Should Amrose have been given the spot back

Should Amrose have been given the spot back


  • Total voters
    38
I think there's a debate due to the fact that peoples opinions differ.

So not everyone agrees all the time with MY opinion - big deal - get over it and allow others to see things as they wish.

Surely we have the ability to state where we stand on an issue without disparaging others, don't we?
 
I think there's a debate due to the fact that peoples opinions differ.

So not everyone agrees all the time with MY opinion - big deal - get over it and allow others to see things as they wish.

Surely we have the ability to state where we stand on an issue without disparaging others, don't we?

Amen! :cool:
 
I think there's a debate due to the fact that peoples opinions differ.

So not everyone agrees all the time with MY opinion - big deal - get over it and allow others to see things as they wish.

Surely we have the ability to state where we stand on an issue without disparaging others, don't we?

And I'm saying the opinions differ because of the characters involved.

Marcos Ambrose wins on Sunday off Jimmie Johnson mistake -- just about everyone except JJ's fans support NASCAR's decision. Mark Martin wins 2007 Daytona 500, just about everyone except Harvick's fans support NASCAR's decision.
 
Originally Posted by kkfan91
but Ambrose was still on the track he didn't pit

And? The rule clearly states that if you stop you don't keep your spot. I don't see how anyone can argue when it's right there in black and white.

Stewert Fan....consider the source. If you try to reason with kk...you will end up banging your head against the wall.
 
Back
Top Bottom