Lap by lap comparison chart @ racing-reference.info

dpkimmel2001

dpkimmel2001

Team Owner
Joined
Apr 1, 2009
Messages
36,139
Points
1,033
Location
Western PA
Anyone know where to find this info on racing-reference.info? I believe it used to be under the Loop Data result section of the race but I no longer see it. Maybe I'm having a brain-fart but if someone knows, can you post the link? Thanks.
 
I noticed on the new an unimproved MRN web site that they no longer have YTD driver ratings - at least, not that I could find. Track-by-track driver ratings, but nothing for the year, and that big PDF full of stats like fastest on restarts, fastest late in a run, etc. seems to be gone as well.

Makes no sense to me why when other sports start to embrace analytics NASCAR can't even tell you who's quickest for two laps after a restart anymore.
 
One reason I love Indycar's lap chart and full-race section time data. You can make full race length time charts.
 
I use a few of Racing Reference's historic driver performance data (average finish at a track, DNFs, Top 10s) for picking my fantasy team. I don't know what I'd do with numbers like 'Fastest for three laps after a stage caution on concrete tracks in the second half of the season'. I guess I'm not particularly stat oriented.
 
Charlie Spencer said:
I use a few of Racing Reference's historic driver performance data (average finish at a track, DNFs, Top 10s) for picking my fantasy team. I don't know what I'd do with numbers like 'Fastest for three laps after a stage caution on concrete tracks in the second half of the season'. I guess I'm not particularly stat oriented.
Click to expand...
Is there a reason to not publish them? Maybe you don't like to, but plenty of people would like to be able to do a data dump and do various analyses. Seen it plenty of times with the huge Alkamel timing databases WEC and IMSA put out. Maybe NASCAR thinks us fans are just too dumb to grasp anything beyond how many Top 10s a guy has.
 
FLRacingFan said:
Is there a reason to not publish them?
Click to expand...
Well, someone has to accumulate them and format them for publication. Maybe the sites that were doing it weren't getting enough hits to make it worth even that minimal, automate-able effort.
FLRacingFan said:
Maybe you don't like to, but plenty of people would like to be able to do a data dump and do various analyses. Seen it plenty of times with the huge Alkamel timing databases WEC and IMSA put out.
Click to expand...
It's not a question of my not liking to. It's more like it's something that hadn't occurred to me, and I'm trying to understand it.

Toss up a link to the databases you mentioned. It might be that taking a look at them will enlighten me.
 
Charlie Spencer said:
Well, someone has to accumulate them and format them for publication. Maybe the sites that were doing it weren't getting enough hits to make it worth even that minimal, automate-able effort.

It's not a question of my not liking to. It's more like it's something that hadn't occurred to me, and I'm trying to understand it.

Toss up a link to the databases you mentioned. It might be that taking a look at them will enlighten me.
Click to expand...
Headquarter'd in the same damn building: http://results.imsa.com/

http://fiawec.alkamelsystems.com/
 
The lap by lap info should be super simple to obtain and post. Nascar keeps a record of every car's positions on every lap. Racing-reference has the loop data, which to me would be more complicated than having the simpler lap to lap data. Doesn't make any sense.
 
StandOnIt said:
The lap by lap info should be super simple to obtain and post. Nascar keeps a record of every car's positions on every lap. Racing-reference has the loop data, which to me would be more complicated than having the simpler lap to lap data. Doesn't make any sense.
Click to expand...

NASCAR owns Racing-Reference.
 
Huh. Right down there at the bottom.

"Copyright © 2017 NASCAR Digital Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Racing-reference.info is part of the NASCAR Digital Media Network."
 
NASCAR purchased the site in recent years. I am not sure which specific year, but as late as 2015 it was still owned by its founder, Alan Boodman.
 
FLRacingFan said:
I noticed on the new an unimproved MRN web site that they no longer have YTD driver ratings - at least, not that I could find. Track-by-track driver ratings, but nothing for the year, and that big PDF full of stats like fastest on restarts, fastest late in a run, etc. seems to be gone as well.

Makes no sense to me why when other sports start to embrace analytics NASCAR can't even tell you who's quickest for two laps after a restart anymore.
Click to expand...

If you want YTD driver ratings, I can start posting them each week. Last year, I copied the Loop Data from every race since its inception in 2005 into a single spreadsheet. I can now create pivot tables for any stat for a specific year, driver, track, track type, etc..

I just wish there was an efficient way of copying/pasting to the forum. Going thru a service like photobucket is time-consuming. I guess I could tweet LoopData stats and then embed them. I dunno. I used #LoopData to tweet out a couple charts last year.


Race 2 of 36:

Year 2018
Average of DRIVER RATING Race
Rank Driver 01. Daytona 02. Atlanta Grand Total
1 Kevin Harvick 83.0 146.1 114.6
2 Ryan Blaney 132.6 80.2 106.4
3 Kurt Busch 93.5 111.5 102.5
4 Denny Hamlin 100.8 101.2 101.0
5 Joey Logano 105.2 94.2 99.7
6 Brad Keselowski 66.3 122.7 94.5
7 Martin Truex, Jr. 85.3 103.2 94.3
8 Ryan Newman 90.9 93.1 92.0
9 Clint Bowyer 68.3 109.7 89.0
10 Aric Almirola 88.9 82.6 85.8
11 Alex Bowman 96.8 68.0 82.4
12 Ricky Stenhouse, Jr. 90.1 73.5 81.8
13 Paul Menard 91.0 69.3 80.2
14 Kyle Busch 49.2 110.0 79.6
15 Austin Dillon 84.8 69.2 77.0
16 Kyle Larson 59.0 93.0 76.0
17 Erik Jones 76.4 72.8 74.6
18 Daniel Suarez 60.9 84.9 72.9
19 Darrell Wallace, Jr. 101.2 44.3 72.8
20 Chase Elliott 63.7 78.9 71.3
21 Trevor Bayne 85.2 43.8 64.5
22 Michael McDowell 81.4 45.3 63.4
23 A.J. Allmendinger 81.3 44.5 62.9
24 Chris Buescher 73.3 50.4 61.9
25 Jamie McMurray 49.0 63.6 56.3
26 Brendan Gaughan 56.1 56.1
27 William Byron 61.0 51.0 56.0
28 David Ragan 67.2 41.8 54.5
29 Jimmie Johnson 52.7 54.7 53.7
30 Justin Marks 52.3 52.3
31 David Gilliland 50.2 50.2
32 Kasey Kahne 35.0 58.5 46.8
33 Ty Dillon 44.5 47.6 46.1
34 Matt DiBenedetto 54.9 32.7 43.8
35 Danica Patrick 40.0 40.0
36 Mark Thompson 39.7 39.7
37 D.J. Kennington 39.5 39.5
38 Jeffrey Earnhardt 50.4 26.1 38.3
39 Cole Whitt 36.5 36.5
40 Gray Gaulding 45.3 23.3 34.3
41 Ross Chastain 32.7 32.7
42 Harrison Rhodes 28.3 28.3
43 Corey LaJoie 23.8 23.8
 
FLRacingFan said:
Is there a reason to not publish them? Maybe you don't like to, but plenty of people would like to be able to do a data dump and do various analyses. Seen it plenty of times with the huge Alkamel timing databases WEC and IMSA put out. Maybe NASCAR thinks us fans are just too dumb to grasp anything beyond how many Top 10s a guy has.
Click to expand...

According to NASCAR the only questions we should be asking are: Is Dale Jr. done go run good this week? Yes/No, Is it time to start thinking about Jardiance? Yes/Yes.
 
Charlie Spencer said:
I'll bite; what do you do with them?
Click to expand...

Sorry, this is from a week ago.

You can map an entire race in a spreadsheet and chart it. Oval races due to having so many laps it's just a ton of data. It's good for the Lights and other races, you can view real-time driver performance taking into account items like who got stuck behind what car since that's not always a driver's fault. Also becomes easier to spot who hides behind wave arounds and other gimmicks to stay close to the leader. I'll see if I could put up a couple pictures of what I'm talking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom