K
Extra points are awarded to those that finish in the top 10 of a given stage. I believe Truex pitted right before the end of stage 1 and 2, while Chase stayed out and finished in the top 10 each time to earn those extra points.Hi,
Can some explain the points column in the attached Picture.. for example how did Chase Elliott who finished 4th get 49 points and Martin Truex, Jr who won the race get 40
Thanks,
Kevin
That makes sense.
Hi,
Can some explain the points column in the attached Picture.. for example how did Chase Elliott who finished 4th get 49 points and Martin Truex, Jr who won the race get 40
Thanks,
Kevin
I recall this type of thing happening under other points systems too. A driver could score more points than the winner for getting more bonus points such as leading the most laps. I don't recall all of the types of bonus points available under the different systems; I just check the standings - I'm still getting used to the current point spread between drivers to determine how close they are.
I'm actually kind of OK with a lower finishing driver getting more points than the winner if they ran well all day. If a driver dominates a whole race then has an 89 cent part break with 10 laps to go, it's not as devastating as it used to be.In the 'classic' version of the Latford system, used from 1975-2003, it was possible for the second place driver to score the same number of points as the winner by leading the most laps. The winner received 175 points, second got 170, and there were 5 bonus points for leading a lap and 5 for leading the most laps. Both could score 180 total.
This was no longer possible in 2004-2006 when the winner received 180, and 2007-2010 when the winner received 185.
Before stage points, the 43-1 / 40-1 scales didn't allow anyone else to score as many or more points than the winner.
It is now technically possible for the 15th place driver to score more points than the race winner. While they have made winning more important in other ways, IMO that is an unprecedented clusterf**k.
And a 50 point bonus if you win a race, done....Give me the Latford system and a season-long battle between Harvick, Busch, and Truex.
It’d be epic. A 3 man title fight where each guy is a threat to win each and every week. What an organic and real way to decide a titleGive me the Latford system and a season-long battle between Harvick, Busch, and Truex.
I'm actually kind of OK with a lower finishing driver getting more points than the winner if they ran well all day. If a driver dominates a whole race then has an 89 cent part break with 10 laps to go, it's not as devastating as it used to be.
I'm actually kind of OK with a lower finishing driver getting more points than the winner if they ran well all day. If a driver dominates a whole race then has an 89 cent part break with 10 laps to go, it's not as devastating as it used to be.
No longer is second place necessarily first loser.The phrase "winning is everything" has no place in NASCAR anymore.
In NASCAR mathematics, the 11th placed car can come home with more points than the race winner!No longer is second place necessarily first loser.
If you want points for a team that ran well all day but didn't win, bring back the Latford 5-point bonus for leading the most laps.