RTA exploring exhibition races

AndyMarquisLive

I love short track racing (Taylor's Version)
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
85,286
Points
1,033
Location
A short track somewhere
😳😳😳

The Race Team Alliance is deepening its relationship with Wasserman to have the sports marketing agency look into the possibility of holding exhibition races, a potentially stunning development that suggests that NASCAR's biggest teams could organize their own events in the offseason.

Wasserman Managing Dir of U.S. Will Pleasants confirmed to SBJ on Tuesday that the agency has "been hired to explore exhibition race opportunities, both domestically and internationally, via a (request-for-information proposal) -- very exploratory."

The RTA is a coalition of NASCAR teams who come together to meet and address issues and opportunities in the sport. Every team that owns one of the sport's 36 charters are now RTA members. Wasserman was already working with the RTA to help the coalition understand its media value heading into NASCAR's upcoming rights cycle, for which formal negotiations will start in early 2023. The exhibition exploration is a new, incremental addition to the deal for Wasserman.

 
So these not making enough money car owners are thinking about building different non Nascar cars for exhibition races. I wonder how many are in agreement with doing something like that?

NASCAR's teams have certain rules they have to abide by as part of the charter agreement with the sanctioning body, and those include not starting competing racing series. That agreement runs through 2024. However, it appears that teams feel they have the legal standing to do some form of exhibition races, as long as they compete in non-NASCAR race cars and branded apparel.
 
“While the exact implications of the RTA exploring this via Wasserman are unclear, it does come amid a simmering dispute between NASCAR and its teams over the proposed share of revenue to go to teams under the new media rights deal that will start in 2025. It also comes amid the festering dispute between the PGA Tour and LIV Golf, a situation that has been closely watched across sports after LIV started its breakaway property and heaped pressure on the PGA Tour to make seismic changes to its business as players sought more money.”
 
I know on Jeff Glucks podcast Jordan Bianchi said manufacturers told him they will not support their teams going to race another series so hopefully we aren't getting a split, but it will be interesting to see NASCARs response when they have said the same things about international
 
I'm confused how they think doing this will make them profitable? The amount of money they pull in running the cup series is crazy compared to any other form of racing outside of F1. If you can't make a profit running a cup car you need to look at your spending. Like Marcus Smith says its easy to demand more money but its even easier to say stop spending 20 million a year building race cars.

Where do they plan on running these things that will pull any kind of attendance to have significant pay outs. The only ones that I think would go for it from a TV side would be cbs and ESPN. I can see Nascar going to fox and nbc and saying if you carry these races you wouldn't get our tv contract in the new deal. Talk about a negotiation tactic. There likely is already wording in the current TV deal to this extent that they're not allowed to cover something like this.
 
I guess the next question I have is if they do go ahead with this who is going to run this series? My first thoughts are Tony Stewart or The Captain, but I think both of those guys have enough on their plates already. Justin Marks? No offense to RC but I think that's beyond him. Maybe Jeff Gordon?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
 
I'm confused how they think doing this will make them profitable? The amount of money they pull in running the cup series is crazy compared to any other form of racing outside of F1. If you can't make a profit running a cup car you need to look at your spending. Like Marcus Smith says its easy to demand more money but its even easier to say stop spending 20 million a year building race cars.

Where do they plan on running these things that will pull any kind of attendance to have significant pay outs. The only ones that I think would go for it from a TV side would be cbs and ESPN. I can see Nascar going to fox and nbc and saying if you carry these races you wouldn't get our tv contract in the new deal. Talk about a negotiation tactic. There likely is already wording in the current TV deal to this extent that they're not allowed to cover something like this.
I would think Roger Penske et al have taken all of that into consideration. The RTA membership is filled with some pretty smart cookies.

I guess the next question I have is if they do go ahead with this who is going to run this series? My first thoughts are Tony Stewart or The Captain, but I think both of those guys have enough on their plates already. Justin Marks? No offense to RC but I think that's beyond him. Maybe Jeff Gordon?

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
A successful entertainment industry executive?

Assuming it gets that far.
 
Where do they plan on running these things that will pull any kind of attendance to have significant pay outs. The only ones that I think would go for it from a TV side would be cbs and ESPN. I can see Nascar going to fox and nbc and saying if you carry these races you wouldn't get our tv contract in the new deal. Talk about a negotiation tactic. There likely is already wording in the current TV deal to this extent that they're not allowed to cover something like this.

North Wilkesboro Speedway drew 17,000 for a CARS Tour race on a Wednesday night.

Southern National had a solid crowd for a race delayed four hours by rain on Sunday.

NASCAR has already proven you can just build a track anywhere.

As for the TV side, the RTA already has a streaming channel.
 
I agree that it is probably a ploy to persuade Nascar to pay more money. I know little about golf, but isn't there only two major Golf series compared to many on the racing series side? Seems to me it would be much harder to compete or even effect the Nascar series.
 
So these not making enough money car owners are thinking about building different non Nascar cars for exhibition races. I wonder how many are in agreement with doing something like that?

Probably ain't **** for them to build a Late Model Stock Car, Super Late Model, or even a Gen-6 car. Many of these teams already have affiliations with Late Model operations.
 
I agree that it is probably a ploy to persuade Nascar to pay more money. I know little about golf, but isn't there only two major Golf series compared to many on the racing series side? Seems to me it would be much harder to compete or even effect the Nascar series.

It's definitely a ploy. But I do think the RTA is willing to demonstrate that they can do this without NASCAR.
 
I agree that it is probably a ploy to persuade Nascar to pay more money. I know little about golf, but isn't there only two major Golf series compared to many on the racing series side? Seems to me it would be much harder to compete or even effect the Nascar series.

If the starpower leaves NASCAR, it's easier to compete against it.

If you don't have the stars, you don't have a show.
 
Probably ain't **** for them to build a Late Model Stock Car, Super Late Model, or even a Gen-6 car. Many of these teams already have affiliations with Late Model operations.
Say they do. With interest equaling ARCA what team in their right mind with the overhead they have would be a threat to Nascar? I see drivers jumping ship to join new teams being formed in Nascar myself.
 
Say they do. With interest equaling ARCA what team in their right mind with the overhead they have would be a threat to Nascar? I see drivers jumping ship to join new teams being formed in Nascar myself.

17,000 people go to ARCA races on Wednesday nights?

ARCA races pack the grandstands at Florence and Southern National?

NASCAR isn't even the king of nationally televised auto racing in the United States anymore. F1 is.
 
17,000 people go to ARCA races on Wednesday nights?

ARCA races pack the grandstands at Florence and Southern National?

NASCAR isn't even the king of nationally televised auto racing in the United States anymore. F1 is.
wut. Don't think so. No use getting off track but look for yourself

Season Trends for Ratings​

RaceTV RatingAudience2021 Rating2021 AudienceDifference
Belgian GP0.571.045 M0.39637 K64%
Dutch GP0.621.148 M0.53870 K32%
Italian GP0.530.995 K0.53880 K31%
Singapore GP0.541.036 M0.37574 K (2019)80%
Japan GP0.28.549 K0.5756 K (2019)-27%
US GP0.641.113 M0.721.225 M-9%
Totals/Avg0.53.981 K0.50782429%
 
wut. Don't think so. No use getting off track but look for yourself

Season Trends for Ratings​

RaceTV RatingAudience2021 Rating2021 AudienceDifference
Belgian GP0.571.045 M0.39637 K64%
Dutch GP0.621.148 M0.53870 K32%
Italian GP0.530.995 K0.53880 K31%
Singapore GP0.541.036 M0.37574 K (2019)80%
Japan GP0.28.549 K0.5756 K (2019)-27%
US GP0.641.113 M0.721.225 M-9%
Totals/Avg0.53.981 K0.50782429%

You looking at totals or demos? Because "total viewers" don't mean shiit. Congratulations to NASCAR for having more geriatric viewers though.
 
"Fox Sports welcomes you to the Daytona 500. Natalie Decker, the face of NASCAR racing, is chasing her first win over names such as Parker Eatman, Sammy Smith and Carson Hocevar at the World Center of Speed where dozens of people wait with bated breath."
 
Nascar's best teams. I bet Trackhouse would be all in. Gordon has said they are losing money, no telling who else.

 
I don't think NASCAR will be very afraid of the RTA, but it does raise some interesting points when you ponder the hypotheticals.

The RTA will obviously know that the fanbase is clamoring for more short tracks. NASCAR has a stranglehold on intermediates and superspeedways, but the RTA does have a bargaining chip in that there are numerous short tracks that they could partner with like @AndyMarquisLive is saying.

As far as the cars, team owners have already said that the next gen isn't as cheap in actual usage as what was pitched to them originally. So they could tell NASCAR that they could build their own stockcar design, a more traditional late model style chassis, cheaper than the NASCAR Cup car anyway. Another win for them.

For prize money and exposure, to Andy's point too, if you lose the stars then it's game over. If all of the big teams and drivers were to leave, then basically the current Xfinity midfield would become the Cup series overnight. Fans would not stick around for that.

And then yeah, demographics. The NASCAR total viewership is still higher than F1, but their total viewship is also destined for a sharp decline over the next few years due to that aging demographic. NASCAR's fanbase is literally dying out and new fans from younger generations are not queued up to replace them.
 
Keep defending the notion that NASCAR can survive without drivers, doesn't need to pay the teams more, and can just replace star power (because they've done a great job replacing Dale, Jeff, and Jr). 👍

You have missed the point that I was making. The RTA if they decide to do this, it has to be good enough that it causes Nascar to have a gut check. I hope that is plain enough. It isn't going to be easy. Ideas will abound but something like SRX on steroids is one I think of. They had decent ratings on a major network.
 
You have missed the point that I was making. The RTA if they decide to do this, it has to be good enough that it causes Nascar to have a gut check. I hope that is plain enough. It isn't going to be easy. Ideas will abound but something like SRX on steroids is one I think of. They had decent ratings on a major network.
To go with this, I think if anything SRX was almost the prototype that allows an RTA split to have some confidence. Confidence that TV deals can be made without NASCAR. Other people know how to design stockcars and run a traveling circus. And attracting big names is really what it's all about, through the implementation of a good car and a good schedule. A new RTA series that's more "enthusiast" controlled and less porky than NASCAR might be able to go a really long way actually if they played their cards right.
 
I don't think NASCAR will be very afraid of the RTA, but it does raise some interesting points when you ponder the hypotheticals.

The RTA will obviously know that the fanbase is clamoring for more short tracks. NASCAR has a stranglehold on intermediates and superspeedways, but the RTA does have a bargaining chip in that there are numerous short tracks that they could partner with like @AndyMarquisLive is saying.

As far as the cars, team owners have already said that the next gen isn't as cheap in actual usage as what was pitched to them originally. So they could tell NASCAR that they could build their own stockcar design, a more traditional late model style chassis, cheaper than the NASCAR Cup car anyway. Another win for them.

For prize money and exposure, to Andy's point too, if you lose the stars then it's game over. If all of the big teams and drivers were to leave, then basically the current Xfinity midfield would become the Cup series overnight. Fans would not stick around for that.

And then yeah, demographics. The NASCAR total viewership is still higher than F1, but their total viewship is also destined for a sharp decline over the next few years due to that aging demographic. NASCAR's fanbase is literally dying out and new fans from younger generations are not queued up to replace them.

I was working for a racetrack one time, and the local news came out and did a story on two sisters who were racing with us. The tracktold me to stop writing features about drivers, and championship battles, and to stop having drivers featured on the news, and that I needed to promote "the facility" and "the track owner" more. The owner argued that people are there for the track, that the track is the show, that he's the show, and the drivers are a supporting act.

After weeks of fighting, I finally caved and did it his way. Our social media numbers went from being among the strongest in the immediate region (26,000-38,000 engagements per week on Facebook alone) to being the worst (less than 900 engagements per week) with that shift in strategy.

People who are in this for the money, and not for love of the sport, are genuinely this arrogant. They believe the show can go on without the stars.
 
You have missed the point that I was making. The RTA if they decide to do this, it has to be good enough that it causes Nascar to have a gut check. I hope that is plain enough. It isn't going to be easy. Ideas will abound but something like SRX on steroids is one I think of. They had decent ratings on a major network.

North Wilkesboro alone should have been a gut check for NASCAR. I mean, it was enough of one for them to take the Cup Series back there. But that event, the number of viewers who tuned in on Racing America and XR, the number of people in the stands, the absolute electricity in the atmosphere, that was all done without NASCAR. And all it took to make that the biggest race in the history of Late Model Stock Car racing was Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

See the point?
 
I was working for a racetrack one time, and the local news came out and did a story on two sisters who were racing with us. The tracktold me to stop writing features about drivers, and championship battles, and to stop having drivers featured on the news, and that I needed to promote "the facility" and "the track owner" more. The owner argued that people are there for the track, that the track is the show, that he's the show, and the drivers are a supporting act.

After weeks of fighting, I finally caved and did it his way. Our social media numbers went from being among the strongest in the immediate region (26,000-38,000 engagements per week on Facebook alone) to being the worst (less than 900 engagements per week) with that shift in strategy.

People who are in this for the money, and not for love of the sport, are genuinely this arrogant. They believe the show can go on without the stars.
That's insane. I believe it and I can see how it could get to that point with a track owner, but the cars can race at any decent track and the cars will bring the eyeballs to watch. A track without cars is literally useless. The cars, the drivers, the competition is everything. In my view, a track promoter's task is to best showcase the cars and make for an experience that makes people feel positive and want to return, by offering competitive ticket prices, or concessions, or whatever, to support and compliment the main attraction. But what do I know, I don't own a track so whatever.
 
I was working for a racetrack one time, and the local news came out and did a story on two sisters who were racing with us. The tracktold me to stop writing features about drivers, and championship battles, and to stop having drivers featured on the news, and that I needed to promote "the facility" and "the track owner" more. The owner argued that people are there for the track, that the track is the show, that he's the show, and the drivers are a supporting act.

After weeks of fighting, I finally caved and did it his way. Our social media numbers went from being among the strongest in the immediate region (26,000-38,000 engagements per week on Facebook alone) to being the worst (less than 900 engagements per week) with that shift in strategy.

People who are in this for the money, and not for love of the sport, are genuinely this arrogant. They believe the show can go on without the stars.
one important point you missed. Stars go where the money is as a general rule.
 
North Wilkesboro alone should have been a gut check for NASCAR. I mean, it was enough of one for them to take the Cup Series back there. But that event, the number of viewers who tuned in on Racing America and XR, the number of people in the stands, the absolute electricity in the atmosphere, that was all done without NASCAR. And all it took to make that the biggest race in the history of Late Model Stock Car racing was Dale Earnhardt, Jr.

See the point?
I'd love a timeline where Dale Jr becomes the boss of the breakaway series altogether. It won't happen, but can you imagine...
 
one important point you missed. Stars go where the money is as a general rule.
The entire premise of this though is that the teams don't feel they're getting enough money out of the deal from NASCAR. If they are operating in the red, then the money for the drivers will dry up. It largely already has, compared to how it was in the late 90s into around 2010. Driver salaries have already been slashed dramatically with many big name but younger drivers making six figures instead of the seven figure numbers that it was before.
 
Over 17,000 people packed their asses into North Wilkesboro, a track with no modern amenities whatsoever, on a Wednesday night for a CARS Tour race.

No WiFi, no cell service, no running water, no air conditioned suites or media center, no NBC, no jumbotrons, no fancy scoreboards, no FanVision, no app to let you listen to your favorite driver. And 17,000+ people left work, got in their cars, sat in an hours-long traffic jam on a single lane country bum**** backroad, and marched into the stands to witness Southern Jesus race.


one important point you missed. Stars go where the money is as a general rule.

Hahahahahahahahaha. That's why these dudes are showing up to $5,000-to-win Late Model races.

Stay in your lane. You're holding up traffic in the fast lane.
 
IMG_9150.jpg
 
That's insane. I believe it and I can see how it could get to that point with a track owner, but the cars can race at any decent track and the cars will bring the eyeballs to watch. A track without cars is literally useless. The cars, the drivers, the competition is everything. In my view, a track promoter's task is to best showcase the cars and make for an experience that makes people feel positive and want to return, by offering competitive ticket prices, or concessions, or whatever, to support and compliment the main attraction. But what do I know, I don't own a track so whatever.

My bosses, where I work now, are supportive of my PR strategy, a formula that has been effective in four different media markets, where I showcase the drivers and make them the show.
 
Over 17,000 people packed their asses into North Wilkesboro, a track with no modern amenities whatsoever, on a Wednesday night for a CARS Tour race.

No WiFi, no cell service, no running water, no air conditioned suites or media center, no NBC, no jumbotrons, no fancy scoreboards, no FanVision, no app to let you listen to your favorite driver. And 17,000+ people left work, got in their cars, sat in an hours-long traffic jam on a single lane country bum**** backroad, and marched into the stands to witness Southern Jesus race.




Hahahahahahahahaha. That's why these dudes are showing up to $5,000-to-win Late Model races.

Stay in your lane. You're holding up traffic in the fast lane.
Without TV 5 grand is all ya get paid? that's an insult to a cup driver lol. The dam plane to get there costs that much
 
You have to love an aggressive power play.

The tracks will be getting a haircut.
 
Without competing head to head date to date, I don't think Nascar's tracks are going to suffer. The exhibition races have to pull some weight to have leverage. IF they do go thru with it, it would be cool if they get a decent TV deal..more racing for me lol.
 
The world of streaming was the last needed piece of the puzzle for a NASCAR split to conceivably happen.

15 years ago you needed a TV deal, tracks that held 80,000+ people, and Fortune 500 companies as sponsors. Now you need a steaming deal, tracks that hold 20,000, and the sponsors are small local companies or B-to-B deals.
 
Without competing head to head date to date, I don't think Nascar's tracks are going to suffer. The exhibition races have to pull some weight to have leverage. IF they do go thru with it, it would be cool if they get a decent TV deal..more racing for me lol.
The RTA owns a media/broadcast company.
 
Back
Top Bottom