Don't they put dealers of other types of addictive drugs in jail?
Don't they arrest and imprison people who manufacture other types of drugs?
And isn't tobacco just about the most addictive drug openly available?
Doesn't tobacco kill more of its users than any other drug currently in popular use?
Haven't the tobacco companies killed enough of their customers yet?
Yep, it was a free choice to start smoking, made at a time when a very large number of people in our society were tobacco users. Unfortunately, once you start smoking, it is not all that easy to quit.
I, along with millions of other people, had been smoking for quite a few years before anyone mentioned that using tobacco was hazardous to one's health.
You started smoking after the dangers of using tobacco were well known and publicized; there are thousands of smokers who became addicted long before the government forced big tobacco to make that knowledge public.
When you have a bit of time, go to the library and look through some of the old magazines, Life, Saturday Evening Post or almost any others from the 1940's, 50's or even the 1960's; notice the advertisements.
Then take the time to look up the costs of tobacco usage over the years, the number of lives cut short, and then tell me that I am wrong in my feelings toward big tobacco.
As far as you quitting majestyx, I'm certainly glad to hear that you have, but after only eight months, do not feel that you are free of the habit at all. As I said, I quit in 1996 after I had a major heart attack, I have all sorts of physical problems that are directly related to my use of tobacco from a very young age, and I still crave cigarettes at times.
If you knew that tobacco was unhealthy before you started using it, and still made the choice, that is your own fault. Unfortunately, there were smokers for years who listened to the lies tossed at us from those who profit greatly from the suffering and death of their customers, and only found out long after we were addicted that tobacco was an addiction and that it would (not could) kill us.
And those same killers are still allowed to continue pocketing the profits from their deadly product?
I'm sorry, but I really have a hard time justifying that in my own mind. Something is terribly wrong with this picture. I wonder if the fact that a bunch of politicians are being bought off by the tobacco companies might enter into this scenerio at all?
Hmm.....