YesWouldnt this still be up to the state’s laws?
Wouldnt this still be up to the state’s laws?
I don't see how betting at the track would help. Horse racing has had it for decades and yet it has almost no national following. Other than the Triple Crown, is it available on TV other than a couple of specialized satellite networks? Is anyone building new horse racing tracks, or increasing capacity and adding events at existing ones? Frankly, horse racing doesn't have the cleanest reputation; would NASCAR want to devote resources to the continuous pre-emptive defense of its standards?Unless they were to open pari-mutual betting at the track, I don’t see how it impacts Nascar at all. And I just don’t see that Nascar would want to turn into that kind of business.
General anticipation is that it'll be opened up throughout the country. A good number of states have already drafted bills and several leagues have already been lobbying.Wouldnt this still be up to the state’s laws?
I'd wager to say a few million more will bet on the race then will the ponies and certainly more often. If NASCAR can tap in to this its a complete new revenue source.I don't see how betting at the track would help. Horse racing has had it for decades and yet it has almost no national following. Other than the Triple Crown, is it available on TV other than a couple of specialized satellite networks? Is anyone building new horse racing tracks, or increasing capacity and adding events at existing ones? Frankly, horse racing doesn't have the cleanest reputation; would NASCAR want to devote resources to the continuous pre-emptive defense of its standards?
What's different about NASCAR that wagering (at the track or on line) would benefit the sport in ways it hasn't benefitted the ponies?
I don't know what was in Jeff's coffee this morning. I live in the same city he does, so whatever he's drinking, I'm going to seek it out, sounds fun. He and a few other media figures are running wild with what NASCAR can do to make wagering central to the sport.
I pretty much abhor gambling. Not on moral grounds, but because I think it is a silly waste of money. If others like it and don't abuse it, that doesn't really bother me. Does anyone else connect with this vision of NASCAR betting windows and such?
I don't doubt that more will be bet on NASCAR than horses. My point was that legal, at-the-track wagering over the last several decades hasn't made horse racing into sport popular with the general public. Is there reason to think it will raise NASCAR's popularity with the majority of casual fans who don't bet?I'd wager to say a few million more will bet on the race then will the ponies and certainly more often.
I dunno about the advisability of that. Is there any other sporting sanctioning body that taps into gambling as a revenue source? Doing so strikes me as giving the appearance of fixing, if not leading to actually rigging the outcomes for fun and profit.... If NASCAR can tap in to this its a complete new revenue source.
If sports gambling is legalized in a state, It will be possible to wager on races in that state regardless of gambling's legality in NC, TN, or any other race-hosting state. Vegas sports books already take bets on all Cup races, along with other racing-related wagers.So, when will TN (lottery tickets first sold in 2004), and NC (lottery tickets first sold in 2006), will get around to legalized gambling in what year? I bring it up as I don't see this effecting any races in NC for the foreseeable future and TN might be a bit iffy.
yeah but if you are going to build a casino or a racetrack it matters. At track betting.If sports gambling is legalized in a state, It will be possible to wager on races in that state regardless of gambling's legality in NC, TN, or any other race-hosting state. Vegas sports books already take bets on all Cup races, along with other racing-related wagers.
Well, at least a casino. Who in their right mind would build a race track these days?yeah but if you are going to build a casino or a racetrack it matters. At track betting.
I just wrote about two of them a couple posts up. Built without any guarantees, one is supported by taxpayers and the other Will Rodgers Downs in Claremore went broke until the Indians bought it and put in a casino along with the quarter horse racing.Well, at least a casino. Who in their right mind would build a race track these days?
See the NFL and NBA, hell you had refs fixing games in the NBA.I don't doubt that more will be bet on NASCAR than horses. My point was that legal, at-the-track wagering over the last several decades hasn't made horse racing into sport popular with the general public. Is there reason to think it will raise NASCAR's popularity with the majority of casual fans who don't bet?
More often? Why won't it just be like the NCAA tournament, the only time casual fans pay attention to basketball? Their interest in that sport begins and ends with a $10 workplace pool completed with the assistance of a tossed quarter, and promptly forgotten when the tournament ends regardless of their success. They'll pick a driver they've heard of, bet on him in the D500 or Brickyard, and have to be reminded of his name when the first stage ends.
I dunno about the advisability of that. Is there any other sporting sanctioning body that taps into gambling as a revenue source? Doing so strikes me as giving the appearance of fixing, if not leading to actually rigging the outcomes for fun and profit.
My apologies for not making myself clear. I'll try again.I just wrote about two of them a couple posts up. Built without any guarantees, one is supported by taxpayers and the other Will Rodgers Downs in Claremore went broke until the Indians bought it and put in a casino along with the quarter horse racing.
I cannot think of a bigger sucker bet than Daytona or Talladega.Best case scenario..Nascar will see a bump in media coverage, viewership, attendance, social media and word of mouth for a select few events.
The biggDaytona and Talladega races
I cannot think of a bigger sucker bet than Daytona or Talladega.
If sports gambling is legalized in a state, It will be possible to wager on races in that state regardless of gambling's legality in NC, TN, or any other race-hosting state. Vegas sports books already take bets on all Cup races, along with other racing-related wagers.
So, when will TN (lottery tickets first sold in 2004), and NC (lottery tickets first sold in 2006), will get around to legalized gambling in what year? I bring it up as I don't see this effecting any races in NC for the foreseeable future and TN might be a bit iffy.
SC passed a law within the last few years so it's no longer illegal for people to hold their weekly poker games at home.That's interesting, as I did not previously know that gambling was still quite such a nonstarter in those states. It seems true of South Carolina and other surrounding states as well.
So they will choose to miss out on the taxation of betting on all sports, not just NASCAR. NCAA basketball and football are huge in NC and TN, so you think they will miss the train? We will see. NC is running record budget deficits and they won’t sit on the sidelines for long, unless they have idiots running their state who don’t want to at least appear like they’re trying to fix their deficit.You misunderstood what I stated. My point was that in TN or NC it won't matter. Neither is likely to legalize gambling anytime soon and to highlight that I pointed out that both were very late to the game when it came to legalizing the lottery. Some might think that betting on racing in NC or TN might be good for NASCAR. Maybe it will or maybe it won't be. However, noting the history we aren't going to find out anytime soon.
So they will choose to miss out on the taxation of betting on all sports, not just NASCAR. NCAA basketball and football are huge in NC and TN, so you think they will miss the train? We will see. NC is running record budget deficits and they won’t sit on the sidelines for long, unless they have idiots running their state who don’t want to at least appear like they’re trying to fix their deficit.