As much as I wish it were back to that, those days are long gone. After 10+ years it may just be time to move on..... or not.I appreciate a victor who has accumulated the most points all season. No matter who wins the championship.
As much as I wish it were back to that, those days are long gone. After 10+ years it may just be time to move on..... or not.I appreciate a victor who has accumulated the most points all season. No matter who wins the championship.
Yeah, I doubt we'll ever go back to straight points, but I do hope a better format comes along soon. Given the low ratings we've seen thus far in the Chase, it may not be long until the next revamp.As much as I wish it were back to that, those days are long gone. After 10+ years it may just be time to move on..... or not.
For anyone who cares, what the points would look like under last year's format:
1. Joey Logano - 2,184
2. Kevin Harvick - 2,156 (-28)
3. Kyle Busch - 2,150 (-34)
4. Brad Keselowski - 2,149 (-35)
5. Jeff Gordon - 2,148 (-36)
6. Carl Edwards - 2,130 (-54)
7. Ryan Newman - 2,130 (-54)
8. Matt Kenseth - 2,128 (-56)
9. Jimmie Johnson - 2,125 (-59)
10. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. - 2,110 (-74)
11. Greg Biffle - 2,101 (-83)
12. Kasey Kahne - 2,099 (-85)
13. Kyle Larson - 901
14. Clint Bowyer - 853
15. Jamie McMurray - 825
16. Paul Menard - 816
17. Austin Dillon - 815
18. Brian Vickers - 799
19. Denny Hamlin - 774
20. Marcos Ambrose - 726
Pretty much.hhmmm.......except for hamlin replacing biffle .......ain't that tha same top 12 as '14 chase format as of now ??
This is still making me like the real, real championship points more.For anyone who cares, what the points would look like under last year's format:
1. Joey Logano - 2,184
2. Kevin Harvick - 2,156 (-28)
3. Kyle Busch - 2,150 (-34)
4. Brad Keselowski - 2,149 (-35)
5. Jeff Gordon - 2,148 (-36)
6. Carl Edwards - 2,130 (-54)
7. Ryan Newman - 2,130 (-54)
8. Matt Kenseth - 2,128 (-56)
9. Jimmie Johnson - 2,125 (-59)
10. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. - 2,110 (-74)
11. Greg Biffle - 2,101 (-83)
12. Kasey Kahne - 2,099 (-85)
13. Kyle Larson - 901
14. Clint Bowyer - 853
15. Jamie McMurray - 825
16. Paul Menard - 816
17. Austin Dillon - 815
18. Brian Vickers - 799
19. Denny Hamlin - 774
20. Marcos Ambrose - 726
Go FlyersIs this the place we talk about hockey? Starts tonight!
Just with all the stick-n-ball talk around here...............
GO LEAFS GO!!!
Unofficial Top 25 in 2014 Sprint Cup Driver Points Standings (not the Chase):
[after Charlotte, race 31 of 36]
(using current points system, but not the Chase rules, unofficial)
1) #24-Jeff Gordon(C6), 1096
2) #22-Joey Logano(C1), 1044, -52
3) #88-Dale Earnhardt Jr.(C12), 1009, -87
4) #2-Brad Keselowski(C10), 996, -100
5) #4-Kevin Harvick(C3), 986, -110
6) #20-Matt Kenseth(C9), 950, -146
7) #31-Ryan Newman(C4), 950, -146
8) #48-Jimmie Johnson(C11), 945, -151
9) #42-Kyle Larson, 940, -156
10) #99-Carl Edwards(C5), 938, -158
11) #16-Greg Biffle (EC), 880, -216
12) #18-Kyle Busch(C2), 877, -219
13) #5-Kasey Kahne(C8), 868, -228
14) #1-Jamie McMurray, 867, -229
15) #3-Austin Dillon,2 847, -249
16) #15-Clint Bowyer, 844, -252
17) #27-Paul Menard,2 818, -278
18) #11-Denny Hamlin(C7), 810, -286
19) #55-Brian Vickers, 806, -290
20) #41-Kurt Busch (EC), 757, -339
21) #47-AJ Allmendinger (EC), 750, -346
22) #78-Martin Truex Jr., 749, -347
23) #9-Marcos Ambrose, 745, -351
24) #43-Aric Almirola (EC), 721, -375
25) #13-Casey Mears, 682, -414
Updated:For anyone who cares, what the points would look like under last year's format:
1. Joey Logano - 2,184
2. Kevin Harvick - 2,156 (-28)
3. Kyle Busch - 2,150 (-34)
4. Brad Keselowski - 2,149 (-35)
5. Jeff Gordon - 2,148 (-36)
6. Carl Edwards - 2,130 (-54)
7. Ryan Newman - 2,130 (-54)
8. Matt Kenseth - 2,128 (-56)
9. Jimmie Johnson - 2,125 (-59)
10. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. - 2,110 (-74)
11. Greg Biffle - 2,101 (-83)
12. Kasey Kahne - 2,099 (-85)
13. Kyle Larson - 901
14. Clint Bowyer - 853
15. Jamie McMurray - 825
16. Paul Menard - 816
17. Austin Dillon - 815
18. Brian Vickers - 799
19. Denny Hamlin - 774
20. Marcos Ambrose - 726
Brian is sending us mixed messages. He dumbed down the points system a few years ago because he thought we couldn't add, then this year proceeded to unveil an extremely convoluted chase format that left everybody confused about how it exactly works.43-to-1 is terrible, and it's evident the current Chase format doesn't reward winning as much as they said it would. Can we please come up with a points system that actual makes winning mean something?
Brian is sending us mixed messages. He dumbed down the points system a few years ago because he thought we couldn't add, then this year proceeded to unveil an extremely convoluted chase format that left everybody confused about how it exactly works.
It rewards winning exactly as they said it would.43-to-1 is terrible, and it's evident the current Chase format doesn't reward winning as much as they said it would. Can we please come up with a points system that actual makes winning mean something?
Not to worry hawg, in a couple years I'll do a thread with what the points would have been under this format, after Brian changes it again.yeah.....when checkers fly at dega sunday......w/ all this chase confusion .......bet it'll be monday afore we find out tha top 8 that continue ta next round !![]()
on tha other hand ........prolly be tuesday / wednesday for ya'll 's updated points lists on this thread !![]()
Not to worry hawg, in a couple years I'll do a thread with what the points would have been under this format, after Brian changes it again.![]()
Of course I hope a Toyota wins it, but I'd still be just as much in favor of changing it as I am now regardless of the outcome.if a toyo wins it this yr .......thinkin it'll be "don't touch tha chase " from your camp !!
I still maintain that the 43-1 Chase system we had from 2011-2013 was darn near perfect. It simplified things, and at the same time, it struck a nice balance between winning and consistency. NASCAR fixed something that IMO wasn't broken when they came up with this new format. Everyone wanted closer points battles, right? Hell, the previous format gave us a tie in points in 2011 - and they only had to reset the points once! Everyone wanted winning to mean more, right? Stewart's five Chase wins won him that 2011 title.43-to-1 is terrible, and it's evident the current Chase format doesn't reward winning as much as they said it would. Can we please come up with a points system that actual makes winning mean something?
Which is why our boy would have won the championship under this format with no wins last year, right?It rewards winning exactly as they said it would.
So far, it rewards points racing. 10th, 11th, and 12th have combined for eleven wins (one Chase win) while 2nd, 4th, 5th, 7th, and 8th have combined for five wins (zero Chase). Winning won't be much of a factor until the final round when only one person gets in on points.It rewards winning exactly as they said it would.
Except in the Chase the vast majority of advancements are going to come from points and points alone. The intent wasn't so much to reward winning as it was to guarantee a "Game 7" every year and NASCAR said as much in their Meet the Press back in January.I know I'm treading ground in one of the many 'I hate the Chase' threads so I don't expect anything that I say on here to mean anything to you guys but to have said that it doesn't reward wins is anything but reality. Wins are what advanced teams into the post season as well as consistency on the part of others. Wins propelled drivers to the next round of eliminations as well as consistency on the part of others. They'll continue to do that through the next eliminations as well. It's doing exactly what it was designed to do.
The teams that are ready to be shown the door on Sunday afternoon would have been eliminated in any of the Chase formats that they've had to date. They haven't got the job done when it mattered. This includes my driver.
I think it was far from. It gave 3rd-14th a larger percentage of the winner's points than before, made the percentage of points to be picked up from passes between 2nd and 6th worth less (particularly stupid since passes that high up should have the largest increments), and made DNF outliers much more punishing and significant than they should ever be. Basically, it made Top 10ing and Top 15ing people to death that much more strategic than being aggressive towards the very front of the field. That's how someone like Austin Dillon can be higher in the championship than guys with much better statistics like Clint Bowyer and Paul Menard.I still maintain that the 43-1 Chase system we had from 2011-2013 was darn near perfect. It simplified things, and at the same time, it struck a nice balance between winning and consistency. NASCAR fixed something that IMO wasn't broken when they came up with this new format. Everyone wanted closer points battles, right? Hell, the previous format gave us a tie in points in 2011 - and they only had to reset the points once! Everyone wanted winning to mean more, right? Stewart's five Chase wins won him that 2011 title.
who is leading based on 1953 points?
Buck Baker.who is leading based on 1953 points?
Buck Baker.

No matter which chase format... Joey would be leading![]()
The Nature Boy Point System
1. 88 - Dale Earnhardt Jr.
2-43. Everyone else -1,000,000
Which means?.............. Nothin!Yep, Logano has been the best driver over the last 5 races since the Chase began.
Gordon has been the best overall driver this entire season.![]()
I designed a system on a website that let you play with the points that i can no longer find. I rigged it so Kasey always won.The Nature Boy Point System
1. 88 - Dale Earnhardt Jr.
2-43. Everyone else -1,000,000