M
MOEJOE
Guest
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!Stop your complaining or I'm turning this thread around!
Good stuff DP!
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!Stop your complaining or I'm turning this thread around!
Johnson had five wins the same year, Newmann got rookie of the year. I bet he feels wierd about that now.
I stand corrected. Jimmie has five titles. This I know is trueIn 2003, Newman had 8 wins, but was in his second year by then. In his rookie year (2002), newman had 6 poles and a win. Johnson had 4P and 3 wins.
I stand corrected. Jimmie has five titles. This I know is true
So I've been secretly hating Newman this whole time? Man. I hope he forgives me for the metal in his oil filter.Nice recovery. I think Matt beat JJ for rookie of the year.
Wait, y'all bitched and whined and moaned when they changed it from its original concept of pole winners, and now you're bitching whining and moaning because they changed it back to its original state?
Some people will bitch and whine about anything.
Irony at it's best.Ya think?
Yet not since the "Rocket Man" didn't win one this year.
Some people will bitch and whine about anything.
We should start a poll to see who the members here think does the most bitching and whining about anything/everything. What do you think, Andy? I know I'm all for it.
It was a dead heat so I'll bet the panel that voted for RN over JJ feels stupid if its ever brought up.Johnson had five wins the same year, Newmann got rookie of the year. I bet he feels wierd about that now.
Yet not since the "Rocket Man" didn't win one this year.
Would you please quit spoiling a good off season argument with such nonsense as facts.I don't know if you guys are serious or not with the whole Newman/Johnson ROTY debate but the numbers CLEARLY give the edge to Newman by a good margin. We probably all understand that it's not about what the rookie will do in the future.
Would you please quit spoiling a good off season argument with such nonsense as facts.
Sure, no problem. Party on
Please explain how a race that rewards pole winners and past winners of the race is screwed up?Screwed up, but then again it's na$car.
Keselowski must be the most victimized driver in the history of the world and it wont surpise me if someone figures out a way to blame it all on Edwards
Bad Brad will get his 15 minutes (er, 12 months) of fame and because of edwards he will fade into obscurity.Keselowski must be the most victimized driver in the history of the world and it wont surpise me if someone figures out a way to blame it all on Edwards
Yep, win a pole you race in the shootout, .
And which pole and which shootout was I talking about here Mr. Bumper, Hmmm?Not for the past 3 years you didn't.
Damn, I sounded likeMoe Joe.And which pole and which shootout was I talking about here Mr. Bumper, Hmmm?
Damn, I sounded likeMoe Joe.
And which pole and which shootout was I talking about here Mr. Bumper, Hmmm?
Agreed.For me, if you didn't win a pole in '12, or you're not a past winner, you don't get in. Simple.
By past winner they mean the past winner of the Shootout, not any other race. They wouldn't be talking about anyone that won a race during the 2012 season. You might be getting the Shootout and All-Star race qualifications confused.Agreed.
But, TRL, next year, as you know is 2013 (or so we hope).
A past winner would be considered someone who won in 2012.
I say, let the previous Cup champ in at the very least, right?
Right....Rules are really simple, even "most" people here can understand themYou have to win a pole or be a past champion of the race to get in the race, thats pretty much cut & dry & the drivers all know it. I'm sure BK's not gonna let this damper his title defense not to mention Budweiser doesn't give a sh!t, they're probably happy their number rival won't be in their sponsored event...