I share your pain.I hate the car-buying process. That's one reason I usually drive them until they're dead.
Mine is a 1999 with 197K miles on it. Still does what I need it to do --- which isn't much. LOLAn '04 Ranger is what I'll be trading
I share your pain.I hate the car-buying process. That's one reason I usually drive them until they're dead.
Mine is a 1999 with 197K miles on it. Still does what I need it to do --- which isn't much. LOLAn '04 Ranger is what I'll be trading
I'm 5'6", my wife is 5'. We gotta have something we can get into without a step ladder. Obviously head room isn't an issue.
Ah I was thinking the same thing, but Ford has plants all over the world. It is a trend when prices are down, Americans flock to the larger vehicles which they are doing now, but the herd will stampede if the gas prices spike. It has happened before, will happen again if gas goes high enough. .Seems like dangerous strategy. With things a little shaky in the Middle East, gas prices could spike at any time. If it were to, Ford would be left with no fuel efficient vehicles.
Could turn out bad for them.
I had one of those, a couple of El Camino's too. Now they have these huge 4 door pick ups with a smaller bed than the RancheroThere is still hope for the Ranchero, right?
Yeah, I don't get that at all. Maybe I'm just too out of touch, but what's the point of a truck with a bed smaller than some wading pools? I'm stuck in the era when trucks were working vehicles, and what the paint looked like after 6 months of use wasn't a priority.I had one of those, a couple of El Camino's too. Now they have these huge 4 door pick ups with a smaller bed than the Ranchero
My parents got a Honda SUV about a year ago. The back end may measure out to a lot of cubic feet, but the problem is it's vertical. Their Grand Marquis had a conventional trunk. It may have had fewer total cu.ft, but you could sure spread out a lot more groceries and stuff without having to stack them on top of one another.http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/26/news/companies/ford-suv-shift/index.html
No where is "comfort for my butt" found in the reasons for SUVs. LOL
All they talk about is ride height and space. I'm old --- I want comfort.
A couple of years before he passed, my husband wanted a full size pickup with an 8 foot bed. Didn't want 4 doors, just one that had an extended cab.Yeah, I don't get that at all. Maybe I'm just too out of touch, but what's the point of a truck with a bed smaller than some wading pools? I'm stuck in the era when trucks were working vehicles, and what the paint looked like after 6 months of use wasn't a priority.
And this where my wife is headed, she now wants to get a SUV, not a fan of this crossover , we still have a few more years on the current car to pay down first.I've driven a SUV for a year and about ready to get back into a car - if I can talk my wife into it.
That's why I wouldn't buy a little sports car. I had one in my younger days and I sure got tired of my butt dragging the ground. Plus,It is nice to sit in a vehicle instead of sitting DOWN in a vehicle.
it was (is) a pain to literally climb out of it.
I drove a Prius as a shuttle car. They are supposed to be one of the most trouble free cars made. Not only fairly hard to get out of, it was gutless on the highway and it darted about at highway speeds. some of this stuff is for really populated areas. I can't see total electrics with extension cords stretching across the sidewalks in the urban areas.That's why I wouldn't buy a little sports car. I had one in my younger days and I sure got tired of my butt dragging the ground. Plus,
it was a pain to literally climb out of it.
Not mine...I got an 8 ft bed that never has to be made.I had one of those, a couple of El Camino's too. Now they have these huge 4 door pick ups with a smaller bed than the Ranchero
Excuse me if I've have asked this before and forgotten the answer, but what exactly is a 'crossover'? What's being crossed?
You need a Cadillac. The SRX we have sits lower than most SUVs are rides like what you'd expect from Cadillac.http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/26/news/companies/ford-suv-shift/index.html
No where is "comfort for my butt" found in the reasons for SUVs. LOL
All they talk about is ride height and space. I'm old --- I want comfort.
Can't afford one.You need a Cadillac. The SRX we have sits lower than most SUVs are rides like what you'd expect from Cadillac.
Yeah, I don't get that at all. Maybe I'm just too out of touch, but what's the point of a truck with a bed smaller than some wading pools? I'm stuck in the era when trucks were working vehicles, and what the paint looked like after 6 months of use wasn't a priority.
You can get a nicely equipped Taurus for under 25k. Base models are going for 18k.This might be a great time to look at Ford sedans now.The only way to move them off the lot now is with heavy discounts with the news out.I might look at a Ford if the price is too good to pass up.
Can't afford one.
I drove a Prius as a shuttle car. They are supposed to be one of the most trouble free cars made. Not only fairly hard to get out of, it was gutless on the highway and it darted about at highway speeds. some of this stuff is for really populated areas. I can't see total electrics with extension cords stretching across the sidewalks in the urban areas.
LOL I've about decided that my Town Car will have to pried out of my cold, dead hands.I'd love my Town Car too much to trade it in!
I agree, They will have lost brand loyalty when the next gas crunch comes and people start looking for a car.Seems like dangerous strategy. With things a little shaky in the Middle East, gas prices could spike at any time. If it were to, Ford would be left with no fuel efficient vehicles.
Could turn out bad for them.
Mustang HybridI agree, They will have lost brand loyalty when the next gas crunch comes and people start looking for a car.
narrow market IMOMustang Hybrid