship but was driving JJ.s cars.
That is one BS statement.
When she ran for Junior his whole team was second rate and needed to take Rick on as partner
to get some decent engineering.
Tony Stewart did win a championship but was driving JJ.s cars. None of their own cars won a race until Harvick and his MWR crew chief came on board. Even Kurt Bush had a real hard time in their garbage cars and is out of the chase in the first round.
Explain how SHR is suppose to be so good.
Oh boy, can I open this can of worms? Pleeeeeease?Apologies if this has already posted but it pertained to Danica.
NASCAR asking official sponsors for help in finding new rides for Wallace, Patrick
https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com...0/02/Leagues-and-Governing-Bodies/NASCAR.aspx
Why not? Seems to me they should be more involved in sponsor recruitment. As a potential sponsor, it's much easier to go to a central source than individual teams. A central point of contact may also do a better job of matching a sponsor to a driver and team that are a good corporate fit.Not A fan of NASCAR asking sponsors for help
Why not? Seems to me they should be more involved in sponsor recruitment. As a potential sponsor, it's much easier to go to a central source than individual teams. A central point of contact may also do a better job of matching a sponsor to a driver and team that are a good corporate fit.
I wonder if they're going to offer any assistance in getting Kenseth sponsorship as well?
I don't know. In that post I was examining only the concept of NASCAR helping find sponsors, not who they were targeting.I wonder if they're going to offer any assistance in getting Kenseth sponsorship as well?
Unless there's a sponsor in love with Matt, I think he's priced himself out of the market.I wonder if they're going to offer any assistance in getting Kenseth sponsorship as well?
Johnsonville Brats and Wisconsin Dairy Farmers, maybe? That big mobile grilling rig J'ville has would be the best thing on the track since DJ ran the Big Brown Truck.Unless there's a sponsor in love with Matt, I think he's priced himself out of the market.
Maybe, but who in the public knows those negotiation figures.Unless there's a sponsor in love with Matt, I think he's priced himself out of the market.
None of us, so we engage in some good old fashioned "wild-ass-speculation".Maybe, but who in the public knows those negotiation figures.
I'm certain Aspen Dental loves Danica. She's still endorsed by Coke, she has some pull in some cases.
Just who else is going to fill those voids though?
I don't know. In that post I was examining only the concept of NASCAR helping find sponsors, not who they were targeting.
See my previous comment regarding DFD. However, I see the biggest difference between trying to find a sponsor for Wallace vs. Kenseth and Busch, is that Wallace can be had for a much smaller paycheck than a couple of past champions.
Oh, and to answer my own questions, I'd back Bubba. As a sponsor, Danica's appeal to race fans is about done. Bubba's still a fairly fresh face with an appeal outside the usual demographic. As an owner, I've seen what Danica can do and I'd rather give someone else a shot.
Say skills are the primary factor. If you had to choose between two equally skilled drivers, would you take marketability into account as a tie breaker?I guess I have an older, possibly antiquated way of thinking in that drivers get rides based on ability instead of image and targeted demographics.
Not trying to be sarcastic here as it's likely that my way of reasoning hasn't quite caught up to the changing times in Nascar.
Say skills are the primary factor. If you had to choose between two equally skilled drivers, would you take marketability into account as a tie breaker?
Good or bad, that is the new NASCAR, its the new racing these days, money talks and is more important than talent , talent still means something, but having your teams finances covered for the year means just a tad bit more now. You can still get rides based off of just talent these days, but its not as easy as it once was. And sponsors what drivers that are marketable, you can have all the talent in world, but if the sponsor feels you are not marketable enough, then you get passed up.I guess I have an older, possibly antiquated way of thinking in that drivers get rides based on ability instead of image and targeted demographics.
Not trying to be sarcastic here as it's likely that my way of reasoning hasn't quite caught up to the changing times in Nascar.