HoneyBadger
Kelsey Mitchell fan account
I love how this basically became a Sophie Cunningham thread. 


Having a Sophie around gives the WNBA a leg up on most anything else.I love how this basically became a Sophie Cunningham thread.![]()
Yes, but it will probably revert to a CC thread if the new WNBA season actually starts in 2026. Caitlin is still the face of the WNBA.I love how this basically became a Sophie Cunningham thread.![]()
Yes, but it will probably revert to a CC thread if the new WNBA season actually starts in 2026. Caitlin is still the face of the WNBA.
Geez, the WNBA teams can only exclude 5 players in the upcoming draft. That means either Lexie or Sophie will not be with the Fever, not fair. The WNBA is trying to dilute the play of the league with all the new teams.Especially is Sophie is no longer with the fever which is likely.
Geez, the WNBA teams can only exclude 5 players in the upcoming draft. That means either Lexie or Sophie will not be with the Fever, not fair. The WNBA is trying to dilute the play of the league with all the new teams.
Geez, the WNBA teams can only exclude 5 players in the upcoming draft. That means either Lexie or Sophie will not be with the Fever, not fair. The WNBA is trying to dilute the play of the league with all the new teams.
Yeah, apparently they can only protect 5 players this time because there are two expansion teams in the draft, and because the overwhelming majority of the players in the league will be unrestricted free agents. It is what it is.And we’re gonna keep having expansion drafts until 2030.
Sophie is gone. And Portland or Toronto will take her for the social media presence.
IMO players on rookie deals should be protected.Yeah, apparently they can only protect 5 players this time because there are two expansion teams in the draft, and because the overwhelming majority of the players in the league will be unrestricted free agents. It is what it is.
I assumed that Sophie was already likely gone from Indy regardless, provided that someone offered her a big enough bag in free agency, but you never know. Nothing is set in stone.
I agree that players on rookie deals should be ineligible for selection in the expansion draft, just like players who have spent two seasons with the "core" designation and are now unrestricted free agents, like Stewie, JJ, and Natasha Howard, are ineligible.IMO players on rookie deals should be protected.
Doing this every year is exhausting.
The point is, it doesn't have to be that way!I agree that players on rookie deals should be ineligible for selection in the expansion draft, just like players who have spent two seasons with the "core" designation and are now unrestricted free agents, like Stewie, JJ, and Natasha Howard, are ineligible.
As for the exhaustion, I get it. It's the price of expansion. There are 24 new roster spots to fill, and the players obviously have to come from somewhere. As unfair as it may seem to the established teams to deal with, it would be just as or more unfair for the new teams if they were restricted to picking up only undrafted players and free agents. It is what it is.
Muggle, this comes off to me as a weird and unnecessarily hostile response. I don't get it. I was merely attempting to discuss the expansion draft with Andy, not start yet another pointless fight up here with you.The point is, it doesn't have to be that way!
I agree that players on rookie deals should be ineligible for selection in the expansion draft, just like players who have spent two seasons with the "core" designation and are now unrestricted free agents, like Stewie, JJ, and Natasha Howard, are ineligible.
As for the exhaustion, I get it. It's the price of expansion. There are 24 new roster spots to fill, and the players obviously have to come from somewhere. As unfair as it may seem to the established teams to deal with, it would be just as or more unfair for the new teams if they were restricted to picking up only undrafted players and free agents. It is what it is.
Bringing in two expansion teams in the same year when one just came in the year prior is certainly a lot for a league that only had 12 teams before this.They’re expanding too much way too rapidly.
IMO, the expansion teams should get the first and second overall pick in the draft. And two more first round picks. And the expansion drafts be more limited, rookie deal players and core designated players exempt and teams protect five.
You misunderstand my post. Read it again. I was simply saying that the rules for the expansion draft do not have to be the way it is, which is horrible. Don't try to make something out of it that isn't intended or there.Muggle, this comes off to me as a weird and unnecessarily hostile response. I don't get it. I was merely attempting to discuss the expansion draft with Andy, not start yet another pointless fight up here with you.
I never said or implied that the expansion draft had to be a certain way. I didn't make the expansion draft rules and have no power to change them. Please do not take whatever frustration you may feel about them out on me.
The WNBA is going to tear teams apart and ruin the viewing for fans of their favorite teams with the expansion rules.And we’re gonna keep having expansion drafts until 2030.
Sophie is gone. And Portland or Toronto will take her for the social media presence.
Muggle, I'm not trying to make something out of anything with you. I wasn't even talking to you - you quoted me. I've read your response and didn't get where you were coming from, because it had little to do with what I said and therefore came off weird to me.You misunderstand my post. Read it again. I was simply saying that the rules for the expansion draft do not have to be the way it is, which is horrible. Don't try to make something out of it that isn't intended or there.
The WNBA is going to tear teams apart and ruin the viewing for fans of their favorite teams with the expansion rules.
Indeed. For once we agree. Enough of this BS.Enough of this BS.