Nationwide Series on SPEED

I just go off of your posts. I know your type well. Always complaining, overly dramatic, always the victim, overly sensitive, narcissistic, filled with jealousy and resentment, anger management issues, a propensity for burning bridges...etc.

That sums me up :sarcasm:
 
I just saw Dilner interview Johanna. She's not all that pretty but has a certain "girl next door" appeal. I hope she does well tomorrow. It's cool that Danica's presence is leading to more exposure for Johanna.
 
I just saw Donner interview Johanna. She has a certain "girl next door" appeal. I hope she does well tomorrow. It's cool that Danica's presence is leading to more exposure for Johanna.

If Danica wasn't racing tomorrow, Johanna would be getting tons of coverage. Her practice runs were impressive, and she wasn't in a NASCAR superteam car either.
 
Why do you insist on stating your opinions as fact?:rolleyes:

Because it is a fact. Johanna got a fair amount of coverage in ARCA. The media can ignore her now, but eventually, when she shows she can get the job done, the media won't be able to ignore it. And, Bob Dillner works at SPEED. If there's one guy who won't put up with high quality short track drivers being ignored, it's Dillner.
 
Because it is a fact. Johanna got a fair amount of coverage in ARCA. The media can ignore her now, but eventually, when she shows she can get the job done, the media won't be able to ignore it. And, Bob Dillner works at SPEED. If there's one guy who won't put up with high quality short track drivers being ignored, it's Dillner.

She's sucked up until now. She wrecked everything she drove when I watched 3 or 4 times
 
Because it is a fact. Johanna got a fair amount of coverage in ARCA. The media can ignore her now, but eventually, when she shows she can get the job done, the media won't be able to ignore it. And, Bob Dillner works at SPEED. If there's one guy who won't put up with high quality short track drivers being ignored, it's Dillner.
Dude, until something actually happens, it's not a fact. A statement containing "if A was this then, then B would've been this," will never be a fact, no matter how much you'd like it to be.

Besides, if Danica wasn't driving, and they gave her too much coverage, you'd still complain. Now that's a fact (at least according to your definition of the word)
 
Back
Top Bottom