Robby Gordon penalized 100 points

FONTANA, Calif. -- A campaign is under way declaring Robby Gordon's innocence for what NASCAR said was an illegal part used on his car during Speedweeks. (read more)

Representatives from Robby Gordon Motorsports will canvas the Auto Club Speedway grandstands on Saturday gathering signatures for a petition demanding NASCAR reverse its "unfair" decision to dock Gordon 100 points. Crew chief Frank Kerr also was fined $100,000, suspended for the next six Sprint Cup Series events until April 9 and placed on probation until Dec. 31.
Gordon
Gordon

Along with the petition, "Rally for Robby" T-shirts are being made for Gordon fans to wear during this weekend's Cup events, said Sophia Lombardo, spokesperson for Gordon.

Also, Thomas Flocco, president and CEO of Beam Global Spirits & Wine Inc., Gordon's sponsor, has sent a letter addressed to NASCAR president Mike Helton, as well as other top officials, voicing the company's frustrations.

"Robby's team earned an honest 8th place finish in the Daytona 500 through tireless dedication, quality and character, not because of rule violations," the letter states. "As your own officials have stated, there appears to have been no intent to circumvent the rules in order to gain a competitive disadvantage. It amounts to an honest mistake that was corrected before the race.

"Your decision unfairly penalizes Robby, his sponsors and his fans. ... While we fully support the rules NASCAR has put in place to keep the playing field level, we ask that you closely review all the facts," the letter continued. "Please consider not just the letter of the law, but the spirit of the rules of competition."

Gordon on Thursday said that he would appeal the penalty levied against the No. 7 team by NASCAR. (read more)

"I hope that NASCAR can reconsider when they have all the facts," Gordon said in a statement released on his Web site. "In the meantime, we have no choice but to appeal this penalty. We started the season off on a high note with a top-10 finish at Daytona and we look forward to continuing that at California and Las Vegas."


Here is Jim Beam's letter e-mailed to Helton and other top officals at NASCAR

Feb. 22, 2008

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL:

Mr. Mike Helton
President, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing

Mr. Robin Pemberton
Vice President, Competition, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing

Mr. John Darby
Competition Director, Sprint Cup Series, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing


Dear Mike, Robin and John:

As a proud sponsor of Robby Gordon for the past four years, Jim Beam believes that the 100-point penalty handed down by NASCAR is excessive – we support his decision to appeal.

Robby’s team earned an honest 8th place finish in the Daytona 500 through tireless dedication, quality, and character – not because of rule violations. As your own officials have stated, there appears to have been no intent to circumvent the rules in order to gain a competitive advantage. It amounts to an honest mistake that was corrected before the race.

Your decision unfairly penalizes Robby, his sponsors and his fans. In fact, nearly 70 percent of racing fans on NASCAR.com are standing up for Robby and agree with our assessment. While we fully support the rules NASCAR has put in place to keep the playing field level, we ask that you closely review all the facts. Please consider not just the letter of the law, but the spirit of the rules of competition.

At Jim Beam, we believe in doing the right thing. Robby is a man of true character who has the stuff inside to compete at the highest level in racing. As the only driver/owner to finish in the top ten this past weekend, Robby is giving NASCAR fans something to talk about. When Robby succeeds, NASCAR also wins. Robby’s passion is contagious.

If you look at the facts, we think you will see not only our perspective, but that of the millions of NASCAR fans. We look forward to your decision.

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Flocco
 
Here is Jim Beam's letter e-mailed to Helton and other top officals at NASCAR

Feb. 22, 2008

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL:

Mr. Mike Helton
President, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing

Mr. Robin Pemberton
Vice President, Competition, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing

Mr. John Darby
Competition Director, Sprint Cup Series, National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing


Dear Mike, Robin and John:

As a proud sponsor of Robby Gordon for the past four years, Jim Beam believes that the 100-point penalty handed down by NASCAR is excessive – we support his decision to appeal.

Robby’s team earned an honest 8th place finish in the Daytona 500 through tireless dedication, quality, and character – not because of rule violations. As your own officials have stated, there appears to have been no intent to circumvent the rules in order to gain a competitive advantage. It amounts to an honest mistake that was corrected before the race.

Your decision unfairly penalizes Robby, his sponsors and his fans. In fact, nearly 70 percent of racing fans on NASCAR.com are standing up for Robby and agree with our assessment. While we fully support the rules NASCAR has put in place to keep the playing field level, we ask that you closely review all the facts. Please consider not just the letter of the law, but the spirit of the rules of competition.

At Jim Beam, we believe in doing the right thing. Robby is a man of true character who has the stuff inside to compete at the highest level in racing. As the only driver/owner to finish in the top ten this past weekend, Robby is giving NASCAR fans something to talk about. When Robby succeeds, NASCAR also wins. Robby’s passion is contagious.

If you look at the facts, we think you will see not only our perspective, but that of the millions of NASCAR fans. We look forward to your decision, with beer bottles ready for throwing.

Please note, that if we disagree with what is proclaimed in correctance, you can anticipate many Jim Bean Beer Bottles being thrown on track over the course of the California and Las Vegas races, as well as a Hummer H3 off road competition vehicle parked on top of Mr. Frances rental vehicle, courtesty Robby Gordon Motorsports.

Sincerely,

Thomas J. Flocco

Helped you out a bit there.
 
That sounded like a threat. lol

As I understand it, when appealing a penalty, isn't it out of NASCAR control? isn't it some committed that decides whether they want to overturned? :confused:
 
Lee Spencer-

FONTANA, Calif. - Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger was in the house for pole day at the newly renamed Auto Club Speedway of Southern California on Friday and met with the seven Golden State natives currently driving in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series.

That would have been the perfect time for the Robby Gordon, who hails from nearby Bellflower, Calif., to ask the Governor for a pardon or perhaps clemency from the latest penalty delivered by NASCAR on Wednesday.

Gordon was docked 100 points for an unapproved front bumper cover on the No. 7 Dodge during the initial inspection for the Daytona 500. Gordon's crew chief Frank Kerr received an additional fine of $100,000, was suspended for six races and will remain under probation for the rest of the season. Until the appeal is heard, Kerr will be allowed to remain at the racetrack. However, the deduction on points stays.

"We're going to jail for a crime we didn't commit," Gordon said on Friday. "It's almost like putting yourself in the position where someone steals your car and robs a bank, and because it was your car, you're going to jail. I don't think this is a fair penalty, and obviously, we'll have to appeal it.

"My sponsors, Jim Beam, and everybody else are behind us as a race team. They feel that we have not done anything wrong, and they're confident that NASCAR will make the right decision once they hear the whole appeal process."

If there was ever a whipping boy in NASCAR, it appears to be Robby Gordon. The sanctioning body has clashed with the journeyman racer time and again.

Gordon first came under NASCAR's scrutiny when he and Jeff Gordon tangled at New Hampshire International Speedway in the postponed race following Sept. 11 in 2001. Robby Gordon would go on to win his first Cup race that day, but it came at the expense of a black flag penalty to Jeff Gordon, the driver who would be crowned series champion just a week later — a decision that did not sit well with the governing body.

Things got more heated between NASCAR and Robby Gordon once he left Richard Childress Racing and formed his own organization, Robby Gordon Motorsports, following the 2004 season:

# In 2005, Gordon was fined $50,000 and 50 points for using an expletive while being interviewed on camera following an altercation with Michael Waltrip at NHIS.

# In 2006, NASCAR fined Gordon $15,000 and docked him 50 points for allegedly throwing debris on the track to trigger a caution at Atlanta Motor Speedway.

# In 2007, Gordon was scrutinized for carrying the Motorola brand on his No. 7 machine at Atlanta. NASCAR, which had a suit filed against the sanctioning body one day earlier from AT&T over sponsoring Jeff Burton's No. 31 car, claimed Motorola was a direct conflict with Nextel/Sprint's non-compete clause. Gordon claimed the Motorola deal was for a category outside of handset phones and NASCAR retreated from that battle.

# Just a few weeks after Atlanta, Gordon got suspended for a race after he failed to obey NASCAR officials. The incident which led to his suspension began when Gordon took the lead of the NAPA 200 race in Montreal just a few laps before the finish as cars wrecked behind him. Upon slowing for the caution, Marcos Ambrose spun Gordon out of the lead, but NASCAR did not see it that way, claiming that Gordon did not maintain a cautious pace and instructed him to line up 13th for the restart. He refused, raced to the front and NASCAR black-flagged the No. 55 even though Gordon would continue and acted like he won the race.

That was the last feud between the two until Daytona this season.

The sanctioning body made it clear last spring that any team found tampering with the Car of Tomorrow faced a minimum fine consistent with the penalties levied on Robby Gordon Motorsports.

However, the competition department should have considered the act of intent before issuing such a severe punishment, like they did during 2007 Speedweeks when they discovered that Jeff Gordon's shock mounts were improperly installed after qualifying for the Daytona 500. After deeming the move was not deliberate, the No. 24 had to start his qualifying race from the back of the field instead of face a fine or a loss of points.

A similar penalty should have been issued to RGM.

For Gordon, coming off a $4 million loss from the Dakar Rally's earlier cancellation, a hit of this magnitude will be substantial. Furthermore, the blow of dropping from ninth to 41st in the owner points standings is big, as there are just four races remaining before this season's points help lock the top 35 teams into each race.

The Daytona infraction came just a week from the time Gordon announced he was switching manufacturers from Ford to Dodge. A clerical error resulted in Gordon's team being issued the wrong bumper cover from Gillett Evernham Motorsports, RGMs new technical partner. The bumper has been submitted to NASCAR but had not been approved entering Speedweeks.

This was not a case of circumventing the rules. This was not a case of the No. 7 team attempting to gain an unfair advantage. It was simply a mistake. How in the world does an honest slip-up constitute "actions detrimental to stock car racing"? As Gordon so aptly points out, "this wasn't similar to Michael Waltrip Racing blatantly cheating at Daytona last year". This wasn't an engine or a fuel issue — an offense considered by officials as treading on holy ground.

Gordon is absolutely right to appeal.

"That's part of the process," said NASCAR VP of corporate communications Jim Hunter.

Sprint Cup director John Darby said that NASCAR hasn't tested the new Charger nose to determine whether Gordon would have gained an aerodynamic advantage. Regardless, he believes the penalty was consistent with the new car.

"We don't look at intent," Darby said. "We only look at rulebooks."

It's easy go by the book when the book has a catch-all rule like 12.4. You can read it here, but what it really says is "We can do whatever we want, to whomever we want, whenever we want."

It shouldn't be that way.

NASCAR, it's time to loosen up and not punish Robby Gordon for this infraction. This latest penalty against Gordon looks to be personal as the punishment does not fit the crime.

This isn't about Robby Gordon anymore. The fans deserve a consistent application of the rules for all drivers, not just the top stars.




-----

So Darby said that they dont look for intent, only at the rulebook. Yet the considered intent for Jeff Gordon at Daytona last year. Lying sack of poop. Favoritism will kill Nascar.
 
At the end of 2007, NASCAR made it very clear once the 2008 season began, there would be "zero" tolerance for advantage infractions and this includes violations discovered during inspection whether felt to be intentional or not.

Jim Beam has a financial stake in stepping forward and it is time for Dodge and GEM to follow suit, suck up some of the flack and show solidarity as Robbie Gordon is proclaiming his innocence re: infraction being the result of an incorrect part shipped by Dodge/GEM.
Unless as pointed out by BP, Robbie is shading the truth and that is the reason GEM is not in a hurry to 'fess up. Maybe Dodge/GEM has nothing to 'fess up.
Has anything been offered by Dodge/GEM in defense of Robbie Gordon ??

Hopefully Robbie will receive a reduction in penalties more in line with those assessed HMS and Dale, Junior. :)
 
ARS has this-

Robby Gordon says the future of his Sprint Cup organization could be in jeopardy if the penalties NASCAR levied after the Daytona 500 stand up under appeal.

Gordon was fined 100 driver and 100 owner points for having an unapproved nose cover on his Dodge Charger. Crew chief Frank Kerr was fined $100,000 and suspended for six races.




The penalties have been placed on hold until the National Stock Car Commission hears the appeal, which means Gordon remains ninth in points after his eighth-place finish at Daytona and Kerr will remain on his pit box.

Had Gordon not appealed he would be 41st in points heading into Sunday’s race at California Speedway. If he couldn’t work his way back into the top 35 over the next four races — the first five races are set on last year’s points — he would be in a position of having to qualify for races.

“A hundred could be life-threatening to our team,” Gordon said before Friday’s first practice. “If this sticks I don’t know what our plan will be. I think [IRL and CART are] back together, and I think I can drive one of those cars.”
 
At the end of 2007, NASCAR made it very clear once the 2008 season began, there would be "zero" tolerance for advantage infractions and this includes violations discovered during inspection whether felt to be intentional or not.

Jim Beam has a financial stake in stepping forward and it is time for Dodge and GEM to follow suit, suck up some of the flack and show solidarity as Robbie Gordon is proclaiming his innocence re: infraction being the result of an incorrect part shipped by Dodge/GEM.
Unless as pointed out by BP, Robbie is shading the truth and that is the reason GEM is not in a hurry to 'fess up. Maybe Dodge/GEM has nothing to 'fess up.
Has anything been offered by Dodge/GEM in defense of Robbie Gordon ??

Hopefully Robbie will receive a reduction in penalties more in line with those assessed HMS and Dale, Junior. :)

Darby said the nose difference would not have been a competitive advantage. In fact, the nose has been approved by Nascar. See the other thread. They are just outright screwing Robby.
 
GEM Is doing absolutely nothing to stick up for Robby.

Talk about on your own..
 
GEM Is doing absolutely nothing to stick up for Robby.

Talk about on your own..

Wrong there buddy.


Ray Evernham, the minority owner of Gillett Evernham Motorsports that supplies technical support to Gordon's team, said the penalty is wrong.

"It's dead wrong," he said. "To me that makes zero sense. To penalize the team for a mistake the buyer made ... It's something that needs to be worked out between Dodge and NASCAR."

The part in question was built by the company Five Star, which produces the nose and other parts for all manufacturers. The nose then was shipped to EPP, which sent it out to Robby Gordon Motorsports.

"And Dodge tells us it's OK to distribute these parts," Evernham said. "From my understanding, the paperwork came from Dodge saying this nose was approved and it was given to Robby."

A top Dodge official said at least 12 of the noses were built and at least half were sent out to teams. Evernham said at least one car in the GEM inventory was found with the unapproved nose.

Robbie Loomis, the vice president of racing operations at Petty Enterprises, said his organization received two of the unapproved parts for observation until the part gets NASCAR approval. He added that they were cut in half to make sure they didn't get on any cars.

"In Robby's situation, in fairness to him, he just did a deal to become a Dodge two weeks before," Loomis said. "It was just a communication breakdown. There are so many pieces to the car, it's easy for that stuff to happen."

Kerr said the nose fit NASCAR's template and that it simply was a "little character line on the grill work" where the nose and headlight stickers go that were out of place.
 
Still that's not doing much..he just put his two cents in it. Big deal.
 
Darby said the nose difference would not have been a competitive advantage. In fact, the nose has been approved by Nascar. See the other thread. They are just outright screwing Robby.


Thanks for posting the reply. I had not seen that response from Ray Evernham and it certainly puts Robbie on more solid footing for his appeal.

With this information, it should bring a reversal of all penalties providing all evidence presented is factual.
 
Back
Top Bottom