- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 10,592
- Points
- 1,033
Rate the race on a scale of 1 to 10.
Rate The race - Bristol
- Thread starter muggle not
- Start date
mike honcho
Knuckleheads
3
The only reason I watched was nothing else on TV and to damn cold to go outside.
The only reason I watched was nothing else on TV and to damn cold to go outside.
7 for the race
10+ for the winner!!!
10+ for the winner!!!
buckaroo
Here kitty, kitty, kitty
At times this race was a good solid 8 or 9 and then at other times, it was terrible. Overall, I'll go ahead and give it an 8.
racer8
Team Owner
Always exciting at Bristol, 8
P
PettyBlue
Guest
8 here, too.
I'll go an 8, too.
Good side-by-side racing.
Good side-by-side racing.
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 10,592
- Points
- 1,033
I'll give it a 7.5. I can't quite go the 8 route.
HoneyBadger
Kelsey Mitchell fan account
From what I saw of the race, 7. But I spent most of the afternoon enjoying this absolutely perfect weather we are experiencing in Northern Maryland.
As far as Jimmie winning again, I'd rather watch a Hannah Montana marathon.
As far as Jimmie winning again, I'd rather watch a Hannah Montana marathon.
Magicmiler
Team Owner
I'll give the race an 8
JJ winning again..............
JJ winning again..............
Tennessee Racing
Formerly Stewart Fan
I'll go with a 6. Pretty dull race for the most part and the Nationwide race was better.
G
Gordon_Fan24
Guest
I don't know how it came across on TV, but it was actually a really decent race with lots of side by side racing. I will give it a 8 overall. I am sure that it didn't come across as good on TV with as much as Busch led. The experience of being at Bristol is just plain awsome!
P.S. ALOT of empty seats at Bristol this year. It was actually kinda sad.
P.S. ALOT of empty seats at Bristol this year. It was actually kinda sad.
MRM
Team Owner
I say a 7.
7
S
SlowNeasy
Guest
7 - agree the nationwide race was more exciting.
de7xwcc
Anarchist
well i was there also and compaired to past races at BMS i give it a solid.......
2
2
F
foehammer111
Guest
Overall I'd give it an 8.
Had some great 3-wide racing, and the TV coverage was pretty good too. I thought Fox did a good job of showing good battles through-out the field. It was a little slow in spots.
Had some great 3-wide racing, and the TV coverage was pretty good too. I thought Fox did a good job of showing good battles through-out the field. It was a little slow in spots.
Felt there were many good battles throughout the field. Give it a seven.
R
Racerx11
Guest
7.5
Thoughtit was a good race, didn't care for the ending though.
Thoughtit was a good race, didn't care for the ending though.
W
WNY24Fan
Guest
I'll give it a 7. I thought the Nationwide race was far better.
dpkimmel2001
Team Owner
Definitely an 8. Lot's of action and great side by side racing. Many people like the Bristol of old but I'll take the side by side racing any day of the reconfigured surface.
I agree. My row of about 18 seats only had 6 of us in it for the entire race. The way people were scattered throughout the seats it gave the appearance that more people were there than actually were. The 'head count' actually at the track had to be waaay down this year. It looked more like a Nationwide attendance type crowd than a Cup crowd.
I agree. My row of about 18 seats only had 6 of us in it for the entire race. The way people were scattered throughout the seats it gave the appearance that more people were there than actually were. The 'head count' actually at the track had to be waaay down this year. It looked more like a Nationwide attendance type crowd than a Cup crowd.
S
spok4
Guest
I was at the race
I will say a 9 overall
0 for winner
8 on pre-race events around the track
7 on crowd attendance
10 on crowd participation
10 for food at track
7 for price of food at track
I will say a 9 overall
0 for winner
8 on pre-race events around the track
7 on crowd attendance
10 on crowd participation
10 for food at track
7 for price of food at track
W
WULF
Guest
I saw the last 2min...based on that, how bout -2.