StandOnIt
Farm Truck
maybe they did in your world. that was all they had to work with, it was a make it fit in Xfinity and fit right in with the other more doors in cup
I posted the rule changes months ago, the wind tunnel wasn't one of themNot anymore for some reason.
You're much more of a car guy than I am. I won't cross the street to get a closer look at any of the three.Never, ever said that you would buy one, but maybe you might like to see it in person? I will never own a Supra (maybe) , but I will certainly check it out as I have the Camaro and Mustang. Consumer Reports sucks BTW....my two cents.
I'm not sure what's controversial about using a the wind tunnel to improve the aerodynamic lines of a race car.
Marketing, same reason the other manufacturers enter models that don't have anything in common with their consumer counterparts. IMSA would be a better fit if Toyota (or Ford or Chevy) were interested in demonstrating the capabilities of the production Supra (or Mustang or Camaro).much of the talk from car guys about the Supra IS why Nascar? Most think IMSA makes for a better fit. Why Nascar to me?..lets take yet another shot at designing a wind tunnel car, we will call it Supra.
You couldn't run that today; the fans would scream that it had a wind instead of a spoiler.
Continential tire/IMSA has a series with Ford Mustang and the Camaro that races them.Marketing, same reason the other manufacturers enter models that don't have anything in common with their consumer counterparts. IMSA would be a better fit if Toyota (or Ford or Chevy) were interested in demonstrating the capabilities of the production Supra (or Mustang or Camaro).
Gracias. I can barely keep up with Cup, X, Trucks, Indy, and WeatheTech. I'm barely familiar with the IMSA lower-tier series.Continential tire/IMSA has a series with Ford Mustang and the Camaro that races them.
Not unless there is a new rule package which caters to Toyota.so shortly after these changes comes the entirely new "Supra"? One can say coincidence, others can say here we go again.
No question. Motorsports are pretty bangless outside of NASCAR. This would be why Toyota left IndyCar to join NASCAR.Maybe Toyota doesn't feel there's any bang for their motorsports marketing buck in the US outside NASCAR.
I posted the rule changes months ago, the wind tunnel wasn't one of them
here ya go catch up. In the black, would be the carping area about the OSS that all teams had to deal with.
Chief among the handful of changes on the aerodynamic and technical front are the use of a common flat splitter and radiator/oil cooler for 2018.
The radiator/oil cooler move is something that is already in play at superspeedways. The common splitter, meanwhile, will be new for all venues.
“As we do that, some of the downforce will be removed from the car, so we will see a rearward shift in the balance of the car,” he said. “We estimate somewhere between two to two-and-a-half percentage points backward (approximately 100-120 pounds of downforce).
“So there will be an aerodynamic change. For that reason, we’ve decided to kind of leave things as they are because that will be something that teams will need to deal with. That’s basically the big thing on the non-superspeedway tracks as far as the aero package is concerned.”
In addition to the 100-120 pounds that will be gone with the common radiator and splitter changes, another 150 or so "is coming off due to the new officiating process and the tolerances we've agreed to,",” he said.
“When you look at it you say you don’t see a lot physically different with the car, but those two element themselves are a fairly significant change, which was another reason we decided just to kind of hold where we are.”
It's a rule change doesn't have anything to do with a wind tunnel.