Great summary. I hope BMS made bankThis race was old school where teams ran completely different setups from car to car. Spring, shock,sway bar combinations came back in to play because mechanical grip was king. Old school slang, "buzzing the tires" "pushing like a dump truck" "forward bite" were common. Bias ply tires, saving the right rear. This what its all about, this is racing in its purest form. God I love it. Great job BMS track crew, great job NASCAR, great job Fox your coverage was fun, great job to every single team that ran that race. A rock solid 10.
This race was old school where teams ran completely different setups from car to car. Spring, shock,sway bar combinations came back in to play because mechanical grip was king. Old school slang, "buzzing the tires" "pushing like a dump truck" "forward bite" were common. Bias ply tires, saving the right rear. This what its all about, this is racing in its purest form. God I love it. Great job BMS track crew, great job NASCAR, great job Fox your coverage was fun, great job to every single team that ran that race. A rock solid 10.
Yep I can't disagree with anyone rating this a 10 and I've said that about maybe 10 races in the 30 years I've been watching the sport. This was a fantastic race and I'm honestly stumped at so many low ratingsThis post is awesome @Spotter22. I respect your opinion. Thank you for helping me to understand what I saw a whole bunch more. Good stuff. The content I come here for as they say....
I think if you look at was on the track, it looked a lot like a pavement race IMO. However, when you look at the nuances of this type of racing as @Spotter22 pointed out, then it becomes special. I am a nuance guy. Anytime we can talk about something other than what a driver had for breakfast (i.e. shocks, springs, set ups), I am a fan.Yep I can't disagree with anyone rating this a 10 and I've said that about maybe 10 races in the 30 years I've been watching the sport. This was a fantastic race and I'm honestly stumped at so many low ratings
It looked like a combo of 90's Bristol, 2000's Darlington, and the Eldora truck races. Can't go wrong with any of thoseI think if you look at was on the track, it looked a lot like a pavement race IMO. However, when you look at the nuances of this type of racing as @Spotter22 pointed out, then it becomes special. I am a nuance guy. Anytime we can talk about something other than what a driver had for breakfast (i.e. shocks, springs, set ups), I am a fan.
That's why I gave it the rating I did, a shorter pavement race with a lot of extra logistical overhead.I think if you look at was on the track, it looked a lot like a pavement race IMO. However, when you look at the nuances of this type of racing as @Spotter22 pointed out, then it becomes special. I am a nuance guy. Anytime we can talk about something other than what a driver had for breakfast (i.e. shocks, springs, set ups), I am a fan.
I was traveling that day or I would have helped you out. No you cant see the shocks or springs or sway bar sizes but you can listen to the drivers, if you have that access ,discussing not enough forward bite and buzzing the right rear etc...and the CC discussing what changes they could make, how the driver could adjust his line and soft peddle during the first part of the run. I'm sure the setups were much more custom from car to car due to the feel the driver was looking for, we all know aero grip is heavily regulated on what changes you could make and really wasnt a concern but Mechanical grip changes are almost endless. In the end its not so much if you know what changes the CC made did to the car as it is understanding that option was there when usually it wouldnt be. I wouldnt be surprised if they were changing shocks during the breaks. Anyway just my 2 cents and you cant even get a piece of gum with it.That's why I gave it the rating I did, a shorter pavement race with a lot of extra logistical overhead.
It may have been chockful of subtleties and nuances, but learning about them on Monday didn't do me any any good on Sunday. I asked in the pre-race what to look for. I got one response, for which I was grateful, but it wasn't very informative. Even if I'd known what to look for, I couldn't see it through the dust anyway. I can't see springs, shocks, etc. and I don't know how to tell what changes are the results of adjusting each of them.
The hell?5 -
Unique and different for sure, but, would not ever pay to see it live.
I wouldn't either, when I could spend my money on races at other tracks. Races where I could see what's going on, where there are more green flag laps and chances for green flag pit stops, where I won't get dirt in my sandwich. I don't mind getting dirty when I'm participating in an activity; I'm not paying to get dirty as a spectator, with a few hours drive home in that condition.The hell?
To each his own but Im up to try anything different and try to find the joy in it.I wouldn't either, when I could spend my money on races at other tracks. Races where I could see what's going on, where there are more green flag laps and chances for green flag pit stops, where I won't get dirt in my sandwich. I don't mind getting dirty when I'm participating in an activity; I'm not paying to get dirty as a spectator, with a few hours drive home in that condition.
This post is NOT a critique of the racing, just an explanation of why I agree with @sdj about not paying to see it.
There are plenty of activities I enjoy watching on the tube that I wouldn’t attend. I went to a golf tournament once but I’m not likely to do it again; I’m too short to see.To each his own but Im up to try anything different and try to find the joy in it.